Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat[venom]: function inliner #4266

Closed

Conversation

charles-cooper
Copy link
Member

@charles-cooper charles-cooper commented Sep 30, 2024

What I did

depends #4039

also depends on #4341, otherwise there is a performance regression (due to the promotion of the callee buffer to alloca'ed locations)

How I did it

How to verify it

Commit message

Commit message for the final, squashed PR. (Optional, but reviewers will appreciate it! Please see our commit message style guide for what we would ideally like to see in a commit message.)

Description for the changelog

Cute Animal Picture

Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->

return ret

@property
def _threshold(self):

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Explicit returns mixed with implicit (fall through) returns Note

Mixing implicit and explicit returns may indicate an error as implicit returns always return None.
if inst.opcode == "param":
inst.opcode = "store"
inst.operands = [invoke_inst.operands[-i - 1]]
last_param = inst

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Variable defined multiple times Warning

This assignment to 'last_param' is unnecessary as it is
redefined
before this value is used.
some passes implicitly depend on basic blocks being in cfg traversal
order (or at least, basic blocks to be preceded by their dominators)
@@ -131,10 +145,12 @@

for _ in range(fn.num_basic_blocks): # essentially `while True`
self._collapse_chained_blocks(entry)
self.analyses_cache.force_analysis(CFGAnalysis)
cfg = self.analyses_cache.force_analysis(CFGAnalysis)

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Unused local variable Note

Variable cfg is not used.
@charles-cooper
Copy link
Member Author

superseded by #4468

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants