Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Staging #614

Open
wants to merge 99 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Staging #614

wants to merge 99 commits into from

Conversation

Anchel123
Copy link
Contributor

@Anchel123 Anchel123 commented Jan 16, 2025

PR Type

Enhancement, Bug fix


Description

  • Introduced schema-specific handling in graph creation and extension methods.

  • Fixed keyword typo and optimized suggestion handling in EditorComponent.

  • Improved resize handling in ForceGraph with ResizeObserver.

  • Updated UI elements and logic for schema and graph views.


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
10 files
model.ts
Add schema-specific logic to graph creation and extension
+36/-13 
ForceGraph.tsx
Improve resize handling using ResizeObserver                         
+20/-6   
GraphView.tsx
Update ForceGraph and maximize button logic                           
+2/-6     
Selector.tsx
Add schema-specific graph creation logic                                 
+1/-1     
View.tsx
Update preferences handling with schema-specific logic     
+7/-5     
page.tsx
Update graph creation with schema-specific parameters       
+2/-2     
SchemaCreateElement.tsx
Update attribute count display in schema creation               
+2/-2     
SchemaDataPanel.tsx
Update attribute count display in schema data panel           
+1/-1     
SchemaView.tsx
Enhance schema view with formatted attributes and role checks
+14/-6   
page.tsx
Update schema creation logic with schema-specific parameters
+1/-1     
Bug fix
1 files
EditorComponent.tsx
Fix keyword typo and optimize suggestion handling               
+6/-9     

Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any question about Qodo Merge usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • Summary by CodeRabbit

    • New Features

      • Enhanced query editor with improved suggestion and history management.
      • Updated header and home page layout showcasing new branding elements and version information.
      • Added tooltip features across various components for improved user feedback.
    • UI & Accessibility Improvements

      • Optimized graph display with dynamic color adjustments and responsive resizing.
      • Refined styling of schema elements and login interfaces for a more cohesive look.
      • Improved accessibility by ensuring consistent rendering of descriptions in dialogs and tooltips.
    • Validation & Stability

      • Strengthened input validation to reject whitespace-only graph names and enforce configuration limits.
      • Enhanced error handling for user role modifications and configuration updates.

    @Anchel123 Anchel123 requested a review from AviAvni January 16, 2025 13:20
    Copy link

    vercel bot commented Jan 16, 2025

    The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

    Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
    falkordb-browser ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2025 2:22pm

    Copy link
    Contributor

    coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

    Walkthrough

    This pull request updates multiple aspects of the codebase. The workflows and Docker configurations now use Node.js version 22. In the graph and schema modules, new functions and revised method signatures add boolean parameters to enhance schema processing. Several UI components are improved with typo fixes, state management adjustments, event handling, and layout refinements. CSS classes and layouts were updated for visual consistency. Additionally, end-to-end tests and Playwright configurations were enhanced, and a new utility function for converting hex colors to HSL format was introduced.

    Changes

    File(s) / Group Change Summary
    .github/workflows/nextjs.yml, .github/workflows/playwright.yml, Dockerfile Updated Node.js versions (from 18 to 22), changed docker image tags, and added steps for directory creation and screenshot uploading.
    app/api/graph/model.ts, app/graph/page.tsx, app/graph/GraphView.tsx, app/graph/Selector.tsx, app/graph/View.tsx, app/schema/SchemaView.tsx, app/schema/page.tsx Revised graph and schema APIs with a new getSchemaValue function and updated method signatures (Graph.create, extend, extendNode, extendEdge) adding boolean parameters for enhanced schema handling.
    app/components/EditorComponent.tsx, app/components/ForceGraph.tsx, app/components/Header.tsx, app/page.tsx, app/login/LoginForm.tsx, app/components/CreateGraph.tsx, app/components/ui/Dropzone.tsx, app/components/ui/combobox.tsx, app/graph/GraphDataPanel.tsx, app/graph/labels.tsx, app/settings/Configurations.tsx UI improvements including typo corrections, state and event handling enhancements, layout restructuring, prop removals/replacements, and conditional styling/validation updates.
    app/schema/SchemaCreateElement.tsx, app/schema/SchemaDataPanel.tsx, app/schema/SchemaView.tsx Schema UI enhancements: updated attribute count styling, added tabindex for accessibility, and refined query string formatting.
    app/globals.css, app/layout.tsx Style and layout updates by removing/renaming CSS classes and modifying background gradients and body class names for consistency.
    e2e/config/settingsConfigData.json, e2e/logic/POM/settingsConfigPage.ts, e2e/tests/auth.setup.ts, e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts, playwright.config.ts, e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts Test and configuration updates: adjusted role inputs, enhanced element interactions with new getters/methods, added fullscreen mode in tests, improved test loops with API calls, and updated Playwright reporter and artifact settings.
    lib/utils.ts Added a new function rgbToHSL to convert hexadecimal color strings to HSL format.

    Sequence Diagram(s)

    sequenceDiagram
        participant User
        participant EditorComponent
        participant SuggestionAPI
        participant SuggestionProvider
        User->>EditorComponent: Enter query/input
        EditorComponent->>SuggestionAPI: Call fetchSuggestions(query)
        SuggestionAPI-->>EditorComponent: Return suggestions
        EditorComponent->>SuggestionProvider: Update suggestions
        SuggestionProvider-->>EditorComponent: Render suggestions
    
    Loading
    sequenceDiagram
        participant UI
        participant GraphView
        participant GraphModel
        participant ExtendFunctions
        UI->>GraphView: Request graph creation
        GraphView->>GraphModel: Call Graph.create(name, result, collapsed, isSchema, colors)
        GraphModel->>ExtendFunctions: Call extend, extendNode, extendEdge (with isSchema)
        ExtendFunctions-->>GraphModel: Return extended nodes/edges
        GraphModel-->>GraphView: Return configured graph instance
    
    Loading

    Possibly related PRs

    • Fix #608 fix editor #609: Involves modifications to the KEYWORDS array and getSuggestions function within the EditorComponent, similar to some changes here.

    Suggested reviewers

    • AviAvni
    • gkorland

    Poem

    I'm a rabbit hopping through lines of code,
    With Node 22 now lightening my load.
    Graphs extend with booleans in play,
    UI and tests pave a smoother way.
    Carrots and commits brighten my day—
    Hopping on changes in a joyful display!
    🐇🥕 Code leaps into a brighter day!

    Tip

    🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
    • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
    • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
    • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.
    ✨ Finishing Touches
    • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 1

    🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
    app/api/graph/model.ts (1)

    8-29: Consider returning boolean values for unique and required

    The function getSchemaValue assigns string values "true" and "false" to unique and required. For better type safety and clarity, consider using boolean values true and false instead.

    Apply this diff to adjust the function:

     const getSchemaValue = (value: string): [string, string, boolean, boolean] => {
    -    let unique, required, type, description
    +    let unique: boolean, required: boolean, type: string, description: string
         if (value.includes("!")) {
             value = value.replace("!", "")
    -        unique = "true"
    +        unique = true
         } else {
    -        unique = "false"
    +        unique = false
         }
         if (value.includes("*")) {
             value = value.replace("*", "")
    -        required = "true"
    +        required = true
         } else {
    -        required = "false"
    +        required = false
         }
         if (value.includes("-")) {
             [type, description] = value.split("-")
         } else {
             type = "string"
             description = ""
         }
         return [type, description, unique, required]
     }
    app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (1)

    61-80: Improved resize handling with ResizeObserver.

    The new implementation offers several advantages:

    1. Uses modern ResizeObserver API for efficient size tracking
    2. Includes window resize listener as a fallback
    3. Properly cleans up listeners in the cleanup function

    Consider adding a fallback for browsers that don't support ResizeObserver:

     useEffect(() => {
         const handleResize = () => {
             if (!parentRef.current) return
             setParentWidth(parentRef.current.clientWidth)
             setParentHeight(parentRef.current.clientHeight)
         }
    
         handleResize()
    
    -    const resizeObserver = new ResizeObserver(handleResize)
    -    if (parentRef.current) {
    -        resizeObserver.observe(parentRef.current)
    -    }
    +    let resizeObserver: ResizeObserver | undefined;
    +    if (typeof ResizeObserver !== 'undefined') {
    +        resizeObserver = new ResizeObserver(handleResize)
    +        if (parentRef.current) {
    +            resizeObserver.observe(parentRef.current)
    +        }
    +    }
    
         window.addEventListener('resize', handleResize)
    
         return () => {
    -        resizeObserver.disconnect()
    +        resizeObserver?.disconnect()
             window.removeEventListener('resize', handleResize)
         }
     }, [])
    📜 Review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL
    Plan: Pro

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f8d1e06 and d192e0f.

    📒 Files selected for processing (11)
    • app/api/graph/model.ts (8 hunks)
    • app/components/EditorComponent.tsx (4 hunks)
    • app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/graph/GraphView.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/graph/Selector.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/graph/View.tsx (3 hunks)
    • app/graph/page.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/schema/SchemaCreateElement.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/schema/SchemaDataPanel.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/schema/SchemaView.tsx (3 hunks)
    • app/schema/page.tsx (1 hunks)
    ✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
    • app/schema/SchemaCreateElement.tsx
    • app/graph/GraphView.tsx
    ⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
    • GitHub Check: test
    • GitHub Check: test
    🔇 Additional comments (14)
    app/schema/page.tsx (1)

    49-49: Verify that json.result has the expected structure

    Ensure that json.result conforms to the expected structure { data: Data, metadata: any[] } when passing it to Graph.create. This will prevent potential runtime errors due to mismatched data formats.

    app/graph/page.tsx (1)

    90-90: Ensure result passed to Graph.create has the correct structure

    Verify that result conforms to the expected structure { data: Data, metadata: any[] } when calling Graph.create. Inconsistent data formats can lead to runtime errors or unexpected behavior.

    Also applies to: 103-103

    app/graph/View.tsx (3)

    45-45: LGTM! UI improvements for better content handling.

    The addition of overflow-hidden and padding classes improves the visual presentation and content containment.

    Also applies to: 47-47


    159-159: Improved button disable logic.

    The new condition using every method provides a more accurate way to check color presence.


    22-24: Verify the impact of new Graph.create parameters.

    The addition of false, true parameters to Graph.create needs verification to ensure it doesn't affect existing graph behavior.

    Run this script to check other usages of Graph.create:

    ✅ Verification successful

    Graph.create parameters are consistent with codebase patterns

    The false, true parameters in Graph.create align with the established pattern where schema-related components use these exact parameters, while graph-related components use false, false. The change appears to be intentional to align the behavior with other schema views.

    🏁 Scripts executed

    The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

    Script:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Search for Graph.create calls to verify parameter consistency
    ast-grep --pattern 'Graph.create($_, $_, $_, $_)'
    

    Length of output: 149


    Script:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Search for Graph.create with different parameter counts and implementation
    echo "=== Graph.create with 3 params ==="
    ast-grep --pattern 'Graph.create($_, $_, $_)'
    
    echo -e "\n=== Graph.create with 5 params ==="
    ast-grep --pattern 'Graph.create($_, $_, $_, $_, $_)'
    
    echo -e "\n=== Graph.create implementation ==="
    ast-grep --pattern 'create($$$) {
      $$$
    }'
    
    # Fallback to ripgrep for any other potential usages
    echo -e "\n=== Other Graph.create references ==="
    rg "Graph.create" -A 2
    

    Length of output: 2159

    app/schema/SchemaView.tsx (4)

    31-38: Enhanced attribute formatting with special markers.

    The new formatting logic improves attribute representation by:

    • Adding ! for required fields (u === "true")
    • Adding * for repeatable fields (r === "true")
    • Adding -${d} for default values

    41-41: LGTM! Updated query construction with formatted attributes.

    The queries now correctly use the formatted attributes for both node and edge creation.

    Also applies to: 43-43


    349-349: Improved toolbar disable condition.

    The condition now correctly checks both user role and schema existence.


    304-304: Verify the impact of new extension parameters.

    The addition of false, true parameters to extendNode and extendEdge needs verification.

    Run this script to check other extension calls:

    Also applies to: 307-307

    app/components/EditorComponent.tsx (4)

    81-81: LGTM! Fixed typo in keyword.

    The correction from "MARGE" to "MERGE" ensures accurate auto-completion and syntax highlighting.


    360-361: LGTM! Fixed memory leak.

    Properly disposing of the old suggestion provider before creating a new one prevents memory leaks and potential conflicts.


    475-475: LGTM! Enhanced cleanup function.

    Added proper disposal of the suggestion provider during component cleanup, preventing memory leaks.

    Also applies to: 477-477


    572-572: LGTM! Improved initial state.

    Setting isFirstLine to true initially is more accurate as the cursor starts at the first line, ensuring proper behavior of history navigation.

    app/schema/SchemaDataPanel.tsx (1)

    146-146: LGTM! Enhanced attributes count display.

    The improved styling with larger font size, bold weight, and primary color highlight makes the count more prominent and visually appealing.

    app/graph/Selector.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
    @FalkorDB FalkorDB deleted a comment from qodo-merge-pro bot Jan 21, 2025
    @FalkorDB FalkorDB deleted a comment from qodo-merge-pro bot Jan 21, 2025
    gkorland and others added 11 commits January 21, 2025 16:21
    …lity
    
    - Updated dynamic import for EditorComponent in GraphView for better readability.
    - Modified Toolbar to conditionally display add buttons based on the new displayAdd prop.
    - Removed hardcoded creation date from Selector component.
    - Adjusted disabled state logic in SchemaView and Toolbar to account for user roles.
    - Improved animation control visibility in GraphView based on graph elements.
    - Added a Sheet component for displaying additional information about the application.
    Copy link
    Contributor

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 3

    🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
    app/settings/Configurations.tsx (2)

    141-150: Enhance validation for MAX_INFO_QUERIES.

    While the upper bound check is good, consider adding validations for:

    • Negative numbers
    • Non-numeric input (NaN)
     if (name === "MAX_INFO_QUERIES") {
    -    if (Number(value) > 1000) {
    +    const numValue = Number(value);
    +    if (isNaN(numValue)) {
    +        toast({
    +            title: "Error",
    +            description: "Value must be a valid number",
    +            variant: "destructive"
    +        });
    +        return false;
    +    }
    +    if (numValue > 1000 || numValue < 0) {
             toast({
                 title: "Error",
    -            description: "Value must be less than 1000",
    +            description: "Value must be between 0 and 1000",
                 variant: "destructive"
             });
             return false;
         }
     }

    159-159: Remove unnecessary whitespace.

    This line contains only whitespace changes that don't affect functionality.

    -        
    +
    app/components/Header.tsx (2)

    55-109: Consider accessibility and type safety improvements.

    While the navigation structure is well-organized, there are a few suggestions for improvement:

    1. Add aria-label to the navigation menu for better accessibility
    2. Consider handling the case when onSetGraphName is undefined instead of using non-null assertion

    Apply these changes:

    -                        <NavigationMenu>
    +                        <NavigationMenu aria-label="Main">
    -                                        onSetGraphName={onSetGraphName!}
    +                                        onSetGraphName={onSetGraphName ?? (() => {})}

    110-127: Simplify version display.

    The version display uses unnecessary template literal syntax with curly braces.

    Apply this change:

    -                                <p>Version: {`{${pkg.version}}`}</p>
    +                                <p>Version: {pkg.version}</p>
    app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (1)

    115-131: Consider improving the double-click prevention logic.

    The current implementation might incorrectly prevent legitimate clicks on different nodes if they share the same name, as it uses the node name for comparison.

    Consider using the node's unique ID instead:

    -        if (now.getTime() - date.getTime() < 1000 && name === (node.data.name || node.id.toString())) {
    +        if (now.getTime() - date.getTime() < 1000 && name === node.id.toString()) {
               return
             }
    
    -        lastClick.current = { date: new Date(), name: node.data.name || node.id.toString() }
    +        lastClick.current = { date: new Date(), name: node.id.toString() }
    app/login/LoginForm.tsx (2)

    124-124: Consider improving image dimensions handling.

    While adding the priority prop is good for performance, the current dimensions (width=500, height=1) might cause aspect ratio issues and lack responsiveness.

    Consider using responsive dimensions and maintaining aspect ratio:

    -          <Image priority src="/BrowserLogo.svg" alt="Loading..." width={500} height={1} />
    +          <Image 
    +            priority 
    +            src="/BrowserLogo.svg" 
    +            alt="FalkorDB Browser Logo" 
    +            className="w-full max-w-[500px] h-auto" 
    +            width={500} 
    +            height={100} 
    +          />

    81-108: Consider enhancing form validation and error handling.

    The current error handling uses a generic "Invalid credentials" message. Consider implementing:

    1. Input validation for host and port
    2. More specific error messages based on the error type
    3. Rate limiting for login attempts

    Example implementation for input validation:

     const onSubmit = async (e: FormEvent) => {
       e.preventDefault();
    +  
    +  // Validate host format
    +  const hostRegex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9]([a-zA-Z0-9-]{0,61}[a-zA-Z0-9])?(\.[a-zA-Z0-9]([a-zA-Z0-9-]{0,61}[a-zA-Z0-9])?)*$/;
    +  if (!hostRegex.test(host.trim())) {
    +    setError({
    +      message: "Invalid host format",
    +      show: true
    +    });
    +    return;
    +  }
    +
    +  // Validate port range
    +  const portNum = parseInt(port.trim());
    +  if (isNaN(portNum) || portNum < 1 || portNum > 65535) {
    +    setError({
    +      message: "Port must be between 1 and 65535",
    +      show: true
    +    });
    +    return;
    +  }
    
       const params: SignInOptions = {
    app/components/CreateGraph.tsx (1)

    37-58: Optimize form submission and error handling.

    The form submission logic could be improved in several ways:

    1. Early return pattern for validation
    2. Consistent error handling
    3. Loading state during API call

    Consider this improved implementation:

    +const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false)
    
     const handleCreateGraph = async (e: React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) => {
       e.preventDefault()
    +  setIsLoading(true)
    +  try {
         const name = graphName.trim()
         if (!name) {
           toast({
             title: "Error",
             description: "Graph name cannot be empty",
             variant: "destructive"
           })
    +      setIsLoading(false)
           return
         }
         const q = 'RETURN 1'
         const result = await securedFetch(`api/graph/${prepareArg(name)}/?query=${prepareArg(q)}`, {
           method: "GET",
         }, toast)
    
    -    if (!result.ok) return
    +    if (!result.ok) {
    +      setIsLoading(false)
    +      return
    +    }
    
         onSetGraphName(name)
         setGraphName("")
         setOpen(false)
    +  } catch (error) {
    +    toast({
    +      title: "Error",
    +      description: "Failed to create graph",
    +      variant: "destructive"
    +    })
    +  } finally {
    +    setIsLoading(false)
    +  }
     }
    app/graph/labels.tsx (1)

    60-60: Extract color manipulation logic to improve readability.

    The inline style condition makes the code harder to read and maintain. Consider extracting this logic to a separate function or using CSS classes.

    Consider this improved implementation:

    +const getCategoryColor = (graph: Graph, category: Category, isRelationshipType: boolean) => {
    +  const baseColor = graph.getCategoryColorValue(category.index);
    +  return isRelationshipType ? lightenColor(baseColor) : baseColor;
    +}
    
    -<div style={{ backgroundColor: label === "RelationshipTypes" ? lightenColor(graph.getCategoryColorValue(category.index)) : graph.getCategoryColorValue(category.index) }} className={cn("min-w-6 min-h-6 rounded-full")} />
    +<div 
    +  style={{ backgroundColor: getCategoryColor(graph, category, label === "RelationshipTypes") }}
    +  className={cn("min-w-6 min-h-6 rounded-full")}
    +/>
    📜 Review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL
    Plan: Pro

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d7b554 and c715c86.

    📒 Files selected for processing (15)
    • app/components/CreateGraph.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/components/EditorComponent.tsx (14 hunks)
    • app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (6 hunks)
    • app/components/Header.tsx (3 hunks)
    • app/components/ui/Dropzone.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/components/ui/combobox.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/graph/GraphDataPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
    • app/graph/GraphView.tsx (3 hunks)
    • app/graph/Selector.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/graph/labels.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/graph/page.tsx (3 hunks)
    • app/login/LoginForm.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/schema/page.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/settings/Configurations.tsx (1 hunks)
    • lib/utils.ts (1 hunks)
    💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
    • app/graph/GraphDataPanel.tsx
    🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
    • app/graph/GraphView.tsx
    • app/graph/Selector.tsx
    ⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
    • GitHub Check: test
    • GitHub Check: test
    🔇 Additional comments (14)
    app/components/Header.tsx (2)

    12-14: LGTM! Well-structured imports.

    The new imports are properly organized and follow best practices.


    130-130: LGTM! Consistent class naming.

    The class name change maintains styling consistency.

    app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (3)

    9-9: LGTM! Added utility import for link color manipulation.

    The addition of lightenColor utility is well-aligned with the new link styling enhancements.


    54-73: Excellent implementation of resize handling!

    The resize handling implementation is robust and follows best practices:

    • Uses ResizeObserver for accurate element size tracking
    • Handles both element and window resize events
    • Properly cleans up listeners to prevent memory leaks

    257-303: Great improvements to link styling and visibility!

    The enhancements significantly improve the graph's usability:

    • Added background block for better label readability
    • Directional arrows clearly show relationships
    • Color variations effectively highlight interaction states
    app/login/LoginForm.tsx (2)

    121-121: LGTM! Background styling moved to layout level.

    The removal of bg-foreground class aligns with the architectural changes where background styling is now handled at the layout level.


    145-145: Verify the gradient styling implementation.

    The class name change from 'Top' to 'Gradient' should be verified to ensure consistent styling across the application.

    Let's check the CSS implementation:

    ✅ Verification successful

    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Search for both old and new class names in CSS files
    echo "Searching for old class name 'Top':"
    rg -l "\.Top\s*{" --type css
    
    echo "Searching for new class name 'Gradient':"
    rg -l "\.Gradient\s*{" --type css

    Length of output: 424


    Let's re-run the search using a corrected regex that properly escapes the curly braces. This should help us verify the presence (or absence) of the CSS classes.


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    echo "Searching for old class name 'Top' in CSS files:"
    rg -l "\\.Top\\s*\\{" --type css || echo "No matches found for '.Top'"
    
    echo "Searching for new class name 'Gradient' in CSS files:"
    rg -l "\\.Gradient\\s*\\{" --type css || echo "No matches found for '.Gradient'"

    Length of output: 391


    Gradient styling implementation verified.

    • The old class .Top is no longer present.
    • The new class .Gradient is defined in app/globals.css, confirming the intended update.
    app/components/ui/Dropzone.tsx (1)

    59-59: LGTM! Enhanced cursor styling.

    The cursor styling changes provide better visual feedback about the interactivity of the "Upload Certificate" text based on the disabled state.

    app/graph/page.tsx (1)

    132-132: LGTM! Added setHistoryQueries prop.

    The new prop correctly updates the queries state while preserving metadata.

    app/components/ui/combobox.tsx (1)

    112-116: LGTM! Improved empty value handling and key uniqueness.

    The changes enhance the component by:

    1. Displaying empty options as '""' for better visibility
    2. Ensuring key uniqueness by adding the 'key-' prefix
    app/components/EditorComponent.tsx (4)

    74-74: Fixed keyword typo.

    Corrected the misspelled keyword from "MARGE" to "MERGE".


    236-250: LGTM! Added ResizeObserver for better layout handling.

    The ResizeObserver implementation ensures that the editor layout is updated correctly when the container size changes.


    180-196: LGTM! Improved suggestions handling.

    The changes enhance the suggestions mechanism by:

    1. Consolidating keywords and functions into a single array
    2. Adding a reusable fetchSuggestions function
    3. Improving type handling for different suggestion kinds

    Also applies to: 281-309


    524-528: LGTM! Added history queries handling.

    The new handleSetHistoryQuery function correctly updates both the local state and parent component's history queries while preserving the current position in history.

    lib/utils.ts Outdated
    Comment on lines 46 to 59
    // Remove the # if present
    const color = hex.replace('#', '');
    // Convert to RGB
    const r = parseInt(color.slice(0, 2), 16);
    const g = parseInt(color.slice(2, 4), 16);
    const b = parseInt(color.slice(4, 6), 16);
    // Mix with white (add 20% of the remaining distance to white)
    const lightR = Math.min(255, r + Math.floor((255 - r) * 0.2));
    const lightG = Math.min(255, g + Math.floor((255 - g) * 0.2));
    const lightB = Math.min(255, b + Math.floor((255 - b) * 0.2));
    // Convert back to hex
    return `#${lightR.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightG.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightB.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}`;
    }
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    🛠️ Refactor suggestion

    Add input validation for hex color format.

    The lightenColor function assumes a valid 6-digit hex color format but lacks input validation. This could lead to runtime errors with invalid inputs.

    Consider this improved implementation:

     export const lightenColor = (hex: string): string => {
    +  // Validate hex color format
    +  const hexRegex = /^#?([A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/;
    +  if (!hexRegex.test(hex)) {
    +    throw new Error('Invalid hex color format');
    +  }
       // Remove the # if present
       const color = hex.replace('#', '');
    +  // Expand 3-digit hex to 6-digit
    +  const fullHex = color.length === 3 
    +    ? color.split('').map(c => c + c).join('')
    +    : color;
       // Convert to RGB
    -  const r = parseInt(color.slice(0, 2), 16);
    -  const g = parseInt(color.slice(2, 4), 16);
    -  const b = parseInt(color.slice(4, 6), 16);
    +  const r = parseInt(fullHex.slice(0, 2), 16);
    +  const g = parseInt(fullHex.slice(2, 4), 16);
    +  const b = parseInt(fullHex.slice(4, 6), 16);
       // Mix with white (add 20% of the remaining distance to white)
       const lightR = Math.min(255, r + Math.floor((255 - r) * 0.2));
       const lightG = Math.min(255, g + Math.floor((255 - g) * 0.2));
       const lightB = Math.min(255, b + Math.floor((255 - b) * 0.2));
       // Convert back to hex
       return `#${lightR.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightG.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightB.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}`;
     }
    📝 Committable suggestion

    ‼️ IMPORTANT
    Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    Suggested change
    export const lightenColor = (hex: string): string => {
    // Remove the # if present
    const color = hex.replace('#', '');
    // Convert to RGB
    const r = parseInt(color.slice(0, 2), 16);
    const g = parseInt(color.slice(2, 4), 16);
    const b = parseInt(color.slice(4, 6), 16);
    // Mix with white (add 20% of the remaining distance to white)
    const lightR = Math.min(255, r + Math.floor((255 - r) * 0.2));
    const lightG = Math.min(255, g + Math.floor((255 - g) * 0.2));
    const lightB = Math.min(255, b + Math.floor((255 - b) * 0.2));
    // Convert back to hex
    return `#${lightR.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightG.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightB.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}`;
    }
    export const lightenColor = (hex: string): string => {
    // Validate hex color format
    const hexRegex = /^#?([A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/;
    if (!hexRegex.test(hex)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid hex color format');
    }
    // Remove the # if present
    const color = hex.replace('#', '');
    // Expand 3-digit hex to 6-digit
    const fullHex = color.length === 3
    ? color.split('').map(c => c + c).join('')
    : color;
    // Convert to RGB
    const r = parseInt(fullHex.slice(0, 2), 16);
    const g = parseInt(fullHex.slice(2, 4), 16);
    const b = parseInt(fullHex.slice(4, 6), 16);
    // Mix with white (add 20% of the remaining distance to white)
    const lightR = Math.min(255, r + Math.floor((255 - r) * 0.2));
    const lightG = Math.min(255, g + Math.floor((255 - g) * 0.2));
    const lightB = Math.min(255, b + Math.floor((255 - b) * 0.2));
    // Convert back to hex
    return `#${lightR.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightG.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}${lightB.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')}`;
    }

    @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ export default function Page() {
    if (!result.ok) return
    const json = await result.json()
    const colors = localStorage.getItem(schemaName)?.split(/[[\]",]/).filter(c => c)
    setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, colors))
    setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, false, true, colors))
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    🛠️ Refactor suggestion

    Document the purpose of boolean parameters in Graph.create.

    The Graph.create method now accepts two additional boolean parameters, but their purpose is not clear from the code. This makes the code harder to maintain and understand.

    Consider using named parameters or constants to improve code clarity:

    -setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, false, true, colors))
    +const GRAPH_OPTIONS = {
    +  isDirected: false,
    +  isSchema: true
    +}
    +setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, GRAPH_OPTIONS.isDirected, GRAPH_OPTIONS.isSchema, colors))
    📝 Committable suggestion

    ‼️ IMPORTANT
    Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    Suggested change
    setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, false, true, colors))
    const GRAPH_OPTIONS = {
    isDirected: false,
    isSchema: true
    }
    setSchema(Graph.create(schemaName, json.result, GRAPH_OPTIONS.isDirected, GRAPH_OPTIONS.isSchema, colors))

    @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ export default function Page() {
    const queryArr = queries.some(q => q.text === query) ? queries : [...queries, { text: query, metadata: result.metadata }]
    setQueries(queryArr)
    localStorage.setItem("query history", JSON.stringify(queryArr))
    const g = Graph.create(graphName, result, graph.Colors)
    const g = Graph.create(graphName, result, false, false, graph.Colors)
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    💡 Verification agent

    🧩 Analysis chain

    Verify the new Graph.create parameters.

    The Graph.create method now accepts two additional boolean parameters, both set to false. Please ensure that these parameters are documented and their purpose is clear.

    Run the following script to check the method signature and documentation:

    Also applies to: 103-103


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Description: Check Graph.create method signature and documentation.
    
    # Search for Graph.create method definition
    ast-grep --pattern $'class Graph {
      $$$
      create($$$) {
        $$$
      }
      $$$
    }'

    Length of output: 78


    I'll gather more details on the Graph.create method's signature and its associated documentation. We need to verify that the two new boolean parameters (both set to false) are properly documented in the method's definition.

    Please run the following script to locate the file containing the Graph class and extract the context around the create( method:


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Locate the file containing the Graph class definition
    file=$(rg -l "class\s\+Graph" | head -n 1)
    if [ -z "$file" ]; then
      echo "No file with 'class Graph' found."
      exit 1
    fi
    echo "Found class Graph in: $file"
    echo ""
    # Display context around the 'create(' method within that file
    rg -C 15 "create\s*\(" "$file"

    Length of output: 154


    I'll run another search to locate the definition or documentation of the Graph.create method and its updated parameters. Let's try searching for any usage or declaration of Graph.create across the repository.

    Please run the following script:


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Search for any file that contains "Graph.create(" along with some context.
    rg -n -C 5 "Graph\.create\(" .

    Length of output: 4071


    I'll run another script to search for the exported definition of the Graph class, which might lead us to the implementation and documentation for Graph.create.

    Please run this shell script:


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Search for the exported definition of Graph class in the repository
    rg -l "export\s\+class\s\+Graph" .

    Length of output: 36


    I'll gather more information about where the Graph class is imported from and its definition to verify the new parameters. Please run the following script to search for Graph imports in the repository, starting with the affected file:


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Search for Graph imports in app/graph/page.tsx
    rg -n "import .*Graph" app/graph/page.tsx

    Length of output: 148


    I'll proceed by gathering further details from the file that exports the Graph class. Since Graph is imported from ../api/graph/model in app/graph/page.tsx, let’s inspect the method signature and documentation for Graph.create from that file.

    Please run the following script:


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Display the context around the Graph.create method in app/api/graph/model.ts
    rg -n -C 10 "create\s*\(" app/api/graph/model.ts

    Length of output: 1137

    Action Required: Document the New Parameters in Graph.create

    The Graph.create method in app/api/graph/model.ts now includes two new boolean parameters (isCollapsed and isSchema) that are not currently documented. Please add a descriptive comment or JSDoc block for these parameters to clarify their purpose. For example, you might explain:

    • isCollapsed: Indicates whether nodes should be rendered in a collapsed state.
    • isSchema: Specifies if the graph should be interpreted/constructed as a schema representation.

    This documentation will help maintain clarity for other developers.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 2

    ♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
    e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts (1)

    24-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

    Replace fixed timeouts with proper retry mechanism.

    Using fixed timeouts with setTimeout is unreliable and can lead to flaky tests.

    The polling implementation should include proper retry handling with timeout and exponential backoff as suggested in the previous review.

    Also applies to: 39-39

    🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
    e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts (3)

    150-157: Add error response validation.

    The test verifies that the user wasn't created but doesn't validate the API's error response. Consider checking the error message/code to ensure proper error handling.

     test(`@admin API Test: without passing a username, Attempt to add a user and validate the user was not added`, async () => {
         const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
         const username = ''
    -    await apiCall.createUsers({ username, password: user.password, role: user.ReadOnly });
    +    const response = await apiCall.createUsers({ username, password: user.password, role: user.ReadOnly });
         const users = await apiCall.getUsers()
         const User = users.result.find(u => u.username === username);
         expect(User).toBeUndefined();
    +    expect(response.error).toBeDefined();
    +    expect(response.error.message).toContain('username is required');
     });

    150-175: Consider additional edge cases for invalid inputs.

    The tests currently use empty strings for invalid inputs. Consider testing with undefined, null, and other edge cases.

    +const invalidInputs = [
    +  { type: 'undefined', value: undefined },
    +  { type: 'null', value: null },
    +  { type: 'empty string', value: '' },
    +  { type: 'whitespace', value: '   ' }
    +];
    +
    +invalidInputs.forEach(({ type, value }) => {
    +  test(`@admin API Test: with ${type} username, Attempt to add a user and validate the user was not added`, async () => {
    +    const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    +    await apiCall.createUsers({ username: value, password: user.password, role: user.ReadOnly });
    +    const users = await apiCall.getUsers()
    +    const User = users.result.find(u => u.username === value);
    +    expect(User).toBeUndefined();
    +  });
    +});

    150-175: Add retry mechanism for eventual consistency.

    The tests immediately check for user existence after API calls. Consider adding a retry mechanism to handle potential delays in user list updates.

    async function waitForUserExistence(apiCall: ApiCalls, username: string, shouldExist: boolean, maxAttempts = 3): Promise<void> {
      for (let attempt = 0; attempt < maxAttempts; attempt++) {
        const users = await apiCall.getUsers();
        const user = users.result.find(u => u.username === username);
        if ((shouldExist && user) || (!shouldExist && !user)) {
          return;
        }
        await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000));
      }
      throw new Error(`User ${shouldExist ? 'not found' : 'still exists'} after ${maxAttempts} attempts`);
    }

    Usage example:

     test(`@admin API Test: without passing a username, Attempt to add a user and validate the user was not added`, async () => {
         const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
         const username = ''
         await apiCall.createUsers({ username, password: user.password, role: user.ReadOnly });
    -    const users = await apiCall.getUsers()
    -    const User = users.result.find(u => u.username === username);
    -    expect(User).toBeUndefined();
    +    await waitForUserExistence(apiCall, username, false);
     });
    e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts (2)

    152-152: Use const instead of let for variables that aren't reassigned.

    The value variable is declared with let but never reassigned in multiple test cases.

    Replace let with const in these declarations to better indicate the immutability of these values.

    Also applies to: 161-161, 170-170, 179-179, 188-188, 197-197, 206-206, 228-228

    🧰 Tools
    🪛 ESLint

    [error] 152-152: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

    (prefer-const)


    215-217: Simplify nested ternary expression for better readability.

    The nested ternary expression makes the code harder to read and maintain.

    Consider using a more readable approach:

    -        value = value === '1' ? 'yes' : value === '0' ? 'no' : value;
    +        const valueMap = {
    +          '1': 'yes',
    +          '0': 'no'
    +        };
    +        value = valueMap[value] || value;
    🧰 Tools
    🪛 ESLint

    [error] 216-216: Do not nest ternary expressions.

    (no-nested-ternary)

    📜 Review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL
    Plan: Pro

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c715c86 and a5c2bb8.

    📒 Files selected for processing (3)
    • .github/workflows/playwright.yml (1 hunks)
    • e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts (1 hunks)
    • e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts (1 hunks)
    🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
    • .github/workflows/playwright.yml
    🧰 Additional context used
    🪛 ESLint
    e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts

    [error] 152-152: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

    (prefer-const)


    [error] 161-161: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

    (prefer-const)


    [error] 170-170: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

    (prefer-const)


    [error] 179-179: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

    (prefer-const)


    [error] 188-188: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

    (prefer-const)


    [error] 197-197: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

    (prefer-const)


    [error] 206-206: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

    (prefer-const)


    [error] 216-216: Do not nest ternary expressions.

    (no-nested-ternary)


    [error] 228-228: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

    (prefer-const)

    ⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
    • GitHub Check: test
    • GitHub Check: test
    🔇 Additional comments (1)
    e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts (1)

    149-149: LGTM!

    The added newline improves code readability by separating test groups.

    Comment on lines +20 to 146
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.defaultTimeOut, "0")
    }
    });
    })

    Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }) => {
    Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => {
    test(`@admin Modify ${roles.resultSetSize} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => {
    const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
    const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.resultSetSize, input)
    await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage()
    const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.resultSetSize)
    expect(value === input).toBe(expected)
    expect(value === input).toBe(expected);
    if (index === Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.length - 1) {
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.resultSetSize, "10000")
    }
    });
    })

    Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }) => {
    Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => {
    test(`@admin Modify ${roles.queryMemCapacity} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => {
    const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
    const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.queryMemCapacity, input)
    await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage()
    const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.queryMemCapacity)
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.queryMemCapacity, "0") // update to default values
    expect(value === input).toBe(expected)
    const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.queryMemCapacity)
    expect(value === input).toBe(expected);
    if (index === Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.length - 1) {
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.queryMemCapacity, "0")
    }
    });
    })

    Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }) => {
    Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => {
    test(`@admin Modify ${roles.vKeyMaxEntityCount} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => {
    const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
    const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.vKeyMaxEntityCount, input)
    await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage()
    const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.vKeyMaxEntityCount)
    expect(value === input).toBe(expected)
    if (index === Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.length - 1) {
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.vKeyMaxEntityCount, "100000")
    }
    });
    })

    Data.CMDData.forEach(({ input, description, expected }) => {
    Data.CMDData.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => {
    test(`@admin Modify ${roles.cmdInfo} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => {
    const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
    const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.cmdInfo, input)
    await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage()
    const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.cmdInfo)
    expect(value === input).toBe(expected)
    if (index === Data.CMDData.length - 1) {
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.cmdInfo, "yes")
    }
    });
    })

    Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }) => {
    Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => {
    test(`@admin Modify ${roles.maxInfoQueries} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => {
    const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
    const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, input)
    await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage()
    const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)
    expect(value === input).toBe(expected)
    });
    })

    Data.roleModificationData.forEach(({ role, input, description, expected }) => {
    test(`@admin Modify ${role} via UI validation via API: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => {
    const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
    await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(role, input)
    const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    let value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(role)).config[1]);
    // Convert numeric values to yes/no for boolean settings
    if (value === '1') {
    value = 'yes';
    } else if (value === '0') {
    value = 'no';
    expect(value === input).toBe(expected);
    if (index === Data.inputDataAcceptsZero.length - 1) {
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000");
    }
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.queryMemCapacity, "0") // update to default values
    expect(value === input).toBe(expected)
    });
    })
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    🛠️ Refactor suggestion

    Reduce code duplication by extracting common test logic.

    The test cases follow a similar pattern and could be refactored into a reusable helper function to improve maintainability.

    Consider refactoring the repeated test logic into a helper function:

    async function testSettingsRole(
      browser: BrowserWrapper,
      role: string,
      testData: Array<{input: string, description: string, expected: boolean}>,
      defaultValue: string
    ) {
      testData.forEach(({ input, description, expected }, index) => {
        test(`@admin Modify ${role} via API validation via UI: Input value: ${input} description: ${description}`, async () => {
          const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl);
          const apiCall = new ApiCalls();
          await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(role, input);
          await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage();
          const value = await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(role);
          expect(value === input).toBe(expected);
          if (index === testData.length - 1) {
            await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(role, defaultValue);
          }
        });
      });
    }
    
    // Usage:
    testSettingsRole(browser, roles.maxQueuedQueries, Data.inputDataRejectsZero, "25");
    testSettingsRole(browser, roles.TimeOut, Data.inputDataAcceptsZero, "1000");
    // ... etc

    Comment on lines +221 to +231
    test(`@admin Modify maxInfoQueries via UI validation via API: Input value: ${Data.roleModificationData[8].input}`, async () => {
    const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
    await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input)
    await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage();
    await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable();
    await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries);
    const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    let value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]);
    expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input);
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000");
    });
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    🛠️ Refactor suggestion

    Add error handling for API calls and UI interactions.

    The test assumes all operations will succeed without proper error handling.

    Consider adding try-catch blocks and timeout handling:

         test(`@admin Modify maxInfoQueries via UI validation via API: Input value: ${Data.roleModificationData[8].input}`, async () => {
             const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
    -        await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input)
    -        await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage();
    -        await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable();
    -        await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries);
    -        const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    -        let value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]);
    -        expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input);
    -        await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000");
    +        try {
    +          await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input)
    +          await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage();
    +          await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable();
    +          await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries);
    +          const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    +          const value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]);
    +          expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input);
    +        } catch (error) {
    +          throw new Error(`Failed to modify maxInfoQueries: ${error.message}`);
    +        } finally {
    +          const apiCall = new ApiCalls();
    +          await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000");
    +        }
    📝 Committable suggestion

    ‼️ IMPORTANT
    Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    Suggested change
    test(`@admin Modify maxInfoQueries via UI validation via API: Input value: ${Data.roleModificationData[8].input}`, async () => {
    const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
    await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input)
    await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage();
    await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable();
    await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries);
    const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    let value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]);
    expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input);
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000");
    });
    test(`@admin Modify maxInfoQueries via UI validation via API: Input value: ${Data.roleModificationData[8].input}`, async () => {
    const settingsConfigPage = await browser.createNewPage(SettingsConfigPage, urls.settingsUrl)
    try {
    await settingsConfigPage.modifyRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries, Data.roleModificationData[8].input)
    await settingsConfigPage.refreshPage();
    await settingsConfigPage.scrollToBottomInTable();
    await settingsConfigPage.getRoleContentValue(roles.maxInfoQueries);
    const apiCall = new ApiCalls()
    const value = String((await apiCall.getSettingsRoleValue(roles.maxInfoQueries)).config[1]);
    expect(value).toBe(Data.roleModificationData[8].input);
    } catch (error) {
    throw new Error(`Failed to modify maxInfoQueries: ${error.message}`);
    } finally {
    const apiCall = new ApiCalls();
    await apiCall.modifySettingsRole(roles.maxInfoQueries, "1000");
    }
    });
    🧰 Tools
    🪛 ESLint

    [error] 228-228: 'value' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

    (prefer-const)

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 5

    ♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
    lib/utils.ts (1)

    48-90: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

    Add input validation for hex color format.

    The rgbToHSL function assumes a valid hex color format but lacks input validation.

     export function rgbToHSL(hex: string): string {
    +  // Validate hex color format
    +  const hexRegex = /^#?([A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/;
    +  if (!hexRegex.test(hex)) {
    +    throw new Error('Invalid hex color format');
    +  }
       // Remove the # if present
       const formattedHex = hex.replace(/^#/, '');
    +  // Expand 3-digit hex to 6-digit
    +  const fullHex = formattedHex.length === 3 
    +    ? formattedHex.split('').map(c => c + c).join('')
    +    : formattedHex;
    🧹 Nitpick comments (18)
    app/components/DialogComponent.tsx (1)

    40-47: Great accessibility enhancement!

    The modified description rendering ensures consistent dialog structure by always including DialogDescription, making it more reliable for screen readers while maintaining a clean visual experience.

    This pattern of maintaining consistent DOM structure with VisuallyHidden is a great practice for other similar components in the codebase.

    app/components/FormComponent.tsx (1)

    78-85: Add accessibility attributes to the tooltip.

    The tooltip implementation is clean and well-structured. Consider enhancing accessibility with these improvements:

     <Tooltip>
         <TooltipTrigger asChild>
    -        <InfoIcon size={20} />
    +        <InfoIcon 
    +            size={20}
    +            aria-label={`More information about ${field.label}`}
    +        />
         </TooltipTrigger>
    -    <TooltipContent>
    +    <TooltipContent
    +        id={`${field.label.toLowerCase()}-tooltip`}
    +        role="tooltip"
    +    >
             {field.info}
         </TooltipContent>
     </Tooltip>
    app/graph/Tutorial.tsx (3)

    36-36: Consider adding a title or removing empty DrawerTitle.

    The empty DrawerTitle component doesn't serve any purpose. Consider either adding a meaningful title for accessibility or removing the component if not needed.

    -<DrawerTitle />
    +<DrawerTitle>Tutorial</DrawerTitle>

    45-45: Maintain consistent padding across carousel items.

    The padding (p-32) is inconsistent with other carousel items that use p-40. Consider maintaining consistent padding for visual harmony.

    -<CarouselItem className="border text-center p-32">
    +<CarouselItem className="border text-center p-40">

    46-48: Improve text formatting for better readability.

    The multi-line text formatting could be improved for better readability and maintainability.

    -                                <p>Interact with your data with a force-directed layout,
    -                                    with features including zoom, pan,
    -                                    node-drag and interactive node/link hover and click events</p>
    +                                <p>
    +                                    Interact with your data using a force-directed layout with features like zoom,
    +                                    pan, node-drag, and interactive node/link events
    +                                </p>
    app/page.tsx (2)

    9-13: Consider improving the Image component configuration.

    While the layout structure is good, the Image component could be improved:

    -        <Image style={{ width: 'auto', height: '100px' }} priority src="/BrowserLogo.svg" alt="FalkorDB Logo" width={0} height={0} />
    +        <Image
    +          className="h-[100px] w-auto"
    +          priority
    +          src="/BrowserLogo.svg"
    +          alt="FalkorDB Logo"
    +          width={400}
    +          height={100}
    +        />

    This change:

    • Moves styling to className for better consistency
    • Sets proper width/height props for better image optimization
    • Improves code readability with proper formatting

    15-15: Simplify the version string template.

    The version string template has unnecessary braces.

    -        <p>Version: {`{${pkg.version}}`}</p>
    +        <p>Version: {pkg.version}</p>
    e2e/logic/POM/settingsUsersPage.ts (2)

    23-25: Consider using more descriptive locators
    Using a direct XPath to locate this edit button may become fragile if the DOM structure changes. Consider using data-testid or semantic attributes for a more stable and readable locator.


    104-106: Ensure element readiness before interaction
    Hovering the row and clicking two different buttons in quick succession could fail if the UI introduces a delay. Consider verifying visibility or waiting for the button to be enabled before clicking to avoid flaky tests.

    app/components/TableComponent.tsx (1)

    15-15: LGTM! Consider using a discriminated union for Cell type.

    The new imports and type updates look good. The Promise return type for onChange is a good choice for async operations.

    Consider using a discriminated union for the Cell type to make it more type-safe:

    -type Cell = {
    -    value: DataCell,
    -    onChange?: (value: string) => Promise<boolean>,
    -    type?: string
    -    comboboxType?: string
    -}
    +type BaseCell = {
    +    value: DataCell,
    +    onChange?: (value: string) => Promise<boolean>,
    +}
    +
    +type InputCell = BaseCell & {
    +    type: undefined
    +}
    +
    +type ComboboxCell = BaseCell & {
    +    type: "combobox"
    +    comboboxType: string
    +}
    +
    +type Cell = InputCell | ComboboxCell

    Also applies to: 19-19, 23-25

    app/settings/users/Users.tsx (1)

    29-44: Consider adding error handling for role updates.

    The role update logic is well-implemented with undo functionality. However, consider adding specific error handling for different failure scenarios.

    Add error handling:

     const handleSetRole = async (username: string, role: string, oldRole?: string) => {
         const result = await securedFetch(`api/user/${prepareArg(username)}?userRole=${role}`, {
             method: 'PATCH'
         }, session?.user?.role, toast)
    
         if (result.ok) {
             setUsers(prev => prev.map(user => user.username === username ? { ...user, role } : user))
             setRows(prev => prev.map(row => row.cells[0].value === username ? { ...row, cells: [row.cells[0], { ...row.cells[1], value: role }] } : row))
    
             toast({
                 title: "Success",
                 description: `${username} role updated successfully`,
                 action: oldRole ? <ToastAction altText="Undo" onClick={() => handleSetRole(username, oldRole)}>Undo</ToastAction> : undefined
             })
    +    } else {
    +        const errorData = await result.json().catch(() => ({ error: 'Unknown error occurred' }))
    +        toast({
    +            title: "Error",
    +            description: errorData.error || `Failed to update role for ${username}`,
    +            variant: "destructive"
    +        })
         }
     }
    app/settings/page.tsx (1)

    38-38: Enhance button accessibility with ARIA attributes.

    The button styling logic improvement is good. Consider adding ARIA attributes to enhance accessibility.

    Add ARIA attributes by applying this diff:

         <Button
    -        className={cn("p-2 rounded-lg", current === "DB" ? "bg-background" : "text-gray-500")}
    +        className={cn("p-2 rounded-lg", current === "DB" ? "bg-background" : "text-gray-500")}
    +        aria-pressed={current === "DB"}
    +        aria-label="Database Configuration Tab"
             label="DB Configuration"
             onClick={() => setCurrent("DB")}
         />
         <Button
    -        className={cn("p-2 rounded-lg", current === "Users" ? "bg-background" : "text-gray-500")}
    +        className={cn("p-2 rounded-lg", current === "Users" ? "bg-background" : "text-gray-500")}
    +        aria-pressed={current === "Users"}
    +        aria-label="Users Tab"
             label="Users"
             onClick={() => setCurrent("Users")}
         />

    Also applies to: 43-43

    app/components/graph/DeleteGraph.tsx (1)

    4-4: Add error handling for missing session data and enhance delete confirmation.

    The integration of session management is good. However, consider adding error handling and enhancing the delete confirmation UX.

    Add error handling and enhance delete confirmation by applying this diff:

         const deleteGraph = async () => {
    +        if (!session?.user?.role) {
    +            toast({
    +                title: "Error",
    +                description: "Session data is missing",
    +                variant: "destructive",
    +            });
    +            return;
    +        }
    +
             const name = `${graphName}${isSchema ? "_schema" : ""}`
    +        // Add confirmation text validation
    +        const confirmText = await new Promise<string>((resolve) => {
    +            const text = window.prompt(`Type "${name}" to confirm deletion:`);
    +            resolve(text || "");
    +        });
    +
    +        if (confirmText !== name) {
    +            toast({
    +                title: "Cancelled",
    +                description: "Graph deletion was cancelled",
    +            });
    +            return;
    +        }
    +
             const result = await securedFetch(`/api/graph/${prepareArg(name)}`, {
                 method: "DELETE",
    -        }, session?.user?.role, toast);
    +        }, session.user.role, toast);

    Also applies to: 16-16, 22-22

    app/graph/Duplicate.tsx (1)

    25-29: Consider adding error message handling.

    While the error handling is good, consider extracting the error message from the response for more specific feedback to users.

    -        if (!result.ok) return
    +        if (!result.ok) {
    +            const errorMessage = await result.text()
    +            toast({
    +                title: "Error duplicating graph",
    +                description: errorMessage || "Failed to duplicate graph",
    +                variant: "destructive"
    +            })
    +            return
    +        }
    app/components/ExportGraph.tsx (1)

    21-48: Consider using Promise.all for parallel exports.

    The current implementation processes exports sequentially. For better performance with multiple selections, consider using Promise.all.

     const handleExport = () => {
    -    selectedValues.map(async value => {
    +    Promise.all(selectedValues.map(async value => {
         const name = `${value}${!type ? "_schema" : ""}`
         const result = await securedFetch(`api/graph/${prepareArg(name)}/export`, {
             method: "GET"
         }, session?.user?.role, toast)
    
         if (!result.ok) return
    
         const blob = await result.blob()
         const url = window.URL.createObjectURL(blob)
         try {
             const link = document.createElement('a')
             link.href = url
             link.setAttribute('download', `${name}.dump`)
             document.body.appendChild(link)
             link.click()
             link.parentNode?.removeChild(link)
             window.URL.revokeObjectURL(url)
         } catch (e) {
             toast({
                 title: "Error",
                 description: "Error while exporting data",
                 variant: "destructive"
             })
         }
    -    })
    +    }))
    app/globals.css (2)

    34-34: Consider removing !important and using CSS custom properties for font-family.

    The font-family updates look good, but consider:

    1. Removing the !important declaration and using proper CSS specificity.
    2. Moving the font-family declaration to the :root selector for better maintainability.
     @layer base {
         :root {
             /* ... other custom properties ... */
    +        --font-family: 'FiraCode', 'Arial', monospace;
         }
    +    
    +    body {
    +        font-family: var(--font-family);
    +    }
     }
    
    -* {
    -    font-family: 'FiraCode', 'Arial', monospace !important;
    -}

    Also applies to: 71-71


    52-54: Consider using CSS custom properties for gradient colors.

    The gradient implementation looks good, but consider using CSS custom properties for the colors to maintain consistency and enable easier theme customization.

     @layer base {
         :root {
             /* ... other custom properties ... */
    +        --gradient-start: #EC806C;
    +        --gradient-middle: #B66EBD;
    +        --gradient-end: #7568F2;
         }
     }
    
     .Gradient {
    -    background: linear-gradient(90deg, #EC806C 0%, #B66EBD 43.41%, #7568F2 100%);
    +    background: linear-gradient(90deg, 
    +        var(--gradient-start) 0%, 
    +        var(--gradient-middle) 43.41%, 
    +        var(--gradient-end) 100%
    +    );
     }
    app/graph/toolbar.tsx (1)

    58-82: Consider moving ESLint disable comment to component level.

    The implementation looks good, but the ESLint disable comment for jsx-a11y/anchor-is-valid could be moved to the component level with other ESLint configurations for better maintainability.

     'use client'
    
    /* eslint-disable react/require-default-props */
    +/* eslint-disable jsx-a11y/anchor-is-valid */
    
    import { Link, PlusCircle, Shrink, Trash2, ZoomIn, ZoomOut } from "lucide-react";
    📜 Review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL
    Plan: Pro

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a5c2bb8 and 8c49231.

    ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
    • public/fonts/obviously_narrow.woff is excluded by !**/*.woff
    • public/fonts/obviously_narrow.woff2 is excluded by !**/*.woff2
    • public/fonts/oswald.ttf is excluded by !**/*.ttf
    📒 Files selected for processing (43)
    • app/api/graph/model.ts (14 hunks)
    • app/api/user/[user]/route.ts (1 hunks)
    • app/api/user/route.ts (0 hunks)
    • app/components/CreateGraph.tsx (5 hunks)
    • app/components/DialogComponent.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/components/EditorComponent.tsx (14 hunks)
    • app/components/ExportGraph.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (6 hunks)
    • app/components/FormComponent.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/components/Header.tsx (3 hunks)
    • app/components/TableComponent.tsx (4 hunks)
    • app/components/graph/DeleteGraph.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/components/ui/Button.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/components/ui/combobox.tsx (9 hunks)
    • app/create/page.tsx (0 hunks)
    • app/globals.css (3 hunks)
    • app/graph/Duplicate.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/graph/GraphDataPanel.tsx (11 hunks)
    • app/graph/GraphView.tsx (6 hunks)
    • app/graph/Selector.tsx (7 hunks)
    • app/graph/Tutorial.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/graph/View.tsx (5 hunks)
    • app/graph/labels.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/graph/page.tsx (5 hunks)
    • app/graph/toolbar.tsx (3 hunks)
    • app/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/login/LoginForm.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/monitor/page.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/page.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/schema/SchemaCreateElement.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/schema/SchemaDataPanel.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/schema/SchemaView.tsx (10 hunks)
    • app/schema/page.tsx (3 hunks)
    • app/settings/Configurations.tsx (4 hunks)
    • app/settings/page.tsx (1 hunks)
    • app/settings/users/AddUser.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/settings/users/DeleteUser.tsx (2 hunks)
    • app/settings/users/Users.tsx (4 hunks)
    • e2e/logic/POM/navBarComponent.ts (1 hunks)
    • e2e/logic/POM/settingsConfigPage.ts (3 hunks)
    • e2e/logic/POM/settingsUsersPage.ts (2 hunks)
    • e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts (3 hunks)
    • lib/utils.ts (2 hunks)
    💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
    • app/create/page.tsx
    • app/api/user/route.ts
    🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (16)
    • app/graph/labels.tsx
    • app/login/LoginForm.tsx
    • app/schema/SchemaCreateElement.tsx
    • app/schema/SchemaDataPanel.tsx
    • app/settings/Configurations.tsx
    • app/components/CreateGraph.tsx
    • app/graph/Selector.tsx
    • app/components/Header.tsx
    • app/components/ui/combobox.tsx
    • app/schema/SchemaView.tsx
    • app/layout.tsx
    • app/graph/View.tsx
    • e2e/logic/POM/settingsConfigPage.ts
    • app/graph/GraphView.tsx
    • e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts
    • app/api/graph/model.ts
    ⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
    • GitHub Check: test
    • GitHub Check: test
    🔇 Additional comments (39)
    app/components/DialogComponent.tsx (1)

    6-6: LGTM! Good accessibility improvement.

    The addition of VisuallyHidden from Radix UI is a good choice for improving accessibility.

    app/components/FormComponent.tsx (1)

    7-7: LGTM! Import changes are well-organized.

    The new imports for tooltip components and icons are properly structured and align with the component's enhanced functionality.

    Also applies to: 9-9

    app/page.tsx (2)

    4-5: LGTM! Imports are appropriate for the new functionality.

    The new imports support the added features - Image for logo display and pkg for version information.


    18-18: Verify the Gradient class styling.

    Ensure that the Gradient class is properly defined in your CSS files.

    ✅ Verification successful

    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Search for the Gradient class definition
    rg -t css "\.Gradient" 

    Length of output: 56


    Gradient styling verified in app/globals.css
    The Gradient class is defined as expected in app/globals.css. No further changes are needed.

    e2e/logic/POM/settingsUsersPage.ts (2)

    27-29: Looks good
    This locator approach is concise and consistent with the rest of the codebase. No issues found here.


    31-32: Consistent approach for role button locator
    This is similarly structured and works well. No immediate concerns.

    app/components/TableComponent.tsx (2)

    37-39: LGTM! Props interface and component signature are well-defined.

    The Props interface and component signature are properly updated to include the optional options array.

    Also applies to: 41-41


    213-220: LGTM! Tooltip implementation improves user experience.

    The tooltip addition is a good UX improvement, showing the full cell value on hover.

    app/settings/users/DeleteUser.tsx (4)

    8-9: LGTM!

    The new imports and interface updates are correctly implemented to support session management and row state synchronization.

    Also applies to: 14-14


    17-18: LGTM!

    The function signature and session hook are properly implemented for role-based access control.


    30-30: LGTM!

    The session role is correctly passed to securedFetch for role-based access control.


    38-38: LGTM!

    The row state update correctly synchronizes with user deletion, maintaining consistency between users and rows.

    app/settings/users/Users.tsx (5)

    11-11: LGTM!

    Session management is properly set up for role-based access control.

    Also applies to: 27-27


    53-53: LGTM!

    The user fetch logic is properly updated with role-based access control, and the row mapping is more maintainable.

    Also applies to: 58-64


    80-80: LGTM!

    The user addition logic correctly integrates role-based access control and maintains state consistency.

    Also applies to: 88-98


    108-108: LGTM!

    The role options are correctly passed to the table component.


    112-112: LGTM!

    The DeleteUser component integration is properly updated with row state management.

    app/graph/Duplicate.tsx (2)

    4-4: LGTM! Good addition of session management.

    The integration of useSession hook enhances security by enabling role-based access control.

    Also applies to: 19-19


    32-36: LGTM! Good user feedback.

    The success toast provides clear feedback to users about the operation's outcome.

    lib/utils.ts (2)

    14-24: LGTM! Good enhancement of securedFetch with role-based access.

    The addition of the role parameter and its integration into the URL improves security by enabling role-based access control.


    27-38: LGTM! Improved error handling.

    Good improvement in error handling by using response.text() for error messages and handling authentication failures appropriately.

    app/components/ExportGraph.tsx (1)

    1-13: LGTM! Good component flexibility.

    The addition of the trigger prop enhances component reusability.

    app/components/ui/Button.tsx (1)

    46-77: LGTM! Good accessibility and UX improvements.

    The addition of tooltips and aria-labels enhances both accessibility and user experience. The conditional rendering is well implemented.

    app/schema/page.tsx (2)

    26-28: LGTM! Role-based access control is properly implemented.

    The securedFetch calls now correctly include the user's role from the session, enhancing security through proper role-based access control.

    Also applies to: 30-32, 43-45


    49-49: Document the purpose of boolean parameters in Graph.create.

    The Graph.create method now accepts two additional boolean parameters (false and true), but their purpose is not clear from the code.

    app/settings/users/AddUser.tsx (1)

    10-10: LGTM! UI structure is properly updated.

    The component structure is updated to use SheetDescription instead of SheetHeader, maintaining proper UI hierarchy.

    Also applies to: 138-138

    app/graph/page.tsx (3)

    35-37: LGTM! Role-based access control is properly implemented.

    The securedFetch calls now correctly include the user's role from the session, enhancing security through proper role-based access control.

    Also applies to: 39-41, 71-73


    90-90: Document the purpose of boolean parameters in Graph.create.

    The Graph.create method now accepts two additional boolean parameters (both set to false), but their purpose is not clear from the code.

    Also applies to: 103-103


    132-132: LGTM! History queries are properly handled.

    The setHistoryQueries function correctly preserves metadata while updating the query text, ensuring that no data is lost during updates.

    app/components/ForceGraph.tsx (3)

    57-75: LGTM! Resize handling is improved with ResizeObserver.

    The resize handling is now more robust using ResizeObserver with proper cleanup in the cleanup function. This is a better approach than relying solely on window resize events.


    124-140: LGTM! Click handling prevents rapid double-clicks.

    The click handling now includes debouncing to prevent rapid double-clicks on the same node, improving user experience.


    305-308: LGTM! Link visuals are enhanced.

    The graph links now have proper directional arrows and colors, improving the visual representation of relationships between nodes.

    app/graph/GraphDataPanel.tsx (1)

    12-12: LGTM! Improved session management.

    The changes improve the component by:

    • Removing prop drilling by using the useSession hook directly.
    • Maintaining consistent session access pattern across the application.

    Also applies to: 29-29, 41-41, 70-70, 241-241, 361-361

    app/components/EditorComponent.tsx (4)

    73-73: Fixed keyword typo.

    Corrected the misspelled keyword from "MARGE" to "MERGE".


    179-195: Improved suggestion handling.

    The new SUGGESTIONS array combines keywords and functions into a single structure, making the suggestion mechanism more maintainable and efficient.


    234-251: Enhanced resize handling.

    Added a ResizeObserver to properly handle editor resizing when the container size changes.


    525-529: Improved history management.

    Added handleSetHistoryQuery to properly manage and sync history queries across the application.

    app/graph/toolbar.tsx (2)

    29-30: LGTM!

    Props destructuring correctly aligns with the interface changes.


    93-93: LGTM!

    The disabled state logic correctly combines both deleteDisabled and global disabled props.

    @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ export default class NavBarComponent extends BasePage {
    }

    private get graphsButton(): Locator {
    return this.page.getByRole("button", { name: "Graphs" });
    return this.page.locator("//button[contains(text(), 'Graphs')]");
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    🛠️ Refactor suggestion

    Revert to using getByRole for better maintainability and accessibility.

    The XPath locator makes the test more brittle and deviates from Playwright's best practices. Consider these alternatives in order of preference:

    1. Revert to the original locator (preferred):
    -        return this.page.locator("//button[contains(text(), 'Graphs')]");
    +        return this.page.getByRole("button", { name: "Graphs" });
    1. If the button is not properly labeled, fix the accessibility attributes in the component instead of using XPath.

    2. If getByRole doesn't work, try other built-in locators before using XPath:

    return this.page.getByText("Graphs", { exact: true });
    // or
    return this.page.getByTestId("graphs-button");

    This maintains consistency with other button locators in the file and follows Playwright's best practices.

    Comment on lines +161 to 169
    cell.type === "combobox" ?
    <Combobox
    options={options!}
    setSelectedValue={(value) => {
    cell.onChange!(value)
    handleSetEditable("", "")
    }}
    type={cell.comboboxType}
    />
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    ⚠️ Potential issue

    Add proper error handling and null checks in combobox implementation.

    The current implementation has several issues:

    1. Non-null assertions (!.) should be avoided
    2. Missing error handling for onChange

    Apply this diff to improve type safety and error handling:

     cell.type === "combobox" ?
         <Combobox
    -        options={options!}
    -        setSelectedValue={(value) => {
    -            cell.onChange!(value)
    -            handleSetEditable("", "")
    +        options={options ?? []}
    +        setSelectedValue={async (value) => {
    +            if (!cell.onChange) return;
    +            try {
    +                const success = await cell.onChange(value);
    +                if (success) {
    +                    handleSetEditable("", "")
    +                }
    +            } catch (error) {
    +                console.error('Failed to update value:', error);
    +            }
             }}
             type={cell.comboboxType}
         />
    📝 Committable suggestion

    ‼️ IMPORTANT
    Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    Suggested change
    cell.type === "combobox" ?
    <Combobox
    options={options!}
    setSelectedValue={(value) => {
    cell.onChange!(value)
    handleSetEditable("", "")
    }}
    type={cell.comboboxType}
    />
    cell.type === "combobox" ?
    <Combobox
    options={options ?? []}
    setSelectedValue={async (value) => {
    if (!cell.onChange) return;
    try {
    const success = await cell.onChange(value);
    if (success) {
    handleSetEditable("", "")
    }
    } catch (error) {
    console.error('Failed to update value:', error);
    }
    }}
    type={cell.comboboxType}
    />

    @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ export async function PATCH(req: NextRequest, { params }: { params: Promise<{ us
    }

    const { user: username } = await params
    const role = ROLE.get(req.nextUrl.searchParams.get("role") || "")
    const role = ROLE.get(req.nextUrl.searchParams.get("userRole") || "")
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    💡 Verification agent

    🧩 Analysis chain

    LGTM! Verify the impact of renaming the query parameter.

    The change from "role" to "userRole" is valid. However, ensure that all client-side code has been updated to use the new parameter name.

    Run the following script to verify the parameter usage:


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Description: Search for any remaining usage of the old parameter name.
    
    # Test: Search for "role" parameter in API calls. Expect: Only occurrences of "userRole".
    rg -A 5 $'searchParams\.get\("role"\)'

    Length of output: 495

    Inconsistent Query Parameter Name Detected

    The renaming to "userRole" was correctly applied in app/api/user/[user]/route.ts, but the search reveals that app/api/graph/[graph]/route.ts still uses the old parameter "role". Please review whether this endpoint should also be updated to "userRole" to maintain consistency with client-side expectations.

    @@ -4,19 +4,21 @@ import useSWR from 'swr'
    import React, { useState } from 'react'
    import { securedFetch } from '@/lib/utils'
    import { useToast } from '@/components/ui/use-toast'
    import { useSession } from 'next-auth/react'
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    🛠️ Refactor suggestion

    Add error handling for missing session data.

    The integration of session management is good. However, consider handling cases where the session or user role might be undefined.

    Add error handling by applying this diff:

    -    const fetcher = (url: string) => securedFetch(url, {
    +    const fetcher = async (url: string) => {
    +        if (!session?.user?.role) {
    +            toast({
    +                title: "Error",
    +                description: "Session data is missing",
    +                variant: "destructive",
    +            });
    +            return [];
    +        }
    +        return securedFetch(url, {
             method: 'GET',
             headers: {
                 'Content-Type': 'application/json'
             }
    -    }, session?.user?.role, toast).then((result) => {
    +    }, session.user.role, toast).then((result) => {
             if (result.ok) {
                 setTime(new Date())
                 return result.json()
             }
             return []
    -    })
    +    })}

    Also applies to: 14-14, 21-21

    Comment on lines +18 to +19
    selectedElementsLength: number,
    displayAdd: boolean
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    💡 Verification agent

    🧩 Analysis chain

    Breaking change: selectedElementsLength is now required.

    The removal of the optional modifier (?) from selectedElementsLength makes it a required prop, which could break existing implementations. Consider keeping it optional for backward compatibility.


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Search for existing usages of the Toolbar component
    ast-grep --pattern 'Toolbar $props'

    Length of output: 37


    Let's gather additional information on how the updated properties are being used throughout the codebase. We need to see if there are existing usages of the <Toolbar /> component that may be affected by the breaking change (i.e., making selectedElementsLength required and adding the new mandatory prop displayAdd).

    I'm generating a new shell script to search for:

    • Usages of the <Toolbar /> component,
    • Occurrences of selectedElementsLength in prop initializations or usage,
    • Occurrences of displayAdd.

    This should help us verify the impact of these changes.


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Search for Toolbar component usages throughout the repository
    rg -n "<Toolbar" || true
    
    # Search for occurrences of 'selectedElementsLength:' in the codebase to check how it is being passed or defined
    rg -n "selectedElementsLength:" || true
    
    # Search for occurrences of 'displayAdd:' to see if it is being used elsewhere and how it's passed
    rg -n "displayAdd:" || true

    Length of output: 308


    Let's gather more context about how <Toolbar /> is being used in the repository to verify if the new required properties (selectedElementsLength and displayAdd) are being provided. This will help us determine the potential impact of this breaking change.


    🏁 Script executed:

    #!/bin/bash
    echo "Checking <Toolbar /> usage in SchemaView.tsx:"
    rg -n -C5 "<Toolbar" app/schema/SchemaView.tsx || true
    
    echo "Checking <Toolbar /> usage in GraphView.tsx:"
    rg -n -C5 "<Toolbar" app/graph/GraphView.tsx || true

    Length of output: 1791

    Breaking Change: <Toolbar /> Usage Missing Required displayAdd Prop

    The recent changes in app/graph/toolbar.tsx update the Props interface by making selectedElementsLength required and introducing a new required property displayAdd. However, both <Toolbar /> usages in app/schema/SchemaView.tsx and app/graph/GraphView.tsx are not providing the new displayAdd prop. This discrepancy will likely cause type errors or runtime issues. Please update these component instances to pass a valid boolean value for displayAdd.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants