feat: refactor app struct #57
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@beer-1 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughRecent changes enhance the application's functionality and maintainability by restructuring the codebase for improved modularity and performance. Key updates include the introduction of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant Mempool
participant Keeper
User->>App: Initiate transaction
App->>Mempool: Add transaction to mempool
Mempool->>Keeper: Process transaction
Keeper-->>App: Return transaction status
App-->>User: Confirm transaction result
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #57 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.07% 74.30% -0.78%
==========================================
Files 10 15 +5
Lines 1344 1467 +123
==========================================
+ Hits 1009 1090 +81
- Misses 291 328 +37
- Partials 44 49 +5
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
app/encoding.go (1)
Test coverage for
AutoCliOptsis missing.The function
AutoCliOptsdoes not have direct test coverage. Consider adding test cases to ensure its functionality is properly validated.
- No direct references to
AutoCliOptswere found in the test files.- Several test functions were found in
app/app_test.go, indicating it is relevant for application testing.Analysis chain
Line range hint
31-38:
Consistent database instantiation approved.The function
AutoCliOptsnow usesdbm.NewMemDB()for database instantiation, ensuring consistency across the codebase.Note: The added line is not covered by tests. Consider adding test coverage for this function.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for the `AutoCliOpts` function. # Test: Search for test functions. Expect: Test coverage for `AutoCliOpts`. rg --type go -A 5 $'func TestAutoCliOpts'Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify indirect test coverage for the `AutoCliOpts` function. # Search for references to `AutoCliOpts` in test files. rg --type go 'AutoCliOpts' --glob '*_test.go' # Search for any test functions that might be related to `AutoCliOpts`. rg --type go -A 5 'func Test'Length of output: 2102
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 31-31: app/encoding.go#L31
Added line #L31 was not covered by tests
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (11)
- .github/workflows/build-linux-arm64.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
- app/app.go (19 hunks)
- app/blocksdk.go (1 hunks)
- app/encoding.go (3 hunks)
- app/indexer.go (1 hunks)
- app/keepers/community_pool.go (1 hunks)
- app/keepers/keepers.go (1 hunks)
- app/keepers/keys.go (1 hunks)
- app/modules.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (10 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/build-linux-arm64.yml
- .github/workflows/lint.yml
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
app/encoding.go
[warning] 31-31: app/encoding.go#L31
Added line #L31 was not covered by testsapp/indexer.go
[warning] 28-29: app/indexer.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests
[warning] 41-42: app/indexer.go#L41-L42
Added lines #L41 - L42 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-46: app/indexer.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
[warning] 49-50: app/indexer.go#L49-L50
Added lines #L49 - L50 were not covered by tests
[warning] 53-54: app/indexer.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests
[warning] 57-58: app/indexer.go#L57-L58
Added lines #L57 - L58 were not covered by tests
[warning] 67-69: app/indexer.go#L67-L69
Added lines #L67 - L69 were not covered by tests
[warning] 71-73: app/indexer.go#L71-L73
Added lines #L71 - L73 were not covered by tests
[warning] 75-77: app/indexer.go#L75-L77
Added lines #L75 - L77 were not covered by tests
[warning] 79-81: app/indexer.go#L79-L81
Added lines #L79 - L81 were not covered by tests
[warning] 83-89: app/indexer.go#L83-L89
Added lines #L83 - L89 were not covered by testsapp/keepers/keys.go
[warning] 84-85: app/keepers/keys.go#L84-L85
Added lines #L84 - L85 were not covered by testsapp/blocksdk.go
[warning] 82-83: app/blocksdk.go#L82-L83
Added lines #L82 - L83 were not covered by tests
[warning] 103-104: app/blocksdk.go#L103-L104
Added lines #L103 - L104 were not covered by testsapp/app.go
[warning] 167-167: app/app.go#L167
Added line #L167 was not covered by tests
[warning] 239-240: app/app.go#L239-L240
Added lines #L239 - L240 were not covered by tests
[warning] 244-244: app/app.go#L244
Added line #L244 was not covered by tests
[warning] 246-250: app/app.go#L246-L250
Added lines #L246 - L250 were not covered by tests
[warning] 259-259: app/app.go#L259
Added line #L259 was not covered by tests
[warning] 286-286: app/app.go#L286
Added line #L286 was not covered by tests
[warning] 364-367: app/app.go#L364-L367
Added lines #L364 - L367 were not covered by tests
[warning] 423-424: app/app.go#L423-L424
Added lines #L423 - L424 were not covered by tests
[warning] 469-471: app/app.go#L469-L471
Added lines #L469 - L471 were not covered by tests
[warning] 585-586: app/app.go#L585-L586
Added lines #L585 - L586 were not covered by testsapp/keepers/keepers.go
[warning] 156-158: app/keepers/keepers.go#L156-L158
Added lines #L156 - L158 were not covered by tests
[warning] 163-165: app/keepers/keepers.go#L163-L165
Added lines #L163 - L165 were not covered by tests
[warning] 544-545: app/keepers/keepers.go#L544-L545
Added lines #L544 - L545 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (45)
app/keepers/community_pool.go (1)
18-21: Visibility change approved.The function
NewCommunityPoolKeeperhas been renamed tonewCommunityPoolKeeper, changing its visibility from public to private. This aligns with the design change to restrict external instantiation.Ensure that all external references to
NewCommunityPoolKeeperare updated accordingly.Verification successful
Visibility change approved.
The function
NewCommunityPoolKeeperhas been successfully renamed tonewCommunityPoolKeeper, and all references have been updated accordingly.
app/keepers/community_pool.goapp/keepers/keepers.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `NewCommunityPoolKeeper` are updated to `newCommunityPoolKeeper`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of `newCommunityPoolKeeper`. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewCommunityPoolKeeper'Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `NewCommunityPoolKeeper` are updated to `newCommunityPoolKeeper`. # Search for the old function name rg --type go -A 5 $'NewCommunityPoolKeeper' # Search for the new function name rg --type go -A 5 $'newCommunityPoolKeeper'Length of output: 1114
app/encoding.go (2)
Line range hint
19-24:
Consistent database instantiation approved.The function
MakeEncodingConfignow usesdbm.NewMemDB()for database instantiation, ensuring consistency across the codebase.
Line range hint
48-50:
Consistent database instantiation approved.The function
BasicManagernow usesdbm.NewMemDB()for database instantiation, ensuring consistency across the codebase.app/indexer.go (1)
20-89: Implementation approved.The
setupIndexerfunction initializes and configures various submodules and the indexer. The implementation appears correct.Note: Several added lines are not covered by tests. Consider adding test coverage for this function.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 28-29: app/indexer.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests
[warning] 41-42: app/indexer.go#L41-L42
Added lines #L41 - L42 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-46: app/indexer.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
[warning] 49-50: app/indexer.go#L49-L50
Added lines #L49 - L50 were not covered by tests
[warning] 53-54: app/indexer.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests
[warning] 57-58: app/indexer.go#L57-L58
Added lines #L57 - L58 were not covered by tests
[warning] 67-69: app/indexer.go#L67-L69
Added lines #L67 - L69 were not covered by tests
[warning] 71-73: app/indexer.go#L71-L73
Added lines #L71 - L73 were not covered by tests
[warning] 75-77: app/indexer.go#L75-L77
Added lines #L75 - L77 were not covered by tests
[warning] 79-81: app/indexer.go#L79-L81
Added lines #L79 - L81 were not covered by tests
[warning] 83-89: app/indexer.go#L83-L89
Added lines #L83 - L89 were not covered by testsapp/keepers/keys.go (6)
62-64: LGTM!The
GetKVStoreKeymethod correctly returns the KVStore keys.
66-68: LGTM!The
GetTransientStoreKeymethod correctly returns the transient store keys.
70-72: LGTM!The
GetMemoryStoreKeymethod correctly returns the memory store keys.
42-59: LGTM! Verify the usage of the keys.The
GenerateKeysmethod initializes various keys correctly. Ensure that all these keys are necessary and used appropriately throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Keys are used appropriately.
The
GenerateKeysmethod initializes various keys, and these keys are used correctly throughout the codebase in different contexts, such as initializing keepers and in test files.
authtypes.StoreKeyis used inapp/keepers/keepers.goandapp/app_test.go.banktypes.StoreKeyis used inapp/keepers/keepers.goandapp/app_test.go.- Other keys follow a similar pattern of usage in
app/keepers/keepers.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the initialized keys in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of each key. Expect: Each key should be used appropriately. rg --type go -A 5 $'authtypes.StoreKey|banktypes.StoreKey|group.StoreKey|consensusparamtypes.StoreKey|crisistypes.StoreKey|ibcexported.StoreKey|upgradetypes.StoreKey|ibctransfertypes.StoreKey|ibcnfttransfertypes.StoreKey|capabilitytypes.StoreKey|authzkeeper.StoreKey|feegrant.StoreKey|icahosttypes.StoreKey|icacontrollertypes.StoreKey|icaauthtypes.StoreKey|ibcfeetypes.StoreKey|movetypes.StoreKey|opchildtypes.StoreKey|auctiontypes.StoreKey|packetforwardtypes.StoreKey|ratelimittypes.StoreKey|oracletypes.StoreKey|ibchookstypes.StoreKey|forwardingtypes.StoreKey|marketmaptypes.StoreKey'Length of output: 10376
74-79: LGTM! Verify the usage in testing contexts.The
GetKeymethod correctly returns the KVStore key for a given store key. Ensure that this method is only used in testing contexts as intended.Verification successful
Verification successful!
The
GetKeymethod is correctly used only in testing contexts, as evidenced by its usage inapp/app_test.go.
app/app_test.go: Verified usage in test context.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `GetKey` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `GetKey` method. Expect: Used only in testing contexts. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetKey'Length of output: 972
81-93: LGTM! Verify the usage in testing contexts.The
GetTKeyandGetMemKeymethods correctly return the transient store key and memory store key for a given store key, respectively. Ensure that these methods are only used in testing contexts as intended.Verification successful
Verify the usage of
GetTKeyin testing contexts.The
GetMemKeymethod is used in a testing context as intended. However, we need to verify the usage of theGetTKeymethod to ensure it is also used exclusively in testing contexts.
Verify the usage of
GetTKeyacross the entire codebase.The
GetTKeymethod is defined but not shown to be used in the provided output. We need to confirm its usage or lack thereof across the entire codebase.
The
GetTKeymethod is not used and theGetMemKeymethod is used correctly in a testing context.
- The
GetTKeymethod is defined but not utilized anywhere in the codebase.- The
GetMemKeymethod is used in a testing context as intended.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `GetTKey` and `GetMemKey` methods in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `GetTKey` and `GetMemKey` methods. Expect: Used only in testing contexts. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetTKey|GetMemKey'Length of output: 897
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `GetTKey` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `GetTKey` method. Expect: Used only in testing contexts. rg --type go -A 5 'GetTKey'Length of output: 527
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `GetTKey` method across the entire codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `GetTKey` method. Expect: To find any usage instances. rg 'GetTKey'Length of output: 208
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 84-85: app/keepers/keys.go#L84-L85
Added lines #L84 - L85 were not covered by testsapp/blocksdk.go (6)
25-35: LGTM!The
setupBlockSDKfunction initializes various components of the BlockSDK correctly.
37-77: LGTM!The mempool and lane setup is correctly configured with appropriate parameters.
79-83: LGTM!The mempool initialization and error handling are correctly implemented.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 82-83: app/blocksdk.go#L82-L83
Added lines #L82 - L83 were not covered by tests
85-104: LGTM!The ante handler setup is correctly implemented with appropriate parameters.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 103-104: app/blocksdk.go#L103-L104
Added lines #L103 - L104 were not covered by tests
106-121: LGTM!The lane options setup is correctly implemented with appropriate options.
123-146: LGTM!The proposal handlers setup is correctly implemented with appropriate parameters.
app/modules.go (6)
68-85: LGTM!The module account permissions are correctly defined with appropriate permissions assigned.
87-119: LGTM!The app modules setup is correctly implemented with appropriate parameters and configurations.
122-134: LGTM!The basic manager setup is correctly implemented with appropriate parameters and configurations.
136-157: LGTM!The order of BeginBlockers is correctly defined with appropriate dependencies and requirements.
159-177: LGTM!The order of EndBlockers is correctly defined with appropriate dependencies and requirements.
180-196: LGTM!The order of InitBlockers is correctly defined with appropriate dependencies and requirements.
go.mod (11)
3-3: LGTM!The Go version update from
1.22to1.22.0is a minor revision.
17-17: LGTM!The dependency
cosmossdk.io/x/upgradehas been updated fromv0.1.1tov0.1.3.
18-18: LGTM!The dependency
github.com/cometbft/cometbfthas been updated fromv0.38.7tov0.38.10.
20-20: LGTM!The dependency
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdkhas been updated fromv0.50.7tov0.50.8.
22-22: LGTM!The dependency
github.com/cosmos/gogoprotohas been updated fromv1.4.12tov1.5.0.
44-44: LGTM!The dependency
github.com/spf13/cobrahas been updated fromv1.8.0tov1.8.1.
45-45: LGTM!The dependency
github.com/spf13/viperhas been updated fromv1.18.2tov1.19.0.
52-52: LGTM!The dependency
cloud.google.com/gohas been updated fromv0.112.0tov0.112.1.
242-242: LGTM!The dependency
google.golang.org/apihas been updated fromv0.162.0tov0.171.0.
280-280: LGTM!The dependency
github.com/cometbft/cometbfthas been replaced withgithub.com/initia-labs/cometbftwith a specific commit hash.
281-281: LGTM!The dependency
github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/v8has been replaced withgithub.com/initia-labs/ibc-go/v8with a specific commit hash.app/app.go (9)
66-66: LGTM!The import statement for
keepershas been added for the newAppKeepersstructure.
100-100: LGTM!The removal of
maccPermsindicates a refactor in how module account permissions are managed.
Line range hint
100-123:
LGTM!The
MinitiaAppstruct has been modified to includekeepers.AppKeepers, consolidating various keeper instances into a single component.
Line range hint
138-300:
LGTM!The
NewMinitiaAppfunction has been modified to initialize usingAppKeepers, improving readability and modularity.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 239-240: app/app.go#L239-L240
Added lines #L239 - L240 were not covered by tests
[warning] 244-244: app/app.go#L244
Added line #L244 was not covered by tests
[warning] 246-250: app/app.go#L246-L250
Added lines #L246 - L250 were not covered by tests
[warning] 259-259: app/app.go#L259
Added line #L259 was not covered by tests
364-368: LGTM!The new function
SetKVIndexerencapsulates the logic for setting the kvindexer keeper and module, improving modularity.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 364-367: app/app.go#L364-L367
Added lines #L364 - L367 were not covered by tests
409-414: LGTM!The function
ModuleAccountAddrshas been updated to align with the newAppKeepersstructure.
416-424: LGTM!The function
BlockedModuleAccountAddrshas been updated to align with the newAppKeepersstructure.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 423-424: app/app.go#L423-L424
Added lines #L423 - L424 were not covered by tests
469-471: LGTM!The function
RegisterGRPCGatewayRouteshas been updated to include the kvindexer module, ensuring proper registration with the gRPC gateway.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 469-471: app/app.go#L469-L471
Added lines #L469 - L471 were not covered by tests
585-586: LGTM!The function
Closehas been updated to close the kvindexer keeper, ensuring proper resource management.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 585-586: app/app.go#L585-L586
Added lines #L585 - L586 were not covered by testsapp/keepers/keepers.go (3)
1-91: LGTM!The package declaration and imports include necessary dependencies for the keepers.
93-133: LGTM!The
AppKeepersstruct consolidates the management of application state and interactions between different modules.
135-582: LGTM!The
NewAppKeeperfunction encapsulates the initialization logic for the keepers, improving modularity.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 156-158: app/keepers/keepers.go#L156-L158
Added lines #L156 - L158 were not covered by tests
[warning] 163-165: app/keepers/keepers.go#L163-L165
Added lines #L163 - L165 were not covered by tests
[warning] 544-545: app/keepers/keepers.go#L544-L545
Added lines #L544 - L545 were not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- app/app.go (19 hunks)
- app/app_test.go (1 hunks)
- app/blocksdk.go (1 hunks)
- app/indexer.go (1 hunks)
- app/keepers/keys.go (1 hunks)
- app/modules.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/keepers/keys.go
- app/modules.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
app/indexer.go
[warning] 28-29: app/indexer.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests
[warning] 41-42: app/indexer.go#L41-L42
Added lines #L41 - L42 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-46: app/indexer.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
[warning] 49-50: app/indexer.go#L49-L50
Added lines #L49 - L50 were not covered by tests
[warning] 53-54: app/indexer.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests
[warning] 57-58: app/indexer.go#L57-L58
Added lines #L57 - L58 were not covered by tests
[warning] 64-64: app/indexer.go#L64
Added line #L64 was not covered by tests
[warning] 69-71: app/indexer.go#L69-L71
Added lines #L69 - L71 were not covered by tests
[warning] 73-75: app/indexer.go#L73-L75
Added lines #L73 - L75 were not covered by tests
[warning] 77-79: app/indexer.go#L77-L79
Added lines #L77 - L79 were not covered by testsapp/blocksdk.go
[warning] 80-81: app/blocksdk.go#L80-L81
Added lines #L80 - L81 were not covered by tests
[warning] 101-102: app/blocksdk.go#L101-L102
Added lines #L101 - L102 were not covered by testsapp/app.go
[warning] 96-96: app/app.go#L96
Added line #L96 was not covered by tests
[warning] 174-174: app/app.go#L174
Added line #L174 was not covered by tests
[warning] 246-247: app/app.go#L246-L247
Added lines #L246 - L247 were not covered by tests
[warning] 251-251: app/app.go#L251
Added line #L251 was not covered by tests
[warning] 253-257: app/app.go#L253-L257
Added lines #L253 - L257 were not covered by tests
[warning] 266-267: app/app.go#L266-L267
Added lines #L266 - L267 were not covered by tests
[warning] 273-273: app/app.go#L273
Added line #L273 was not covered by tests
[warning] 292-292: app/app.go#L292
Added line #L292 was not covered by tests
[warning] 312-312: app/app.go#L312
Added line #L312 was not covered by tests
[warning] 363-363: app/app.go#L363
Added line #L363 was not covered by tests
[warning] 370-373: app/app.go#L370-L373
Added lines #L370 - L373 were not covered by tests
[warning] 398-398: app/app.go#L398
Added line #L398 was not covered by tests
[warning] 401-401: app/app.go#L401
Added line #L401 was not covered by tests
[warning] 429-430: app/app.go#L429-L430
Added lines #L429 - L430 were not covered by tests
[warning] 475-477: app/app.go#L475-L477
Added lines #L475 - L477 were not covered by tests
[warning] 517-517: app/app.go#L517
Added line #L517 was not covered by tests
[warning] 591-592: app/app.go#L591-L592
Added lines #L591 - L592 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (35)
app/indexer.go (2)
30-37: LGTM!The creation of
kvIndexerKeeperlooks good.
85-89: LGTM!The setup of the streaming manager looks good.
app/app_test.go (1)
44-44: Improvement in handling blocked addresses.The loop now iterates over
app.BlockedModuleAccountAddrs(app.ModuleAccountAddrs()), which likely improves the test's accuracy in reflecting the application's behavior regarding module accounts.app/blocksdk.go (4)
38-39: LGTM!The initialization of
signerExtractorlooks good.
40-75: LGTM!The creation of lanes (
systemLane,mevLane,freeLane,defaultLane) looks good.
104-119: LGTM!The setup of lane options looks good.
121-144: LGTM!The creation of checkTx and proposal handlers looks good.
app/app.go (28)
15-22: LGTM!The added import statements are necessary for the new functionality and restructuring of the application.
52-55: LGTM!The added import statements for IBC modules are necessary for the new functionality and restructuring of the application.
56-60: LGTM!The added import statements for initia IBC modules are necessary for the new functionality and restructuring of the application.
65-70: LGTM!The added import statements for initia modules are necessary for the new functionality and restructuring of the application.
73-75: LGTM!The added import statements for local imports are necessary for the new functionality and restructuring of the application.
76-78: LGTM!The added import statements for kvindexer modules are necessary for the new functionality and restructuring of the application.
96-96: LGTM!The
tmos.Exitfunction is used appropriately to handle the error condition when retrieving the user home directory.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 96-96: app/app.go#L96
Added line #L96 was not covered by tests
107-108: LGTM!The inclusion of
keepers.AppKeepersin theMinitiaAppstruct consolidates various keeper instances into a single component, simplifying the management of application state and interactions between different modules.
127-130: LGTM!The inclusion of
kvIndexerKeeperandkvIndexerModulein theMinitiaAppstruct allows for the integration of the kvindexer module, enhancing the indexing capabilities of the application.
145-148: LGTM!The added logging statements provide useful information about the configuration of the application, aiding in debugging and monitoring.
154-155: LGTM!The registration of the
cryptocodecpackage functions with the encoding configuration is necessary for the proper encoding and decoding of crypto-related data.
168-174: LGTM!The retrieval and usage of application options for setting configurations is essential for customizing the application's behavior based on the provided options.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 174-174: app/app.go#L174
Added line #L174 was not covered by tests
184-187: LGTM!The inclusion of address codecs for accounts, validators, and consensus nodes in the
MinitiaAppstruct is necessary for the proper encoding and decoding of these addresses.
197-198: LGTM!The usage of helper functions to set the
moduleAccountAddressesandblockedModuleAccountAddrsvariables improves the readability and maintainability of the code.
200-213: LGTM!The initialization of
AppKeepersusing theNewAppKeeperfunction consolidates various keeper instances into a single component, simplifying the management of application state and interactions between different modules.
220-226: LGTM!The usage of helper functions to initialize the
ModuleManagerandBasicModuleManagerimproves the readability and maintainability of the code.
233-240: LGTM!The usage of helper functions to set the order of module operations and genesis initialization improves the readability and maintainability of the code.
241-247: LGTM!The registration of invariants and services is necessary for the proper functioning of the application.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 246-247: app/app.go#L246-L247
Added lines #L246 - L247 were not covered by tests
249-257: LGTM!The setup and registration of the kvindexer keeper and module, as well as the setting of the streaming manager, are necessary for the proper functioning of the kvindexer module.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 251-251: app/app.go#L251
Added line #L251 was not covered by tests
[warning] 253-257: app/app.go#L253-L257
Added lines #L253 - L257 were not covered by tests
263-267: LGTM!The registration of executor change plans is necessary for the proper functioning of the application.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 266-267: app/app.go#L266-L267
Added lines #L266 - L267 were not covered by tests
273-273: LGTM!The registration of the reflection service server is necessary for the proper functioning of the application.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 273-273: app/app.go#L273
Added line #L273 was not covered by tests
278-280: LGTM!The initialization of the stores is necessary for the proper functioning of the application.
289-292: LGTM!The setup and overriding of the base-app's handlers are necessary for the proper functioning of the BlockSDK.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 292-292: app/app.go#L292
Added line #L292 was not covered by tests
295-306: LGTM!The overriding of the base-app's handlers is necessary for the proper functioning of the application.
312-312: LGTM!The retrieval of the merged registry of proto files is necessary for validating proto annotations.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 312-312: app/app.go#L312
Added line #L312 was not covered by tests
363-363: LGTM!The
tmos.Exitfunction is used appropriately to handle the error condition when creating the post handler.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 363-363: app/app.go#L363
Added line #L363 was not covered by tests
370-374: LGTM!The addition of the
SetKVIndexerfunction allows for the integration of the kvindexer module, enhancing the indexing capabilities of the application.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 370-373: app/app.go#L370-L373
Added lines #L370 - L373 were not covered by tests
398-401: LGTM!The
tmos.Exitfunction is used appropriately to handle the error conditions when unmarshalling the genesis state or setting the moduleTools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 398-398: app/app.go#L398
Added line #L398 was not covered by tests
[warning] 401-401: app/app.go#L401
Added line #L401 was not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (4)
Line range hint
1-50:
Add tests for the new/ibc/core/client/v1/verify_membershipendpoint.The new endpoint allows clients to verify membership proofs. Ensure that comprehensive tests are added to cover various scenarios, including success and error responses.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
51-100:
Add tests for the new/opinit/opchild/v1/base_denom/{denom}endpoint.The new endpoint enables clients to query base denominations. Ensure that comprehensive tests are added to cover various scenarios, including success and error responses.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
101-150:
Add tests for the new sequence number endpoints.The new endpoints provide the next sequence numbers for L1 and L2. Ensure that comprehensive tests are added to cover various scenarios, including success and error responses.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
151-200:
Add tests for the new/slinky/oracle/v1/get_currency_pair_mappingendpoint.The new endpoint allows for retrieving mappings of currency pair IDs to their respective currency pairs. Ensure that comprehensive tests are added to cover various scenarios, including success and error responses.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
scripts/protocgen-pulsar.sh (1)
26-26: Directory./minimovedoes not exist and no.protofiles were found.The directory
./minimovedoes not exist, and no.protofiles were found in the repository. Please verify the correct directory path for the.protofiles.Analysis chain
Verify the new directory path for
.protofiles.The directory path has been changed from
./minitiato./minimove. Ensure that the new directory contains the necessary.protofiles for processing.
Verify the existence of the
./minimovedirectory and.protofiles.The directory
./minimovedoes not exist, which could indicate an incorrect change. Please verify if the directory path is correct and if it contains.protofiles.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new directory path for `.proto` files. # Test: List the `.proto` files in the new directory. Expect: The directory contains the necessary `.proto` files. find ./minimove -name '*.proto'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the `./minimove` directory and `.proto` files. # Test: Check if the `./minimove` directory exists. if [ -d "./minimove" ]; then echo "Directory ./minimove exists." else echo "Directory ./minimove does not exist." fi # Test: List all `.proto` files in the repository to find the correct directory. find . -name '*.proto'Length of output: 131
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (30 hunks)
- scripts/protocgen-pulsar.sh (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (1)
Line range hint
201-250:
Verify the updates to existing definitions.The updates include transitioning from singular properties to arrays and refining descriptions. Ensure that these changes are consistent across the codebase and do not introduce any breaking changes.
Description
need to wait until initia-labs/cometbft#5 merged.
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
AppKeepersstructure.