Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Documentation]: Refactor for easier readability #343

Open
1 of 2 tasks
jacobhq opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #394
Open
1 of 2 tasks

[Documentation]: Refactor for easier readability #343

jacobhq opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #394
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@jacobhq
Copy link
Contributor

jacobhq commented Jan 14, 2025

As per #335 (comment), implement:

@marcalexiei marcalexiei added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 14, 2025
@marcalexiei marcalexiei moved this to Ready in Road to V1 Jan 14, 2025
@Valerioageno
Copy link
Member

Just a quick note: I think that the Table of content should be implemented with server side rendering! This will make a little bit more complex the implementation but better the user experience

@marcalexiei
Copy link
Member

Also, IMHO the two task should be implemented with two separate pull requests.

@jacobhq
Copy link
Contributor Author

jacobhq commented Jan 15, 2025

Ok good plan!

@jacobhq
Copy link
Contributor Author

jacobhq commented Jan 20, 2025

For the table of contents - there is a component there for it - should I use it as a starting point?

@Valerioageno
Copy link
Member

Yeah, It could be a good starting point!

@jacobhq jacobhq linked a pull request Jan 21, 2025 that will close this issue
3 tasks
@Valerioageno Valerioageno moved this from In progress to In review in Road to V1 Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
Status: In review
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants