Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Percent-decode each path fragment. #51
Percent-decode each path fragment. #51
Changes from 1 commit
280e17e
d696efb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wonder if we can keep the port part, and scratch the rest of this...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fwiw, the spec already mentions ports ("A port MAY be included and the colon MUST be percent encoded to prevent a conflict with paths.") So this PR is mainly about the path part.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest removing this change suggestion (move to an issue / tackle in a subsequent pr).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the main point of the PR tho..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't percent-decoding each path part mean that percent-encoded non-URL-safe characters in the DID would end up not being representable in the HTTPS URL (because they need to be percent-encoded)? These would then have to be double-percent-encoded in the DID.
e.g.
did:example:example.org:dir:space%20bar
→https://example.org/dir/space bar.json
did:example:example.org:dir:space%25%20bar
→https://example.org/dir/space%20bar.json
while I would think the desired case would be:
did:example:example.org:dir:space%20bar
→https://example.org/dir/space%20bar.json
Would it make more sense to just say percent-decode the colon character in each path part, similar to how that is done for the domain part in the previous step? i.e. replace occurrences of
%3A
with:
in each path part.Maybe saying "path part" instead of "path fragment" could be more clear, so that the term fragment could be used more consistently?