Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

documentation for amko true multitenancy #263

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arihantg
Copy link
Contributor

@arihantg arihantg commented Jan 1, 2025

No description provided.

@@ -1,25 +1,59 @@
# Tenancy support in AMKO

This feature allows AMKO to create GSLB object in a user-specified tenant in Avi.The expected isolation and administrative restrictions of a multi-tenant architecture in NSX Advanced Load Balancer GSLB extend to AMKO
This feature allows AMKO to create GSLB objects in user-specified tenants in Avi.The expected isolation and administrative restrictions of a multi-tenant architecture in NSX Advanced Load Balancer GSLB extend to AMKO
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NSX Advanced Load Balancer to Avi Load Balancer


**Note:** In case of tenant update in namespace for already created GSLB objects AMKO will create GSLB objects in new tenant only after tenant is updated in namespaces across all member clusters.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In case of tenant update in namespace for already created GSLB objects, AMKO will create GSLB objects in new tenant only after tenant is updated in namespaces across all member clusters.

"type": "WRITE_ACCESS"
},
{
"resource": "PERMISSION_VRFCONTEXT",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why does AMKO admin require write access to vrf context?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should not. Will test with minimal access and update

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants