-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Staging #614
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThis pull request updates multiple aspects of the codebase. The workflows and Docker configurations now use Node.js version 22. In the graph and schema modules, new functions and revised method signatures add boolean parameters to enhance schema processing. Several UI components are improved with typo fixes, state management adjustments, event handling, and layout refinements. CSS classes and layouts were updated for visual consistency. Additionally, end-to-end tests and Playwright configurations were enhanced, and a new utility function for converting hex colors to HSL format was introduced. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant EditorComponent
participant SuggestionAPI
participant SuggestionProvider
User->>EditorComponent: Enter query/input
EditorComponent->>SuggestionAPI: Call fetchSuggestions(query)
SuggestionAPI-->>EditorComponent: Return suggestions
EditorComponent->>SuggestionProvider: Update suggestions
SuggestionProvider-->>EditorComponent: Render suggestions
sequenceDiagram
participant UI
participant GraphView
participant GraphModel
participant ExtendFunctions
UI->>GraphView: Request graph creation
GraphView->>GraphModel: Call Graph.create(name, result, collapsed, isSchema, colors)
GraphModel->>ExtendFunctions: Call extend, extendNode, extendEdge (with isSchema)
ExtendFunctions-->>GraphModel: Return extended nodes/edges
GraphModel-->>GraphView: Return configured graph instance
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
app/api/graph/model.ts (1)
8-29
: Consider returning boolean values forunique
andrequired
The function
getSchemaValue
assigns string values"true"
and"false"
tounique
andrequired
. For better type safety and clarity, consider using boolean valuestrue
andfalse
instead.Apply this diff to adjust the function:
const getSchemaValue = (value: string): [string, string, boolean, boolean] => { - let unique, required, type, description + let unique: boolean, required: boolean, type: string, description: string if (value.includes("!")) { value = value.replace("!", "") - unique = "true" + unique = true } else { - unique = "false" + unique = false } if (value.includes("*")) { value = value.replace("*", "") - required = "true" + required = true } else { - required = "false" + required = false } if (value.includes("-")) { [type, description] = value.split("-") } else { type = "string" description = "" } return [type, description, unique, required] }app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (1)
61-80
: Improved resize handling with ResizeObserver.The new implementation offers several advantages:
- Uses modern ResizeObserver API for efficient size tracking
- Includes window resize listener as a fallback
- Properly cleans up listeners in the cleanup function
Consider adding a fallback for browsers that don't support ResizeObserver:
useEffect(() => { const handleResize = () => { if (!parentRef.current) return setParentWidth(parentRef.current.clientWidth) setParentHeight(parentRef.current.clientHeight) } handleResize() - const resizeObserver = new ResizeObserver(handleResize) - if (parentRef.current) { - resizeObserver.observe(parentRef.current) - } + let resizeObserver: ResizeObserver | undefined; + if (typeof ResizeObserver !== 'undefined') { + resizeObserver = new ResizeObserver(handleResize) + if (parentRef.current) { + resizeObserver.observe(parentRef.current) + } + } window.addEventListener('resize', handleResize) return () => { - resizeObserver.disconnect() + resizeObserver?.disconnect() window.removeEventListener('resize', handleResize) } }, [])
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
app/api/graph/model.ts
(8 hunks)app/components/EditorComponent.tsx
(4 hunks)app/components/ForceGraph.tsx
(1 hunks)app/graph/GraphView.tsx
(2 hunks)app/graph/Selector.tsx
(1 hunks)app/graph/View.tsx
(3 hunks)app/graph/page.tsx
(2 hunks)app/schema/SchemaCreateElement.tsx
(2 hunks)app/schema/SchemaDataPanel.tsx
(1 hunks)app/schema/SchemaView.tsx
(3 hunks)app/schema/page.tsx
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- app/schema/SchemaCreateElement.tsx
- app/graph/GraphView.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (14)
app/schema/page.tsx (1)
49-49
: Verify thatjson.result
has the expected structureEnsure that
json.result
conforms to the expected structure{ data: Data, metadata: any[] }
when passing it toGraph.create
. This will prevent potential runtime errors due to mismatched data formats.app/graph/page.tsx (1)
90-90
: Ensureresult
passed toGraph.create
has the correct structureVerify that
result
conforms to the expected structure{ data: Data, metadata: any[] }
when callingGraph.create
. Inconsistent data formats can lead to runtime errors or unexpected behavior.Also applies to: 103-103
app/graph/View.tsx (3)
45-45
: LGTM! UI improvements for better content handling.The addition of
overflow-hidden
and padding classes improves the visual presentation and content containment.Also applies to: 47-47
159-159
: Improved button disable logic.The new condition using
every
method provides a more accurate way to check color presence.
22-24
: Verify the impact of new Graph.create parameters.The addition of
false, true
parameters toGraph.create
needs verification to ensure it doesn't affect existing graph behavior.Run this script to check other usages of
Graph.create
:✅ Verification successful
Graph.create parameters are consistent with codebase patterns
The
false, true
parameters inGraph.create
align with the established pattern where schema-related components use these exact parameters, while graph-related components usefalse, false
. The change appears to be intentional to align the behavior with other schema views.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Graph.create calls to verify parameter consistency ast-grep --pattern 'Graph.create($_, $_, $_, $_)'Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Graph.create with different parameter counts and implementation echo "=== Graph.create with 3 params ===" ast-grep --pattern 'Graph.create($_, $_, $_)' echo -e "\n=== Graph.create with 5 params ===" ast-grep --pattern 'Graph.create($_, $_, $_, $_, $_)' echo -e "\n=== Graph.create implementation ===" ast-grep --pattern 'create($$$) { $$$ }' # Fallback to ripgrep for any other potential usages echo -e "\n=== Other Graph.create references ===" rg "Graph.create" -A 2Length of output: 2159
app/schema/SchemaView.tsx (4)
31-38
: Enhanced attribute formatting with special markers.The new formatting logic improves attribute representation by:
- Adding
!
for required fields (u === "true"
)- Adding
*
for repeatable fields (r === "true"
)- Adding
-${d}
for default values
41-41
: LGTM! Updated query construction with formatted attributes.The queries now correctly use the formatted attributes for both node and edge creation.
Also applies to: 43-43
349-349
: Improved toolbar disable condition.The condition now correctly checks both user role and schema existence.
304-304
: Verify the impact of new extension parameters.The addition of
false, true
parameters toextendNode
andextendEdge
needs verification.Run this script to check other extension calls:
Also applies to: 307-307
app/components/EditorComponent.tsx (4)
81-81
: LGTM! Fixed typo in keyword.The correction from "MARGE" to "MERGE" ensures accurate auto-completion and syntax highlighting.
360-361
: LGTM! Fixed memory leak.Properly disposing of the old suggestion provider before creating a new one prevents memory leaks and potential conflicts.
475-475
: LGTM! Enhanced cleanup function.Added proper disposal of the suggestion provider during component cleanup, preventing memory leaks.
Also applies to: 477-477
572-572
: LGTM! Improved initial state.Setting
isFirstLine
totrue
initially is more accurate as the cursor starts at the first line, ensuring proper behavior of history navigation.app/schema/SchemaDataPanel.tsx (1)
146-146
: LGTM! Enhanced attributes count display.The improved styling with larger font size, bold weight, and primary color highlight makes the count more prominent and visually appealing.
…lity - Updated dynamic import for EditorComponent in GraphView for better readability. - Modified Toolbar to conditionally display add buttons based on the new displayAdd prop. - Removed hardcoded creation date from Selector component. - Adjusted disabled state logic in SchemaView and Toolbar to account for user roles. - Improved animation control visibility in GraphView based on graph elements.
- Added a Sheet component for displaying additional information about the application.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
app/settings/Configurations.tsx (2)
141-150
: Enhance validation for MAX_INFO_QUERIES.While the upper bound check is good, consider adding validations for:
- Negative numbers
- Non-numeric input (NaN)
if (name === "MAX_INFO_QUERIES") { - if (Number(value) > 1000) { + const numValue = Number(value); + if (isNaN(numValue)) { + toast({ + title: "Error", + description: "Value must be a valid number", + variant: "destructive" + }); + return false; + } + if (numValue > 1000 || numValue < 0) { toast({ title: "Error", - description: "Value must be less than 1000", + description: "Value must be between 0 and 1000", variant: "destructive" }); return false; } }
159-159
: Remove unnecessary whitespace.This line contains only whitespace changes that don't affect functionality.
- +app/components/Header.tsx (2)
55-109
: Consider accessibility and type safety improvements.While the navigation structure is well-organized, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
- Add
aria-label
to the navigation menu for better accessibility- Consider handling the case when
onSetGraphName
is undefined instead of using non-null assertionApply these changes:
- <NavigationMenu> + <NavigationMenu aria-label="Main">- onSetGraphName={onSetGraphName!} + onSetGraphName={onSetGraphName ?? (() => {})}
110-127
: Simplify version display.The version display uses unnecessary template literal syntax with curly braces.
Apply this change:
- <p>Version: {`{${pkg.version}}`}</p> + <p>Version: {pkg.version}</p>app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (1)
115-131
: Consider improving the double-click prevention logic.The current implementation might incorrectly prevent legitimate clicks on different nodes if they share the same name, as it uses the node name for comparison.
Consider using the node's unique ID instead:
- if (now.getTime() - date.getTime() < 1000 && name === (node.data.name || node.id.toString())) { + if (now.getTime() - date.getTime() < 1000 && name === node.id.toString()) { return } - lastClick.current = { date: new Date(), name: node.data.name || node.id.toString() } + lastClick.current = { date: new Date(), name: node.id.toString() }app/login/LoginForm.tsx (2)
124-124
: Consider improving image dimensions handling.While adding the
priority
prop is good for performance, the current dimensions (width=500, height=1) might cause aspect ratio issues and lack responsiveness.Consider using responsive dimensions and maintaining aspect ratio:
- <Image priority src="/BrowserLogo.svg" alt="Loading..." width={500} height={1} /> + <Image + priority + src="/BrowserLogo.svg" + alt="FalkorDB Browser Logo" + className="w-full max-w-[500px] h-auto" + width={500} + height={100} + />
81-108
: Consider enhancing form validation and error handling.The current error handling uses a generic "Invalid credentials" message. Consider implementing:
- Input validation for host and port
- More specific error messages based on the error type
- Rate limiting for login attempts
Example implementation for input validation:
const onSubmit = async (e: FormEvent) => { e.preventDefault(); + + // Validate host format + const hostRegex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9]([a-zA-Z0-9-]{0,61}[a-zA-Z0-9])?(\.[a-zA-Z0-9]([a-zA-Z0-9-]{0,61}[a-zA-Z0-9])?)*$/; + if (!hostRegex.test(host.trim())) { + setError({ + message: "Invalid host format", + show: true + }); + return; + } + + // Validate port range + const portNum = parseInt(port.trim()); + if (isNaN(portNum) || portNum < 1 || portNum > 65535) { + setError({ + message: "Port must be between 1 and 65535", + show: true + }); + return; + } const params: SignInOptions = {app/components/CreateGraph.tsx (1)
37-58
: Optimize form submission and error handling.The form submission logic could be improved in several ways:
- Early return pattern for validation
- Consistent error handling
- Loading state during API call
Consider this improved implementation:
+const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false) const handleCreateGraph = async (e: React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) => { e.preventDefault() + setIsLoading(true) + try { const name = graphName.trim() if (!name) { toast({ title: "Error", description: "Graph name cannot be empty", variant: "destructive" }) + setIsLoading(false) return } const q = 'RETURN 1' const result = await securedFetch(`api/graph/${prepareArg(name)}/?query=${prepareArg(q)}`, { method: "GET", }, toast) - if (!result.ok) return + if (!result.ok) { + setIsLoading(false) + return + } onSetGraphName(name) setGraphName("") setOpen(false) + } catch (error) { + toast({ + title: "Error", + description: "Failed to create graph", + variant: "destructive" + }) + } finally { + setIsLoading(false) + } }app/graph/labels.tsx (1)
60-60
: Extract color manipulation logic to improve readability.The inline style condition makes the code harder to read and maintain. Consider extracting this logic to a separate function or using CSS classes.
Consider this improved implementation:
+const getCategoryColor = (graph: Graph, category: Category, isRelationshipType: boolean) => { + const baseColor = graph.getCategoryColorValue(category.index); + return isRelationshipType ? lightenColor(baseColor) : baseColor; +} -<div style={{ backgroundColor: label === "RelationshipTypes" ? lightenColor(graph.getCategoryColorValue(category.index)) : graph.getCategoryColorValue(category.index) }} className={cn("min-w-6 min-h-6 rounded-full")} /> +<div + style={{ backgroundColor: getCategoryColor(graph, category, label === "RelationshipTypes") }} + className={cn("min-w-6 min-h-6 rounded-full")} +/>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
app/components/CreateGraph.tsx
(2 hunks)app/components/EditorComponent.tsx
(14 hunks)app/components/ForceGraph.tsx
(6 hunks)app/components/Header.tsx
(3 hunks)app/components/ui/Dropzone.tsx
(1 hunks)app/components/ui/combobox.tsx
(1 hunks)app/graph/GraphDataPanel.tsx
(0 hunks)app/graph/GraphView.tsx
(3 hunks)app/graph/Selector.tsx
(1 hunks)app/graph/labels.tsx
(2 hunks)app/graph/page.tsx
(3 hunks)app/login/LoginForm.tsx
(2 hunks)app/schema/page.tsx
(2 hunks)app/settings/Configurations.tsx
(1 hunks)lib/utils.ts
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/graph/GraphDataPanel.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/graph/GraphView.tsx
- app/graph/Selector.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (14)
app/components/Header.tsx (2)
12-14
: LGTM! Well-structured imports.The new imports are properly organized and follow best practices.
130-130
: LGTM! Consistent class naming.The class name change maintains styling consistency.
app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (3)
9-9
: LGTM! Added utility import for link color manipulation.The addition of
lightenColor
utility is well-aligned with the new link styling enhancements.
54-73
: Excellent implementation of resize handling!The resize handling implementation is robust and follows best practices:
- Uses ResizeObserver for accurate element size tracking
- Handles both element and window resize events
- Properly cleans up listeners to prevent memory leaks
257-303
: Great improvements to link styling and visibility!The enhancements significantly improve the graph's usability:
- Added background block for better label readability
- Directional arrows clearly show relationships
- Color variations effectively highlight interaction states
app/login/LoginForm.tsx (2)
121-121
: LGTM! Background styling moved to layout level.The removal of
bg-foreground
class aligns with the architectural changes where background styling is now handled at the layout level.
145-145
: Verify the gradient styling implementation.The class name change from 'Top' to 'Gradient' should be verified to ensure consistent styling across the application.
Let's check the CSS implementation:
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for both old and new class names in CSS files echo "Searching for old class name 'Top':" rg -l "\.Top\s*{" --type css echo "Searching for new class name 'Gradient':" rg -l "\.Gradient\s*{" --type cssLength of output: 424
Let's re-run the search using a corrected regex that properly escapes the curly braces. This should help us verify the presence (or absence) of the CSS classes.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash echo "Searching for old class name 'Top' in CSS files:" rg -l "\\.Top\\s*\\{" --type css || echo "No matches found for '.Top'" echo "Searching for new class name 'Gradient' in CSS files:" rg -l "\\.Gradient\\s*\\{" --type css || echo "No matches found for '.Gradient'"Length of output: 391
Gradient styling implementation verified.
- The old class
.Top
is no longer present.- The new class
.Gradient
is defined inapp/globals.css
, confirming the intended update.app/components/ui/Dropzone.tsx (1)
59-59
: LGTM! Enhanced cursor styling.The cursor styling changes provide better visual feedback about the interactivity of the "Upload Certificate" text based on the disabled state.
app/graph/page.tsx (1)
132-132
: LGTM! Added setHistoryQueries prop.The new prop correctly updates the queries state while preserving metadata.
app/components/ui/combobox.tsx (1)
112-116
: LGTM! Improved empty value handling and key uniqueness.The changes enhance the component by:
- Displaying empty options as '""' for better visibility
- Ensuring key uniqueness by adding the 'key-' prefix
app/components/EditorComponent.tsx (4)
74-74
: Fixed keyword typo.Corrected the misspelled keyword from "MARGE" to "MERGE".
236-250
: LGTM! Added ResizeObserver for better layout handling.The ResizeObserver implementation ensures that the editor layout is updated correctly when the container size changes.
180-196
: LGTM! Improved suggestions handling.The changes enhance the suggestions mechanism by:
- Consolidating keywords and functions into a single array
- Adding a reusable
fetchSuggestions
function- Improving type handling for different suggestion kinds
Also applies to: 281-309
524-528
: LGTM! Added history queries handling.The new
handleSetHistoryQuery
function correctly updates both the local state and parent component's history queries while preserving the current position in history.
lib/utils.ts
Outdated
// Remove the # if present | ||
const color = hex.replace('#', ''); | ||
// Convert to RGB | ||
const r = parseInt(color.slice(0, 2), 16); | ||
const g = parseInt(color.slice(2, 4), 16); | ||
const b = parseInt(color.slice(4, 6), 16); | ||
// Mix with white (add 20% of the remaining distance to white) | ||
const lightR = Math.min(255, r + Math.floor((255 - r) * 0.2)); | ||
const lightG = Math.min(255, g + Math.floor((255 - g) * 0.2)); | ||
const lightB = Math.min(255, b + Math.floor((255 - b) * 0.2)); | ||
// Convert back to hex | ||
return `#${lightR.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightG.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightB.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}`; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation for hex color format.
The lightenColor
function assumes a valid 6-digit hex color format but lacks input validation. This could lead to runtime errors with invalid inputs.
Consider this improved implementation:
export const lightenColor = (hex: string): string => {
+ // Validate hex color format
+ const hexRegex = /^#?([A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/;
+ if (!hexRegex.test(hex)) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid hex color format');
+ }
// Remove the # if present
const color = hex.replace('#', '');
+ // Expand 3-digit hex to 6-digit
+ const fullHex = color.length === 3
+ ? color.split('').map(c => c + c).join('')
+ : color;
// Convert to RGB
- const r = parseInt(color.slice(0, 2), 16);
- const g = parseInt(color.slice(2, 4), 16);
- const b = parseInt(color.slice(4, 6), 16);
+ const r = parseInt(fullHex.slice(0, 2), 16);
+ const g = parseInt(fullHex.slice(2, 4), 16);
+ const b = parseInt(fullHex.slice(4, 6), 16);
// Mix with white (add 20% of the remaining distance to white)
const lightR = Math.min(255, r + Math.floor((255 - r) * 0.2));
const lightG = Math.min(255, g + Math.floor((255 - g) * 0.2));
const lightB = Math.min(255, b + Math.floor((255 - b) * 0.2));
// Convert back to hex
return `#${lightR.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightG.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightB.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}`;
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
export const lightenColor = (hex: string): string => { | |
// Remove the # if present | |
const color = hex.replace('#', ''); | |
// Convert to RGB | |
const r = parseInt(color.slice(0, 2), 16); | |
const g = parseInt(color.slice(2, 4), 16); | |
const b = parseInt(color.slice(4, 6), 16); | |
// Mix with white (add 20% of the remaining distance to white) | |
const lightR = Math.min(255, r + Math.floor((255 - r) * 0.2)); | |
const lightG = Math.min(255, g + Math.floor((255 - g) * 0.2)); | |
const lightB = Math.min(255, b + Math.floor((255 - b) * 0.2)); | |
// Convert back to hex | |
return `#${lightR.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightG.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightB.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}`; | |
} | |
export const lightenColor = (hex: string): string => { | |
// Validate hex color format | |
const hexRegex = /^#?([A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/; | |
if (!hexRegex.test(hex)) { | |
throw new Error('Invalid hex color format'); | |
} | |
// Remove the # if present | |
const color = hex.replace('#', ''); | |
// Expand 3-digit hex to 6-digit | |
const fullHex = color.length === 3 | |
? color.split('').map(c => c + c).join('') | |
: color; | |
// Convert to RGB | |
const r = parseInt(fullHex.slice(0, 2), 16); | |
const g = parseInt(fullHex.slice(2, 4), 16); | |
const b = parseInt(fullHex.slice(4, 6), 16); | |
// Mix with white (add 20% of the remaining distance to white) | |
const lightR = Math.min(255, r + Math.floor((255 - r) * 0.2)); | |
const lightG = Math.min(255, g + Math.floor((255 - g) * 0.2)); | |
const lightB = Math.min(255, b + Math.floor((255 - b) * 0.2)); | |
// Convert back to hex | |
return `#${lightR.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightG.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightB.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}`; | |
} |
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ export default function Page() { | |||
if (!result.ok) return | |||
const json = await result.json() | |||
const colors = localStorage.getItem(schemaName)?.split(/[[\]",]/).filter(c => c) | |||
setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, colors)) | |||
setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, false, true, colors)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Document the purpose of boolean parameters in Graph.create.
The Graph.create
method now accepts two additional boolean parameters, but their purpose is not clear from the code. This makes the code harder to maintain and understand.
Consider using named parameters or constants to improve code clarity:
-setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, false, true, colors))
+const GRAPH_OPTIONS = {
+ isDirected: false,
+ isSchema: true
+}
+setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, GRAPH_OPTIONS.isDirected, GRAPH_OPTIONS.isSchema, colors))
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, false, true, colors)) | |
const GRAPH_OPTIONS = { | |
isDirected: false, | |
isSchema: true | |
} | |
setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, GRAPH_OPTIONS.isDirected, GRAPH_OPTIONS.isSchema, colors)) |
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ export default function Page() { | |||
const queryArr = queries.some(q => q.text === query) ? queries : [...queries, { text: query, metadata: result.metadata }] | |||
setQueries(queryArr) | |||
localStorage.setItem("query history", JSON.stringify(queryArr)) | |||
const g = Graph.create(graphName, result, graph.Colors) | |||
const g = Graph.create(graphName, result, false, false, graph.Colors) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the new Graph.create parameters.
The Graph.create
method now accepts two additional boolean parameters, both set to false
. Please ensure that these parameters are documented and their purpose is clear.
Run the following script to check the method signature and documentation:
Also applies to: 103-103
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Graph.create method signature and documentation.
# Search for Graph.create method definition
ast-grep --pattern $'class Graph {
$$$
create($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 78
I'll gather more details on the Graph.create method's signature and its associated documentation. We need to verify that the two new boolean parameters (both set to false) are properly documented in the method's definition.
Please run the following script to locate the file containing the Graph
class and extract the context around the create(
method:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Locate the file containing the Graph class definition
file=$(rg -l "class\s\+Graph" | head -n 1)
if [ -z "$file" ]; then
echo "No file with 'class Graph' found."
exit 1
fi
echo "Found class Graph in: $file"
echo ""
# Display context around the 'create(' method within that file
rg -C 15 "create\s*\(" "$file"
Length of output: 154
I'll run another search to locate the definition or documentation of the Graph.create
method and its updated parameters. Let's try searching for any usage or declaration of Graph.create
across the repository.
Please run the following script:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any file that contains "Graph.create(" along with some context.
rg -n -C 5 "Graph\.create\(" .
Length of output: 4071
I'll run another script to search for the exported definition of the Graph
class, which might lead us to the implementation and documentation for Graph.create
.
Please run this shell script:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the exported definition of Graph class in the repository
rg -l "export\s\+class\s\+Graph" .
Length of output: 36
I'll gather more information about where the Graph class is imported from and its definition to verify the new parameters. Please run the following script to search for Graph imports in the repository, starting with the affected file:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Graph imports in app/graph/page.tsx
rg -n "import .*Graph" app/graph/page.tsx
Length of output: 148
I'll proceed by gathering further details from the file that exports the Graph
class. Since Graph
is imported from ../api/graph/model
in app/graph/page.tsx
, let’s inspect the method signature and documentation for Graph.create
from that file.
Please run the following script:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Display the context around the Graph.create method in app/api/graph/model.ts
rg -n -C 10 "create\s*\(" app/api/graph/model.ts
Length of output: 1137
Action Required: Document the New Parameters in Graph.create
The Graph.create
method in app/api/graph/model.ts now includes two new boolean parameters (isCollapsed
and isSchema
) that are not currently documented. Please add a descriptive comment or JSDoc block for these parameters to clarify their purpose. For example, you might explain:
- isCollapsed: Indicates whether nodes should be rendered in a collapsed state.
- isSchema: Specifies if the graph should be interpreted/constructed as a schema representation.
This documentation will help maintain clarity for other developers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts (1)
24-24
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionReplace fixed timeouts with proper retry mechanism.
Using fixed timeouts with
setTimeout
is unreliable and can lead to flaky tests.The polling implementation should include proper retry handling with timeout and exponential backoff as suggested in the previous review.
Also applies to: 39-39
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts (3)
150-157
: Add error response validation.The test verifies that the user wasn't created but doesn't validate the API's error response. Consider checking the error message/code to ensure proper error handling.
test(`@admin API Test: without passing a username, Attempt to add a user and validate the user was not added`, async () => { const apiCall = new ApiCalls() const username = '' - await apiCall.createUsers({ username, password: user.password, role: user.ReadOnly }); + const response = await apiCall.createUsers({ username, password: user.password, role: user.ReadOnly }); const users = await apiCall.getUsers() const User = users.result.find(u => u.username === username); expect(User).toBeUndefined(); + expect(response.error).toBeDefined(); + expect(response.error.message).toContain('username is required'); });
150-175
: Consider additional edge cases for invalid inputs.The tests currently use empty strings for invalid inputs. Consider testing with
undefined
,null
, and other edge cases.+const invalidInputs = [ + { type: 'undefined', value: undefined }, + { type: 'null', value: null }, + { type: 'empty string', value: '' }, + { type: 'whitespace', value: ' ' } +]; + +invalidInputs.forEach(({ type, value }) => { + test(`@admin API Test: with ${type} username, Attempt to add a user and validate the user was not added`, async () => { + const apiCall = new ApiCalls() + await apiCall.createUsers({ username: value, password: user.password, role: user.ReadOnly }); + const users = await apiCall.getUsers() + const User = users.result.find(u => u.username === value); + expect(User).toBeUndefined(); + }); +});
150-175
: Add retry mechanism for eventual consistency.The tests immediately check for user existence after API calls. Consider adding a retry mechanism to handle potential delays in user list updates.
async function waitForUserExistence(apiCall: ApiCalls, username: string, shouldExist: boolean, maxAttempts = 3): Promise<void> { for (let attempt = 0; attempt < maxAttempts; attempt++) { const users = await apiCall.getUsers(); const user = users.result.find(u => u.username === username); if ((shouldExist && user) || (!shouldExist && !user)) { return; } await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000)); } throw new Error(`User ${shouldExist ? 'not found' : 'still exists'} after ${maxAttempts} attempts`); }Usage example:
test(`@admin API Test: without passing a username, Attempt to add a user and validate the user was not added`, async () => { const apiCall = new ApiCalls() const username = '' await apiCall.createUsers({ username, password: user.password, role: user.ReadOnly }); - const users = await apiCall.getUsers() - const User = users.result.find(u => u.username === username); - expect(User).toBeUndefined(); + await waitForUserExistence(apiCall, username, false); });e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts (2)
152-152
: Useconst
instead oflet
for variables that aren't reassigned.The
value
variable is declared withlet
but never reassigned in multiple test cases.Replace
let
withconst
in these declarations to better indicate the immutability of these values.Also applies to: 161-161, 170-170, 179-179, 188-188, 197-197, 206-206, 228-228
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 152-152: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
215-217
: Simplify nested ternary expression for better readability.The nested ternary expression makes the code harder to read and maintain.
Consider using a more readable approach:
- value = value === '1' ? 'yes' : value === '0' ? 'no' : value; + const valueMap = { + '1': 'yes', + '0': 'no' + }; + value = valueMap[value] || value;🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 216-216: Do not nest ternary expressions.
(no-nested-ternary)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/playwright.yml
(1 hunks)e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts
(1 hunks)e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/playwright.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts
[error] 152-152: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 161-161: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 170-170: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 179-179: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 188-188: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 197-197: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 206-206: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 216-216: Do not nest ternary expressions.
(no-nested-ternary)
[error] 228-228: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts (1)
149-149
: LGTM!The added newline improves code readability by separating test groups.
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.defaultTimeOut, "0") | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
}) | ||
|
||
Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }) => { | ||
Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => { | ||
test(`@admin Modify ${roles.resultSetSize} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => { | ||
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) | ||
const apiCall = new ApiCalls() | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.resultSetSize, input) | ||
await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage() | ||
const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.resultSetSize) | ||
expect(value === input).toBe(expected) | ||
expect(value === input).toBe(expected); | ||
if (index === Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.length - 1) { | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.resultSetSize, "10000") | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
}) | ||
|
||
Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }) => { | ||
Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => { | ||
test(`@admin Modify ${roles.queryMemCapacity} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => { | ||
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) | ||
const apiCall = new ApiCalls() | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.queryMemCapacity, input) | ||
await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage() | ||
const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.queryMemCapacity) | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.queryMemCapacity, "0") // update to default values | ||
expect(value === input).toBe(expected) | ||
const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.queryMemCapacity) | ||
expect(value === input).toBe(expected); | ||
if (index === Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.length - 1) { | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.queryMemCapacity, "0") | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
}) | ||
|
||
Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }) => { | ||
Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => { | ||
test(`@admin Modify ${roles.vKeyMaxEntityCount} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => { | ||
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) | ||
const apiCall = new ApiCalls() | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.vKeyMaxEntityCount, input) | ||
await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage() | ||
const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.vKeyMaxEntityCount) | ||
expect(value === input).toBe(expected) | ||
if (index === Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.length - 1) { | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.vKeyMaxEntityCount, "100000") | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
}) | ||
|
||
Data.CMDData.forEach(({ input, description, expected }) => { | ||
Data.CMDData.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => { | ||
test(`@admin Modify ${roles.cmdInfo} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => { | ||
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) | ||
const apiCall = new ApiCalls() | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.cmdInfo, input) | ||
await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage() | ||
const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.cmdInfo) | ||
expect(value === input).toBe(expected) | ||
if (index === Data.CMDData.length - 1) { | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.cmdInfo, "yes") | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
}) | ||
|
||
Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }) => { | ||
Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => { | ||
test(`@admin Modify ${roles.maxInfoQueries} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => { | ||
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) | ||
const apiCall = new ApiCalls() | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, input) | ||
await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage() | ||
const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries) | ||
expect(value === input).toBe(expected) | ||
}); | ||
}) | ||
|
||
Data.roleModificationData.forEach(({ role, input, description, expected }) => { | ||
test(`@admin Modify ${role} via UI validation via API: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => { | ||
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) | ||
await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(role, input) | ||
const apiCall = new ApiCalls() | ||
let value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(role)).config[1]); | ||
// Convert numeric values to yes/no for boolean settings | ||
if (value === '1') { | ||
value = 'yes'; | ||
} else if (value === '0') { | ||
value = 'no'; | ||
expect(value === input).toBe(expected); | ||
if (index === Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.length - 1) { | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000"); | ||
} | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.queryMemCapacity, "0") // update to default values | ||
expect(value === input).toBe(expected) | ||
}); | ||
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reduce code duplication by extracting common test logic.
The test cases follow a similar pattern and could be refactored into a reusable helper function to improve maintainability.
Consider refactoring the repeated test logic into a helper function:
async function testSettingsRole(
browser: BrowserWrapper,
role: string,
testData: Array<{input: string, description: string, expected: boolean}>,
defaultValue: string
) {
testData.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => {
test(`@admin Modify ${role} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => {
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl);
const apiCall = new ApiCalls();
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(role, input);
await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage();
const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(role);
expect(value === input).toBe(expected);
if (index === testData.length - 1) {
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(role, defaultValue);
}
});
});
}
// Usage:
testSettingsRole(browser, roles.maxQueuedQueries, Data.inputDataRejectsZero, "25");
testSettingsRole(browser, roles.TimeOut, Data.inputDataAcceptsZero, "1000");
// ... etc
test(`@admin Modify maxInfoQueries via UI validation via API: Input value: ${Data.roleModificationData[8].input}`, async () => { | ||
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) | ||
await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input) | ||
await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage(); | ||
await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable(); | ||
await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries); | ||
const apiCall = new ApiCalls() | ||
let value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]); | ||
expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input); | ||
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000"); | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for API calls and UI interactions.
The test assumes all operations will succeed without proper error handling.
Consider adding try-catch blocks and timeout handling:
test(`@admin Modify maxInfoQueries via UI validation via API: Input value: ${Data.roleModificationData[8].input}`, async () => {
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
- await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input)
- await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage();
- await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable();
- await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries);
- const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
- let value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]);
- expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input);
- await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000");
+ try {
+ await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input)
+ await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage();
+ await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable();
+ await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries);
+ const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
+ const value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]);
+ expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input);
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to modify maxInfoQueries: ${error.message}`);
+ } finally {
+ const apiCall = new ApiCalls();
+ await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000");
+ }
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
test(`@admin Modify maxInfoQueries via UI validation via API: Input value: ${Data.roleModificationData[8].input}`, async () => { | |
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) | |
await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input) | |
await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage(); | |
await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable(); | |
await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries); | |
const apiCall = new ApiCalls() | |
let value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]); | |
expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input); | |
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000"); | |
}); | |
test(`@admin Modify maxInfoQueries via UI validation via API: Input value: ${Data.roleModificationData[8].input}`, async () => { | |
const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl) | |
try { | |
await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input) | |
await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage(); | |
await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable(); | |
await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries); | |
const apiCall = new ApiCalls() | |
const value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]); | |
expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input); | |
} catch (error) { | |
throw new Error(`Failed to modify maxInfoQueries: ${error.message}`); | |
} finally { | |
const apiCall = new ApiCalls(); | |
await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000"); | |
} | |
}); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 228-228: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
lib/utils.ts (1)
48-90
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd input validation for hex color format.
The rgbToHSL function assumes a valid hex color format but lacks input validation.
export function rgbToHSL(hex: string): string { + // Validate hex color format + const hexRegex = /^#?([A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/; + if (!hexRegex.test(hex)) { + throw new Error('Invalid hex color format'); + } // Remove the # if present const formattedHex = hex.replace(/^#/, ''); + // Expand 3-digit hex to 6-digit + const fullHex = formattedHex.length === 3 + ? formattedHex.split('').map(c => c + c).join('') + : formattedHex;
🧹 Nitpick comments (18)
app/components/DialogComponent.tsx (1)
40-47
: Great accessibility enhancement!The modified description rendering ensures consistent dialog structure by always including
DialogDescription
, making it more reliable for screen readers while maintaining a clean visual experience.This pattern of maintaining consistent DOM structure with
VisuallyHidden
is a great practice for other similar components in the codebase.app/components/FormComponent.tsx (1)
78-85
: Add accessibility attributes to the tooltip.The tooltip implementation is clean and well-structured. Consider enhancing accessibility with these improvements:
<Tooltip> <TooltipTrigger asChild> - <InfoIcon size={20} /> + <InfoIcon + size={20} + aria-label={`More information about ${field.label}`} + /> </TooltipTrigger> - <TooltipContent> + <TooltipContent + id={`${field.label.toLowerCase()}-tooltip`} + role="tooltip" + > {field.info} </TooltipContent> </Tooltip>app/graph/Tutorial.tsx (3)
36-36
: Consider adding a title or removing empty DrawerTitle.The empty
DrawerTitle
component doesn't serve any purpose. Consider either adding a meaningful title for accessibility or removing the component if not needed.-<DrawerTitle /> +<DrawerTitle>Tutorial</DrawerTitle>
45-45
: Maintain consistent padding across carousel items.The padding (p-32) is inconsistent with other carousel items that use p-40. Consider maintaining consistent padding for visual harmony.
-<CarouselItem className="border text-center p-32"> +<CarouselItem className="border text-center p-40">
46-48
: Improve text formatting for better readability.The multi-line text formatting could be improved for better readability and maintainability.
- <p>Interact with your data with a force-directed layout, - with features including zoom, pan, - node-drag and interactive node/link hover and click events</p> + <p> + Interact with your data using a force-directed layout with features like zoom, + pan, node-drag, and interactive node/link events + </p>app/page.tsx (2)
9-13
: Consider improving the Image component configuration.While the layout structure is good, the Image component could be improved:
- <Image style={{ width: 'auto', height: '100px' }} priority src="/BrowserLogo.svg" alt="FalkorDB Logo" width={0} height={0} /> + <Image + className="h-[100px] w-auto" + priority + src="/BrowserLogo.svg" + alt="FalkorDB Logo" + width={400} + height={100} + />This change:
- Moves styling to className for better consistency
- Sets proper width/height props for better image optimization
- Improves code readability with proper formatting
15-15
: Simplify the version string template.The version string template has unnecessary braces.
- <p>Version: {`{${pkg.version}}`}</p> + <p>Version: {pkg.version}</p>e2e/logic/POM/settingsUsersPage.ts (2)
23-25
: Consider using more descriptive locators
Using a direct XPath to locate this edit button may become fragile if the DOM structure changes. Consider usingdata-testid
or semantic attributes for a more stable and readable locator.
104-106
: Ensure element readiness before interaction
Hovering the row and clicking two different buttons in quick succession could fail if the UI introduces a delay. Consider verifying visibility or waiting for the button to be enabled before clicking to avoid flaky tests.app/components/TableComponent.tsx (1)
15-15
: LGTM! Consider using a discriminated union for Cell type.The new imports and type updates look good. The Promise return type for onChange is a good choice for async operations.
Consider using a discriminated union for the Cell type to make it more type-safe:
-type Cell = { - value: DataCell, - onChange?: (value: string) => Promise<boolean>, - type?: string - comboboxType?: string -} +type BaseCell = { + value: DataCell, + onChange?: (value: string) => Promise<boolean>, +} + +type InputCell = BaseCell & { + type: undefined +} + +type ComboboxCell = BaseCell & { + type: "combobox" + comboboxType: string +} + +type Cell = InputCell | ComboboxCellAlso applies to: 19-19, 23-25
app/settings/users/Users.tsx (1)
29-44
: Consider adding error handling for role updates.The role update logic is well-implemented with undo functionality. However, consider adding specific error handling for different failure scenarios.
Add error handling:
const handleSetRole = async (username: string, role: string, oldRole?: string) => { const result = await securedFetch(`api/user/${prepareArg(username)}?userRole=${role}`, { method: 'PATCH' }, session?.user?.role, toast) if (result.ok) { setUsers(prev => prev.map(user => user.username === username ? { ...user, role } : user)) setRows(prev => prev.map(row => row.cells[0].value === username ? { ...row, cells: [row.cells[0], { ...row.cells[1], value: role }] } : row)) toast({ title: "Success", description: `${username} role updated successfully`, action: oldRole ? <ToastAction altText="Undo" onClick={() => handleSetRole(username, oldRole)}>Undo</ToastAction> : undefined }) + } else { + const errorData = await result.json().catch(() => ({ error: 'Unknown error occurred' })) + toast({ + title: "Error", + description: errorData.error || `Failed to update role for ${username}`, + variant: "destructive" + }) } }app/settings/page.tsx (1)
38-38
: Enhance button accessibility with ARIA attributes.The button styling logic improvement is good. Consider adding ARIA attributes to enhance accessibility.
Add ARIA attributes by applying this diff:
<Button - className={cn("p-2 rounded-lg", current === "DB" ? "bg-background" : "text-gray-500")} + className={cn("p-2 rounded-lg", current === "DB" ? "bg-background" : "text-gray-500")} + aria-pressed={current === "DB"} + aria-label="Database Configuration Tab" label="DB Configuration" onClick={() => setCurrent("DB")} /> <Button - className={cn("p-2 rounded-lg", current === "Users" ? "bg-background" : "text-gray-500")} + className={cn("p-2 rounded-lg", current === "Users" ? "bg-background" : "text-gray-500")} + aria-pressed={current === "Users"} + aria-label="Users Tab" label="Users" onClick={() => setCurrent("Users")} />Also applies to: 43-43
app/components/graph/DeleteGraph.tsx (1)
4-4
: Add error handling for missing session data and enhance delete confirmation.The integration of session management is good. However, consider adding error handling and enhancing the delete confirmation UX.
Add error handling and enhance delete confirmation by applying this diff:
const deleteGraph = async () => { + if (!session?.user?.role) { + toast({ + title: "Error", + description: "Session data is missing", + variant: "destructive", + }); + return; + } + const name = `${graphName}${isSchema ? "_schema" : ""}` + // Add confirmation text validation + const confirmText = await new Promise<string>((resolve) => { + const text = window.prompt(`Type "${name}" to confirm deletion:`); + resolve(text || ""); + }); + + if (confirmText !== name) { + toast({ + title: "Cancelled", + description: "Graph deletion was cancelled", + }); + return; + } + const result = await securedFetch(`/api/graph/${prepareArg(name)}`, { method: "DELETE", - }, session?.user?.role, toast); + }, session.user.role, toast);Also applies to: 16-16, 22-22
app/graph/Duplicate.tsx (1)
25-29
: Consider adding error message handling.While the error handling is good, consider extracting the error message from the response for more specific feedback to users.
- if (!result.ok) return + if (!result.ok) { + const errorMessage = await result.text() + toast({ + title: "Error duplicating graph", + description: errorMessage || "Failed to duplicate graph", + variant: "destructive" + }) + return + }app/components/ExportGraph.tsx (1)
21-48
: Consider using Promise.all for parallel exports.The current implementation processes exports sequentially. For better performance with multiple selections, consider using Promise.all.
const handleExport = () => { - selectedValues.map(async value => { + Promise.all(selectedValues.map(async value => { const name = `${value}${!type ? "_schema" : ""}` const result = await securedFetch(`api/graph/${prepareArg(name)}/export`, { method: "GET" }, session?.user?.role, toast) if (!result.ok) return const blob = await result.blob() const url = window.URL.createObjectURL(blob) try { const link = document.createElement('a') link.href = url link.setAttribute('download', `${name}.dump`) document.body.appendChild(link) link.click() link.parentNode?.removeChild(link) window.URL.revokeObjectURL(url) } catch (e) { toast({ title: "Error", description: "Error while exporting data", variant: "destructive" }) } - }) + }))app/globals.css (2)
34-34
: Consider removing !important and using CSS custom properties for font-family.The font-family updates look good, but consider:
- Removing the
!important
declaration and using proper CSS specificity.- Moving the font-family declaration to the
:root
selector for better maintainability.@layer base { :root { /* ... other custom properties ... */ + --font-family: 'FiraCode', 'Arial', monospace; } + + body { + font-family: var(--font-family); + } } -* { - font-family: 'FiraCode', 'Arial', monospace !important; -}Also applies to: 71-71
52-54
: Consider using CSS custom properties for gradient colors.The gradient implementation looks good, but consider using CSS custom properties for the colors to maintain consistency and enable easier theme customization.
@layer base { :root { /* ... other custom properties ... */ + --gradient-start: #EC806C; + --gradient-middle: #B66EBD; + --gradient-end: #7568F2; } } .Gradient { - background: linear-gradient(90deg, #EC806C 0%, #B66EBD 43.41%, #7568F2 100%); + background: linear-gradient(90deg, + var(--gradient-start) 0%, + var(--gradient-middle) 43.41%, + var(--gradient-end) 100% + ); }app/graph/toolbar.tsx (1)
58-82
: Consider moving ESLint disable comment to component level.The implementation looks good, but the ESLint disable comment for
jsx-a11y/anchor-is-valid
could be moved to the component level with other ESLint configurations for better maintainability.'use client' /* eslint-disable react/require-default-props */ +/* eslint-disable jsx-a11y/anchor-is-valid */ import { Link, PlusCircle, Shrink, Trash2, ZoomIn, ZoomOut } from "lucide-react";
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
public/fonts/obviously_narrow.woff
is excluded by!**/*.woff
public/fonts/obviously_narrow.woff2
is excluded by!**/*.woff2
public/fonts/oswald.ttf
is excluded by!**/*.ttf
📒 Files selected for processing (43)
app/api/graph/model.ts
(14 hunks)app/api/user/[user]/route.ts
(1 hunks)app/api/user/route.ts
(0 hunks)app/components/CreateGraph.tsx
(5 hunks)app/components/DialogComponent.tsx
(2 hunks)app/components/EditorComponent.tsx
(14 hunks)app/components/ExportGraph.tsx
(2 hunks)app/components/ForceGraph.tsx
(6 hunks)app/components/FormComponent.tsx
(2 hunks)app/components/Header.tsx
(3 hunks)app/components/TableComponent.tsx
(4 hunks)app/components/graph/DeleteGraph.tsx
(2 hunks)app/components/ui/Button.tsx
(2 hunks)app/components/ui/combobox.tsx
(9 hunks)app/create/page.tsx
(0 hunks)app/globals.css
(3 hunks)app/graph/Duplicate.tsx
(2 hunks)app/graph/GraphDataPanel.tsx
(11 hunks)app/graph/GraphView.tsx
(6 hunks)app/graph/Selector.tsx
(7 hunks)app/graph/Tutorial.tsx
(2 hunks)app/graph/View.tsx
(5 hunks)app/graph/labels.tsx
(1 hunks)app/graph/page.tsx
(5 hunks)app/graph/toolbar.tsx
(3 hunks)app/layout.tsx
(2 hunks)app/login/LoginForm.tsx
(2 hunks)app/monitor/page.tsx
(1 hunks)app/page.tsx
(1 hunks)app/schema/SchemaCreateElement.tsx
(2 hunks)app/schema/SchemaDataPanel.tsx
(1 hunks)app/schema/SchemaView.tsx
(10 hunks)app/schema/page.tsx
(3 hunks)app/settings/Configurations.tsx
(4 hunks)app/settings/page.tsx
(1 hunks)app/settings/users/AddUser.tsx
(2 hunks)app/settings/users/DeleteUser.tsx
(2 hunks)app/settings/users/Users.tsx
(4 hunks)e2e/logic/POM/navBarComponent.ts
(1 hunks)e2e/logic/POM/settingsConfigPage.ts
(3 hunks)e2e/logic/POM/settingsUsersPage.ts
(2 hunks)e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts
(3 hunks)lib/utils.ts
(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- app/create/page.tsx
- app/api/user/route.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (16)
- app/graph/labels.tsx
- app/login/LoginForm.tsx
- app/schema/SchemaCreateElement.tsx
- app/schema/SchemaDataPanel.tsx
- app/settings/Configurations.tsx
- app/components/CreateGraph.tsx
- app/graph/Selector.tsx
- app/components/Header.tsx
- app/components/ui/combobox.tsx
- app/schema/SchemaView.tsx
- app/layout.tsx
- app/graph/View.tsx
- e2e/logic/POM/settingsConfigPage.ts
- app/graph/GraphView.tsx
- e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts
- app/api/graph/model.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (39)
app/components/DialogComponent.tsx (1)
6-6
: LGTM! Good accessibility improvement.The addition of
VisuallyHidden
from Radix UI is a good choice for improving accessibility.app/components/FormComponent.tsx (1)
7-7
: LGTM! Import changes are well-organized.The new imports for tooltip components and icons are properly structured and align with the component's enhanced functionality.
Also applies to: 9-9
app/page.tsx (2)
4-5
: LGTM! Imports are appropriate for the new functionality.The new imports support the added features - Image for logo display and pkg for version information.
18-18
: Verify the Gradient class styling.Ensure that the
Gradient
class is properly defined in your CSS files.✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the Gradient class definition rg -t css "\.Gradient"Length of output: 56
Gradient styling verified in app/globals.css
TheGradient
class is defined as expected inapp/globals.css
. No further changes are needed.e2e/logic/POM/settingsUsersPage.ts (2)
27-29
: Looks good
This locator approach is concise and consistent with the rest of the codebase. No issues found here.
31-32
: Consistent approach for role button locator
This is similarly structured and works well. No immediate concerns.app/components/TableComponent.tsx (2)
37-39
: LGTM! Props interface and component signature are well-defined.The Props interface and component signature are properly updated to include the optional options array.
Also applies to: 41-41
213-220
: LGTM! Tooltip implementation improves user experience.The tooltip addition is a good UX improvement, showing the full cell value on hover.
app/settings/users/DeleteUser.tsx (4)
8-9
: LGTM!The new imports and interface updates are correctly implemented to support session management and row state synchronization.
Also applies to: 14-14
17-18
: LGTM!The function signature and session hook are properly implemented for role-based access control.
30-30
: LGTM!The session role is correctly passed to securedFetch for role-based access control.
38-38
: LGTM!The row state update correctly synchronizes with user deletion, maintaining consistency between users and rows.
app/settings/users/Users.tsx (5)
11-11
: LGTM!Session management is properly set up for role-based access control.
Also applies to: 27-27
53-53
: LGTM!The user fetch logic is properly updated with role-based access control, and the row mapping is more maintainable.
Also applies to: 58-64
80-80
: LGTM!The user addition logic correctly integrates role-based access control and maintains state consistency.
Also applies to: 88-98
108-108
: LGTM!The role options are correctly passed to the table component.
112-112
: LGTM!The DeleteUser component integration is properly updated with row state management.
app/graph/Duplicate.tsx (2)
4-4
: LGTM! Good addition of session management.The integration of
useSession
hook enhances security by enabling role-based access control.Also applies to: 19-19
32-36
: LGTM! Good user feedback.The success toast provides clear feedback to users about the operation's outcome.
lib/utils.ts (2)
14-24
: LGTM! Good enhancement of securedFetch with role-based access.The addition of the role parameter and its integration into the URL improves security by enabling role-based access control.
27-38
: LGTM! Improved error handling.Good improvement in error handling by using
response.text()
for error messages and handling authentication failures appropriately.app/components/ExportGraph.tsx (1)
1-13
: LGTM! Good component flexibility.The addition of the trigger prop enhances component reusability.
app/components/ui/Button.tsx (1)
46-77
: LGTM! Good accessibility and UX improvements.The addition of tooltips and aria-labels enhances both accessibility and user experience. The conditional rendering is well implemented.
app/schema/page.tsx (2)
26-28
: LGTM! Role-based access control is properly implemented.The
securedFetch
calls now correctly include the user's role from the session, enhancing security through proper role-based access control.Also applies to: 30-32, 43-45
49-49
: Document the purpose of boolean parameters in Graph.create.The
Graph.create
method now accepts two additional boolean parameters (false
andtrue
), but their purpose is not clear from the code.app/settings/users/AddUser.tsx (1)
10-10
: LGTM! UI structure is properly updated.The component structure is updated to use
SheetDescription
instead ofSheetHeader
, maintaining proper UI hierarchy.Also applies to: 138-138
app/graph/page.tsx (3)
35-37
: LGTM! Role-based access control is properly implemented.The
securedFetch
calls now correctly include the user's role from the session, enhancing security through proper role-based access control.Also applies to: 39-41, 71-73
90-90
: Document the purpose of boolean parameters in Graph.create.The
Graph.create
method now accepts two additional boolean parameters (both set tofalse
), but their purpose is not clear from the code.Also applies to: 103-103
132-132
: LGTM! History queries are properly handled.The
setHistoryQueries
function correctly preserves metadata while updating the query text, ensuring that no data is lost during updates.app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (3)
57-75
: LGTM! Resize handling is improved with ResizeObserver.The resize handling is now more robust using
ResizeObserver
with proper cleanup in the cleanup function. This is a better approach than relying solely on window resize events.
124-140
: LGTM! Click handling prevents rapid double-clicks.The click handling now includes debouncing to prevent rapid double-clicks on the same node, improving user experience.
305-308
: LGTM! Link visuals are enhanced.The graph links now have proper directional arrows and colors, improving the visual representation of relationships between nodes.
app/graph/GraphDataPanel.tsx (1)
12-12
: LGTM! Improved session management.The changes improve the component by:
- Removing prop drilling by using the
useSession
hook directly.- Maintaining consistent session access pattern across the application.
Also applies to: 29-29, 41-41, 70-70, 241-241, 361-361
app/components/EditorComponent.tsx (4)
73-73
: Fixed keyword typo.Corrected the misspelled keyword from "MARGE" to "MERGE".
179-195
: Improved suggestion handling.The new
SUGGESTIONS
array combines keywords and functions into a single structure, making the suggestion mechanism more maintainable and efficient.
234-251
: Enhanced resize handling.Added a
ResizeObserver
to properly handle editor resizing when the container size changes.
525-529
: Improved history management.Added
handleSetHistoryQuery
to properly manage and sync history queries across the application.app/graph/toolbar.tsx (2)
29-30
: LGTM!Props destructuring correctly aligns with the interface changes.
93-93
: LGTM!The disabled state logic correctly combines both
deleteDisabled
and globaldisabled
props.
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ export default class NavBarComponent extends BasePage { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
private get graphsButton(): Locator { | |||
return this.page.getByRole("button", { name: "Graphs" }); | |||
return this.page.locator("//button[contains(text(), 'Graphs')]"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Revert to using getByRole
for better maintainability and accessibility.
The XPath locator makes the test more brittle and deviates from Playwright's best practices. Consider these alternatives in order of preference:
- Revert to the original locator (preferred):
- return this.page.locator("//button[contains(text(), 'Graphs')]");
+ return this.page.getByRole("button", { name: "Graphs" });
-
If the button is not properly labeled, fix the accessibility attributes in the component instead of using XPath.
-
If
getByRole
doesn't work, try other built-in locators before using XPath:
return this.page.getByText("Graphs", { exact: true });
// or
return this.page.getByTestId("graphs-button");
This maintains consistency with other button locators in the file and follows Playwright's best practices.
cell.type === "combobox" ? | ||
<Combobox | ||
options={options!} | ||
setSelectedValue={(value) => { | ||
cell.onChange!(value) | ||
handleSetEditable("", "") | ||
}} | ||
type={cell.comboboxType} | ||
/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add proper error handling and null checks in combobox implementation.
The current implementation has several issues:
- Non-null assertions (!.) should be avoided
- Missing error handling for onChange
Apply this diff to improve type safety and error handling:
cell.type === "combobox" ?
<Combobox
- options={options!}
- setSelectedValue={(value) => {
- cell.onChange!(value)
- handleSetEditable("", "")
+ options={options ?? []}
+ setSelectedValue={async (value) => {
+ if (!cell.onChange) return;
+ try {
+ const success = await cell.onChange(value);
+ if (success) {
+ handleSetEditable("", "")
+ }
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to update value:', error);
+ }
}}
type={cell.comboboxType}
/>
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
cell.type === "combobox" ? | |
<Combobox | |
options={options!} | |
setSelectedValue={(value) => { | |
cell.onChange!(value) | |
handleSetEditable("", "") | |
}} | |
type={cell.comboboxType} | |
/> | |
cell.type === "combobox" ? | |
<Combobox | |
options={options ?? []} | |
setSelectedValue={async (value) => { | |
if (!cell.onChange) return; | |
try { | |
const success = await cell.onChange(value); | |
if (success) { | |
handleSetEditable("", "") | |
} | |
} catch (error) { | |
console.error('Failed to update value:', error); | |
} | |
}} | |
type={cell.comboboxType} | |
/> |
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ export async function PATCH(req: NextRequest, { params }: { params: Promise<{ us | |||
} | |||
|
|||
const { user: username } = await params | |||
const role = ROLE.get(req.nextUrl.searchParams.get("role") || "") | |||
const role = ROLE.get(req.nextUrl.searchParams.get("userRole") || "") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify the impact of renaming the query parameter.
The change from "role" to "userRole" is valid. However, ensure that all client-side code has been updated to use the new parameter name.
Run the following script to verify the parameter usage:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining usage of the old parameter name.
# Test: Search for "role" parameter in API calls. Expect: Only occurrences of "userRole".
rg -A 5 $'searchParams\.get\("role"\)'
Length of output: 495
Inconsistent Query Parameter Name Detected
The renaming to "userRole"
was correctly applied in app/api/user/[user]/route.ts
, but the search reveals that app/api/graph/[graph]/route.ts
still uses the old parameter "role"
. Please review whether this endpoint should also be updated to "userRole"
to maintain consistency with client-side expectations.
@@ -4,19 +4,21 @@ import useSWR from 'swr' | |||
import React, { useState } from 'react' | |||
import { securedFetch } from '@/lib/utils' | |||
import { useToast } from '@/components/ui/use-toast' | |||
import { useSession } from 'next-auth/react' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for missing session data.
The integration of session management is good. However, consider handling cases where the session or user role might be undefined.
Add error handling by applying this diff:
- const fetcher = (url: string) => securedFetch(url, {
+ const fetcher = async (url: string) => {
+ if (!session?.user?.role) {
+ toast({
+ title: "Error",
+ description: "Session data is missing",
+ variant: "destructive",
+ });
+ return [];
+ }
+ return securedFetch(url, {
method: 'GET',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
- }, session?.user?.role, toast).then((result) => {
+ }, session.user.role, toast).then((result) => {
if (result.ok) {
setTime(new Date())
return result.json()
}
return []
- })
+ })}
Also applies to: 14-14, 21-21
selectedElementsLength: number, | ||
displayAdd: boolean |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Breaking change: selectedElementsLength
is now required.
The removal of the optional modifier (?
) from selectedElementsLength
makes it a required prop, which could break existing implementations. Consider keeping it optional for backward compatibility.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing usages of the Toolbar component
ast-grep --pattern 'Toolbar $props'
Length of output: 37
Let's gather additional information on how the updated properties are being used throughout the codebase. We need to see if there are existing usages of the <Toolbar />
component that may be affected by the breaking change (i.e., making selectedElementsLength
required and adding the new mandatory prop displayAdd
).
I'm generating a new shell script to search for:
- Usages of the
<Toolbar />
component, - Occurrences of
selectedElementsLength
in prop initializations or usage, - Occurrences of
displayAdd
.
This should help us verify the impact of these changes.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Toolbar component usages throughout the repository
rg -n "<Toolbar" || true
# Search for occurrences of 'selectedElementsLength:' in the codebase to check how it is being passed or defined
rg -n "selectedElementsLength:" || true
# Search for occurrences of 'displayAdd:' to see if it is being used elsewhere and how it's passed
rg -n "displayAdd:" || true
Length of output: 308
Let's gather more context about how <Toolbar />
is being used in the repository to verify if the new required properties (selectedElementsLength
and displayAdd
) are being provided. This will help us determine the potential impact of this breaking change.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
echo "Checking <Toolbar /> usage in SchemaView.tsx:"
rg -n -C5 "<Toolbar" app/schema/SchemaView.tsx || true
echo "Checking <Toolbar /> usage in GraphView.tsx:"
rg -n -C5 "<Toolbar" app/graph/GraphView.tsx || true
Length of output: 1791
Breaking Change: <Toolbar />
Usage Missing Required displayAdd
Prop
The recent changes in app/graph/toolbar.tsx
update the Props interface by making selectedElementsLength
required and introducing a new required property displayAdd
. However, both <Toolbar />
usages in app/schema/SchemaView.tsx
and app/graph/GraphView.tsx
are not providing the new displayAdd
prop. This discrepancy will likely cause type errors or runtime issues. Please update these component instances to pass a valid boolean value for displayAdd
.
PR Type
Enhancement, Bug fix
Description
Introduced schema-specific handling in graph creation and extension methods.
Fixed keyword typo and optimized suggestion handling in
EditorComponent
.Improved resize handling in
ForceGraph
withResizeObserver
.Updated UI elements and logic for schema and graph views.
Changes walkthrough 📝
10 files
Add schema-specific logic to graph creation and extension
Improve resize handling using ResizeObserver
Update ForceGraph and maximize button logic
Add schema-specific graph creation logic
Update preferences handling with schema-specific logic
Update graph creation with schema-specific parameters
Update attribute count display in schema creation
Update attribute count display in schema data panel
Enhance schema view with formatted attributes and role checks
Update schema creation logic with schema-specific parameters
1 files
Fix keyword typo and optimize suggestion handling
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
UI & Accessibility Improvements
Validation & Stability