feat: add golangci #7
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve enhancements to code quality and error handling across various files. A new GolangCI-Lint configuration has been added, enabling and disabling specific linters. The Makefile has been updated to include new linting targets. Workflow adjustments in GitHub Actions improve the linting process. Several files have been modified to streamline error handling, particularly in relation to temporary file management and user input handling. Integration tests for the Initia and Minitia applications have been introduced, while some tests have been deleted or commented out, reflecting a restructuring of testing strategies. Changes
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Makefile (1)
38-43: Consider CI/CD integration for lintingThe new linting targets would be valuable in a CI/CD pipeline to ensure code quality on every PR.
Consider:
- Adding a GitHub Action that runs
make linton pull requests- Configuring the action to post lint results as PR comments
- Setting up pre-commit hooks locally using these targets
Would you like assistance in setting up the CI integration?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.golangci.yml(1 hunks)Makefile(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .golangci.yml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Makefile (1)
38-43: Verify .golangci.yml configuration
The linting targets require a .golangci.yml configuration file to function properly.
Let's verify the configuration file:
✅ Verification successful
Configuration file is present and properly configured
The .golangci.yml exists in the repository root and contains valid configuration for the linting targets in the Makefile. The configuration:
- Explicitly enables most linters with selective disabling of specific ones
- Configures error checking exclusions for common patterns
- Sets appropriate complexity thresholds
- Excludes tests from linting
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if .golangci.yml exists and is properly formatted
if [ -f ".golangci.yml" ]; then
echo "Found .golangci.yml"
# Verify YAML syntax
if command -v yamllint >/dev/null 2>&1; then
yamllint .golangci.yml
else
cat .golangci.yml
fi
else
echo "Error: .golangci.yml not found in repository root"
# Search for it in case it's in a different location
fd -t f .golangci.yml
fi
Length of output: 545
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
models/relayer/init.go (2)
Line range hint
28-28: Ensure Consistent URL Scheme inserverAddrIt's great that you're trimming the
grpc://prefix fromserverAddr. However, consider handling other URL schemes (likehttp://orhttps://) or invalid prefixes to make theCheckHealthmethod more robust.
783-783: Correct Grammar in Prompt QuestionIn the
FundingAmountSelectstruct, consider correcting the grammar in the question for better readability. Change "Please select the filling amount option" to "Please select the funding amount option."Apply this diff to fix the text:
func NewFundingAmountSelect(ctx context.Context) *FundingAmountSelect { // ... return &FundingAmountSelect{ Selector: ui.Selector[FundingAmountSelectOption]{ Options: []FundingAmountSelectOption{ FundingDefaultPreset, FundingFillManually, FundingUserTransfer, }, CannotBack: true, }, BaseModel: weavecontext.BaseModel{Ctx: ctx, CannotBack: true}, - question: "Please select the filling amount option", + question: "Please select the funding amount option", } }models/minitia/launch.go (1)
2173-2173: Remove Unnecessary Empty LineThere's an unnecessary empty line at line 2173. Cleaning up such lines improves code readability.
Apply this diff to remove the empty line:
if state.downloadedNewCelestiaBinary { - state.weave.PushPreviousResponse(styles.RenderPreviousResponse(styles.NoSeparator, "Celestia binary has been successfully downloaded.", []string{}, "")) }client/grpc.go (1)
28-28: Trim All URL Schemes inCheckHealthMethodCurrently, only the
grpc://prefix is trimmed fromserverAddr. To make theCheckHealthmethod more flexible, consider trimming other URL schemes likehttp://orhttps://to ensure the address is correctly formatted forgrpc.Dial.Apply this diff to trim common URL schemes:
func (g *GRPCClient) CheckHealth(serverAddr string) error { - serverAddr = strings.TrimPrefix(serverAddr, "grpc://") + serverAddr = strings.TrimPrefix(serverAddr, "grpc://") + serverAddr = strings.TrimPrefix(serverAddr, "http://") + serverAddr = strings.TrimPrefix(serverAddr, "https://").github/workflows/basic-checks.yml (1)
30-30: Quote Variables to Prevent Globbing and Word SplittingIn the shell script, consider quoting the variable
${GOLANGCI_LINT_VERSION}to prevent globbing and word splitting issues.Apply this diff to quote the variable:
# ... - run: go install github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/cmd/golangci-lint@${GOLANGCI_LINT_VERSION} + - run: go install github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/cmd/golangci-lint@"${GOLANGCI_LINT_VERSION}"🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
30-30: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:64: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
models/minitia/tx.go (1)
118-122: Improve error handling and loggingWhile the error handling for file deletion is improved, there are some enhancements that could be made:
Consider these improvements:
defer func() { if err := io.DeleteFile(rawTxPath); err != nil { - fmt.Printf("failed to delete raw tx file: %v", err) + fmt.Printf("failed to delete raw tx file: %v\n", err) + // Consider logging to a proper logging system } }()Suggestions:
- Add newline to error message for better formatting
- Consider using a proper logging system instead of fmt.Printf
- Consider propagating the error if it's critical for cleanup
cosmosutils/keys.go (1)
334-339: Improve error logging in deferred file cleanupWhile the error handling is good, consider these improvements for better debugging and consistency:
- Use a proper logging mechanism instead of fmt.Printf
- Include the filepath in the error message
defer func() { if err := io.DeleteFile(tempMnemonicPath); err != nil { - fmt.Printf("failed to delete temp mnemonic file: %v", err) + log.Printf("failed to delete temp mnemonic file %s: %v", tempMnemonicPath, err) } }()
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
.github/workflows/basic-checks.yml(1 hunks).golangci.yml(1 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)client/grpc.go(2 hunks)cmd/opinit_bots.go(2 hunks)cosmosutils/keys.go(2 hunks)models/minitia/launch.go(1 hunks)models/minitia/tx.go(1 hunks)models/relayer/init.go(2 hunks)service/launchd.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/alias.go(0 hunks)tests/integration/gas_station_test.go(0 hunks)tests/integration/initia_test.go(0 hunks)tests/integration/minitia_test.go(0 hunks)tests/integration/opinit_test.go(0 hunks)tests/integration/testutil.go(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
- tests/integration/alias.go
- tests/integration/gas_station_test.go
- tests/integration/minitia_test.go
- tests/integration/opinit_test.go
- tests/integration/initia_test.go
- tests/integration/testutil.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- cmd/opinit_bots.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .golangci.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/basic-checks.yml
18-18: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
19-19: the runner of "actions/setup-go@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
30-30: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:64: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
client/grpc.go (1)
19-19: Consider Re-adding Connection Field if Needed
The conn field was removed from the GRPCClient struct. If the client maintains persistent connections elsewhere in the codebase, consider re-adding this field to manage connections efficiently.
Run the following script to search for usages of GRPCClient.conn in the codebase:
Makefile (2)
38-43: Enhance the lint target with best practices
The lint target should include proper dependency checks and documentation.
Previous review already suggested these improvements:
- Add dependency on
check_version - Add golangci-lint installation check
- Add help text for documentation
45-50: Add safety measures for automatic fixes
The lint-fix target needs proper safety measures as it modifies files automatically.
Previous review already suggested these improvements:
- Add clear warning about automatic modifications
- Add confirmation prompt
- Add installation check
- Add dependency on
check_version
cosmosutils/keys.go (1)
378-383: Security: Strengthen error handling in key management operations
The current changes introduce a pattern of ignoring errors in key management operations. Given that key management is security-critical:
- All key deletion operations should be properly handled and logged
- Consider implementing a robust key rotation strategy that ensures atomic operations
- Add logging for audit trails of key management operations
This is particularly important as this code handles relayer keys which are critical for inter-chain communication.
Let's verify if there are similar patterns elsewhere in the codebase:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
.github/workflows/basic-checks.yml (1)
22-28: Note about conditional linting behaviorThe
get-diff-actionwill make linting conditional on changes to Go files, go.mod, or go.sum. This optimizes CI performance but means linting won't run if only other files change. Consider if this is the desired behavior for your project.tests/integration/initia_test/initia_test.go (6)
58-60: Remove redundant type assertionThe type assertion and subsequent
assert.True(t, ok)in lines 58-60 are redundant becauseassert.IsTypein line 56 already checks the type offinalModel. You can remove these lines to simplify the code.
139-141: Remove redundant type assertionThe type assertion and subsequent
assert.True(t, ok)in lines 139-141 are redundant becauseassert.IsTypein line 137 already checks the type offinalModel. Removing these lines will clean up the code.
211-213: Remove redundant type assertionThe type assertion and subsequent
assert.True(t, ok)in lines 211-213 are redundant becauseassert.IsTypein line 209 already verifies the type offinalModel. You can remove these lines to streamline the code.
282-284: Remove redundant type assertionThe type assertion and subsequent
assert.True(t, ok)in lines 282-284 are redundant becauseassert.IsTypein line 280 already confirms the type offinalModel. Removing these lines will simplify your tests.
19-85: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication in test functionsThe test functions from lines 19-401 contain significant duplicated code in setup, execution steps, and assertions. Consider extracting common logic into helper functions to improve maintainability and reduce repetition.
Also applies to: 87-167, 169-239, 241-401
42-46: Simplify file existence checks for better readabilityIn the
WaitForconditions at lines 42-46, 110-114, 198-202, and 270-274, you can simplify the file existence checks by directly checking iferr == nil. This makes the code cleaner and handles any potential errors.Consider changing the code to:
WaitFor(func() bool { _, err := os.Stat(initiaHome) return err == nil }),Also applies to: 110-114, 198-202, 270-274
tests/integration/gas_station_test/gas_station_test.go (1)
21-23: Remove redundant type assertionThe type assertion and subsequent
assert.True(t, ok)in lines 21-23 are redundant becauseassert.IsTypein line 19 already verifies the type offinalModel. You can remove these lines to streamline the code.tests/integration/testutil.go (1)
Line range hint
103-128: Improve error handling inGetTomlValueandGetJsonValuefunctionsCurrently, when a key is not found during traversal in the
GetTomlValueandGetJsonValuefunctions (lines 103-128 and 139-164), the functions returnnil, nil. Consider returning an error when a key is not found to provide clearer feedback and assist in debugging.Also applies to: 139-164
tests/integration/minitia_test/minitia_test.go (2)
20-20: Clarify the reason for skipping the testTestMinitiaLaunchWithExistingThe test
TestMinitiaLaunchWithExistingis currently skipped at line 20. If this is intentional, please provide a comment explaining why the test is skipped, or enable the test if it's ready to be executed.
82-84: Remove redundant type assertionThe type assertion and subsequent
assert.True(t, ok)in lines 82-84 are redundant becauseassert.IsTypein line 80 already checks the type offinalModel. Removing these lines will simplify your test code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/workflows/basic-checks.yml(1 hunks)tests/integration/alias.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/gas_station_test/gas_station_test.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/initia_test/initia_test.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/minitia_test/minitia_test.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/opinit_test/opinit_test.go(1 hunks)tests/integration/testutil.go(6 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tests/integration/opinit_test/opinit_test.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/integration/alias.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/basic-checks.yml
18-18: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
19-19: the runner of "actions/setup-go@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
29-29: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:64: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/basic-checks.yml (2)
13-15: LGTM! Well-structured environment configuration
Good practice to pin the golangci-lint version explicitly. The job name change better reflects its specific purpose.
30-31: Verify the make lint target exists
The workflow uses make lint but we should verify that this target is properly defined in the Makefile.
✅ Verification successful
make lint target is properly defined and configured
The Makefile contains a well-defined lint target that:
- Depends on
check_versiontarget - Verifies golangci-lint is installed
- Runs golangci-lint with appropriate timeout and output format settings
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the lint target exists in Makefile
# Expected: Find a lint target that uses golangci-lint
rg -A 5 '^lint:' Makefile
Length of output: 399
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/build-release.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-108: Workflow architecture follows GitHub Actions best practices.The workflow demonstrates good practices:
- Proper job dependencies and sequencing
- Secure token handling
- Efficient artifact management
- Well-structured cross-platform builds
Consider adding SHA256 checksums for the released binaries to enhance security and verification capabilities.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/basic-checks.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/build-release.yml(3 hunks).github/workflows/integration-tests.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/on-workflow-end.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/basic-checks.yml
29-29: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:64: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
.github/workflows/integration-tests.yml (1)
21-25: LGTM! Action versions and Go version specification updated appropriately.
The changes follow best practices:
- Using latest stable versions of GitHub Actions
- Using semver range for Go version specification
.github/workflows/basic-checks.yml (5)
13-14: LGTM! Environment variable properly defined for golangci-lint version.
The version is pinned to a specific release which helps maintain reproducible builds.
18-21: LGTM! Action versions and Go version specification updated appropriately.
The changes follow best practices and maintain consistency with other workflow files.
22-28: LGTM! Efficient use of get-diff-action.
The pattern matching ensures linting is performed only on relevant Go-related files.
35-38: LGTM! Consistent action versions in unit-tests job.
The changes maintain consistency with the linting job configuration.
29-29:
Add quotes around environment variable usage.
The environment variable should be properly quoted to prevent potential issues with word splitting.
Apply this diff:
- - run: go install github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/cmd/golangci-lint@${GOLANGCI_LINT_VERSION}
+ - run: go install github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/cmd/golangci-lint@"${GOLANGCI_LINT_VERSION}"Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
29-29: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:64: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/on-workflow-end.yaml (4)
13-13: LGTM! Action version updated appropriately.
The update to actions/checkout@v4 maintains consistency with other workflow files.
Line range hint 15-19: LGTM! Secure handling of Slack user mapping.
The workflow properly handles the case when a GitHub user doesn't have a mapped Slack ID by defaulting to "Unknown".
Line range hint 21-31: LGTM! Well-structured conditional notification logic.
The notification variables are properly set based on the workflow conclusion, with clear differentiation between success and failure cases.
Line range hint 33-44: LGTM! Secure usage of Slack webhook.
The workflow:
- Uses secrets for the webhook URL
- Properly formats messages
- Includes relevant workflow context in notifications
.github/workflows/build-release.yml (3)
32-36: LGTM! Consistent version updates across jobs.
The version updates match those in the basic-checks job, maintaining consistency throughout the workflow.
14-18: LGTM! Action version updates look good.
The updates to action versions and Go version specification follow best practices:
actions/checkout@v4brings security improvementsactions/setup-go@v5includes better caching- Using
^1.22allows for compatible minor version updates
Let's verify the Go version compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Go version update to 1.22 is appropriate and verified
The go.mod file confirms that the project is already using Go 1.22.6, which aligns perfectly with the workflow's ^1.22 specification. The repository contains numerous Go files that will benefit from the latest Go toolchain features and improvements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if any Go files require features specific to Go 1.22
rg -l 'go1\.22' --type go
Length of output: 27
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the go.mod file for Go version requirement
cat go.mod 2>/dev/null || echo "No go.mod found"
# Let's also check if there are any Go files in the repository
fd -e go . 2>/dev/null || echo "No .go files found"
Length of output: 5299
52-56: LGTM! Version updates maintain cross-platform build compatibility.
The version updates are consistent with other jobs while preserving the cross-compilation setup.
Let's verify the build flags compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Version updates are compatible with build configuration
The workflow file shows that the build process is well-structured with:
- Proper handling of enabled flags from
enabled_flags.txt - Correct usage of build flags in
-ldflagsfor version and feature flags - Maintained cross-platform compilation for all target architectures
- No breaking changes in the build configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if enabled_flags.txt exists and is properly formatted
if [ -f "enabled_flags.txt" ]; then
echo "Checking enabled_flags.txt format..."
cat enabled_flags.txt
else
echo "Warning: enabled_flags.txt not found"
fi
# Check for any custom build flag usage in Go files
rg -l 'github\.com/initia-labs/weave/(cmd|flags)\.' --type go
Length of output: 216
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the build flags and compilation settings in the workflow file
cat .github/workflows/build-release.yml
# Also check for any build-related flags or tags in Go files
rg -g '*.go' '//\s*\+build' -A 2
# Look for any build constraint or compilation directives
rg -g '*.go' 'go:build' -A 2
Length of output: 3415
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Refactor
Bug Fixes
Chores