-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move component count test to verifier suite & update to 7 components #63
Open
aljones15
wants to merge
7
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
rename-base-proof-check-test
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
aaf757c
Expand test WRT to cbor array in derived proof to include 7 objects.
aljones15 62eb388
Move components test to verify suite.
aljones15 0878df3
Make encodeProofValue stand alone helper.
aljones15 ca57fd4
Create invalid disclosed VC w/ 2 components.
aljones15 2517791
Lint create suite to remove unused assertion.
aljones15 540d89d
Comment generator for small component count.
aljones15 301d109
Update tests/suites/verify.js improve test title for components.
aljones15 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's 4 elements.
Add
1 or 2 byte arrays
, and that's 5 or 6 elements, total.What is the possible 7th element?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@TallTed this is direct from the latest spec here: https://w3c.github.io/vc-di-bbs/#parsederivedproofvalue
I was under the impression that the 7th element was due to changes in related bbs specs WRT to the key, blind signing, and pseudonym signing, but I'm not aware of exactly why this came in. It looks like those changes were made here: w3c/vc-di-bbs#181
@Wind4Greg do you know what the 7th element refers to in this statement? I believe this statement was merged in because the blind and pseudonym specs changed.
It sounds like this might be an issue for the spec itself though and not the test suite.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@TallTed fairly confident the 7th element is: https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs/blob/ad66d386015efc775a0320676381d0af951d6af2/index.html#L679-L686
So related to blind and pseudonym algorithms.
Draft PR here: https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs/pull/188/files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The first paragraph of 3.3.7 parseDerivedProofValue —
— is internally inconsistent (the set may have six, seven, or eight elements) and it disagrees with the last paragraph of that algorithm (again, should say "six, seven, or eight elements" including "featureOption", "pseudonym" and/or "lengthBBSMessages") —
These should be brought into agreement. Whatever the result is, it should then be applied to this part of the test suite.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Moved to #64 which will probably move to the https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs/ repo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#64 is untouched. The enumeration of the elements (
a byte array, a map of integers to integers, two arrays of integers, and one or two byte arrays
) here does not agree with the possible counts indicated (five, six, or seven elements
). The enumeration only leads tofive or six elements
; there is no indication of a possible seventh.