-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
documentation for amko true multitenancy #263
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -1,25 +1,59 @@ | |||
# Tenancy support in AMKO | |||
|
|||
This feature allows AMKO to create GSLB object in a user-specified tenant in Avi.The expected isolation and administrative restrictions of a multi-tenant architecture in NSX Advanced Load Balancer GSLB extend to AMKO | |||
This feature allows AMKO to create GSLB objects in user-specified tenants in Avi.The expected isolation and administrative restrictions of a multi-tenant architecture in NSX Advanced Load Balancer GSLB extend to AMKO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NSX Advanced Load Balancer to Avi Load Balancer
|
||
**Note:** In case of tenant update in namespace for already created GSLB objects AMKO will create GSLB objects in new tenant only after tenant is updated in namespaces across all member clusters. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In case of tenant update in namespace for already created GSLB objects, AMKO will create GSLB objects in new tenant only after tenant is updated in namespaces across all member clusters.
"type": "WRITE_ACCESS" | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
"resource": "PERMISSION_VRFCONTEXT", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why does AMKO admin require write access to vrf context?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should not. Will test with minimal access and update
No description provided.