-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix to use string literal type in ArrayBuffer's Symbol.toStringTag
#60150
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix to use string literal type in ArrayBuffer's Symbol.toStringTag
#60150
Conversation
@typescript-bot test it |
@jakebailey Here are the results of running the user tests with tsc comparing Something interesting changed - please have a look. Details
|
Hey @jakebailey, the results of running the DT tests are ready. There were interesting changes: Changes are too big to display here, please check the log. |
@jakebailey Here they are:
tscComparison Report - baseline..pr
System info unknown
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
@jakebailey Here are the results of running the top 400 repos with tsc comparing Something interesting changed - please have a look. Details
|
@jakebailey Here are some more interesting changes from running the top 400 repos suite Details
|
@jakebailey Here are some more interesting changes from running the top 400 repos suite Details
|
I haven't figured it out yet, but maybe we need to update the |
Apparently the package maintainers need to update @types/node. FYI: #58573 (comment) |
/** | ||
* Read from a file. | ||
* | ||
* NOTE: do not rename this method as it is intended to align with the same named export of the "fs" module. | ||
*/ | ||
public readFileSync(path: string, encoding?: null): Buffer; // eslint-disable-line no-restricted-syntax |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I deleted this type because CI failed, but it might be better to revert it.
@rbuckton IMO, this PR should be included in TypeScript 5.7, but is it possible? |
No, this will need to wait for 5.8 |
Fixes #60149