Skip to content
Shreyas edited this page Dec 16, 2013 · 1 revision

#Evaluation Criteria

  1. Misuse of personal data
  2. Privacy policy
  3. Developer email
  4. Low ratings

##Look for:

  • "spam"
  • questions to developers about permissions and security, like "why do you need my..."
  • "spam"
  • "virus"
  • mentions of "privacy policy"
  • "personal info/information"
  • "spying"
  • "access (your|my)..."
  • language around "warning" other users
  • Mentions of "facebook", "contacts" and other permissions-related items.
  • "fake"
  • "lies | liar(s)"

##Fair apps:

  • mentions:
    • love
    • great
    • Excellent
    • useful
    • perfect
    • Amazing
  • General good sentiment

##Bad but fair apps: Many apps are bad but don't actually act maliciously

  • bugs & "bug fix"
  • "can't"
  • "no longer work"
  • "error"
  • Dissapointed
  • upgrade
  • ""iphone port""
  • "slow"
  • "UI" | "Layout" | "GUI"
  • "crash"
  • "does not work"
  • "broken"| "flaw(s)"
  • "tweaks"
  • negative "quality"
  • "useless"
  • expensive
  • "bring back"
  • Mention of type of phone - usually relates to bug fix or incompatibility
  • "please help"
  • "It would be better if"
    • if it were malware, they wouldn't try to help the developer improve it by giving helpful feedback

###Other recommendations for classification just classify using review titles since they are brief and to the point.

Clone this wiki locally