Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

client bugfix: check the existing buffer before attempting to read from the transport #456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

jbr
Copy link
Contributor

@jbr jbr commented Dec 19, 2023

this resolves the lingering intermittent test timeout

client/src/conn.rs Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
@jbr jbr force-pushed the client-bugfix-do-not-read-before-checking-buffer branch 2 times, most recently from be14ce6 to 0a27bb4 Compare December 19, 2023 22:48
@jbr jbr force-pushed the client-bugfix-do-not-read-before-checking-buffer branch from 0a27bb4 to 3b2f82a Compare December 19, 2023 22:50
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (ea52e21) 48.05% compared to head (8347c02) 48.08%.

❗ Current head 8347c02 differs from pull request most recent head 3b2f82a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3b2f82a to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #456      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   48.05%   48.08%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         169      169              
  Lines        6569     6572       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         3157     3160       +3     
  Misses       3412     3412              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jbr jbr merged commit f1dfc4e into main Dec 19, 2023
19 checks passed
@jbr jbr deleted the client-bugfix-do-not-read-before-checking-buffer branch December 19, 2023 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant