update ci image and tests

[Naseem77]

User description

update falkordb image in ci
remove unnecessary logging
update settings config tests

---

PR Type

Enhancement, Tests

---

Description

• Updated CI configuration to use the latest FalkorDB image.

• Refactored tests to use dynamic input data for better maintainability.

• Removed unnecessary logging statements in API calls and tests.

• Simplified and optimized test logic for settings configuration.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	apiCalls.ts Removed redundant logging in API calls                                      e2e/logic/api/apiCalls.ts Removed unnecessary logging from API call methods. +0/-1
Tests	settingsConfig.spec.ts Refactored and optimized settings configuration tests        e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts Refactored tests to use dynamic input data. Removed unnecessary logging and redundant code. Simplified test logic for settings configuration. +29/-40  settingsUsers.spec.ts Cleaned up settings users test file                                            e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts Removed commented-out code for cleaner test files. +1/-1
Configuration changes	playwright.yml Updated FalkorDB image in CI configuration                              .github/workflows/playwright.yml Updated FalkorDB image to use the latest version in CI. +1/-1

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
falkordb-browser	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Feb 5, 2025 11:46am

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[qodo-merge-pro]

Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here.

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Test Reliability The test for maxInfoQueries was simplified by removing retry logic and delay. This could make the test less reliable if there are timing issues with the API response. test(`@admin Modify maxInfoQueries via UI validation via API: Input value: ${Data.roleModificationData[8].input}`, async () => { const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input) await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage(); await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable(); await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries); const apiCall = new ApiCalls() let value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]); expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input); await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000"); }); Version Control Using 'latest' tag for FalkorDB image in CI could lead to inconsistent test results as it may pull different versions in different runs. Consider using a specific version tag. image: falkordb/falkordb:latest

[qodo-merge-pro]

Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here.

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Verify user deletion success Add error handling for the case when user deletion fails. The test should verify the deletion was successful before proceeding. e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts [144-147] const users = await apiCall.getUsers() await apiCall.deleteUsers({ users: [{ username }] }) +const usersAfterDeletion = await apiCall.getUsers() const User = users.result.find(u => u.username === username); +const UserAfterDeletion = usersAfterDeletion.result.find(u => u.username === username); expect(User?.username === username).toBe(true) +expect(UserAfterDeletion).toBeUndefined() Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion adds crucial verification of user deletion success, preventing false positives and ensuring data cleanup is properly executed, which is essential for test isolation and reliability.	8
	Add robust API response validation The test for maxInfoQueries should include proper error handling and timeout configuration for the API call. Remove the direct string comparison and add type checking for the response value. e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts [221-231] test(`@admin Modify maxInfoQueries via UI validation via API: Input value: ${Data.roleModificationData[8].input}`, async () => { const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input) await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage(); await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable(); - await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries); + const uiValue = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries); const apiCall = new ApiCalls() - let value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]); - expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input); + const response = await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries); + expect(response?.config?.[1]?.toString()).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input); + expect(uiValue).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input); await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000"); }); Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion improves test reliability by adding proper type checking and validation of both UI and API responses, ensuring the test catches potential data inconsistencies between UI and API layers.	7