Improve Anchor Grype vulnerability scanning efficiency #99
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@svengo has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 58 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to two GitHub Actions workflow files. The Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/cleanup-cache.yml (1)
5-7: LGTM! Good addition of scheduled cleanup.Adding a daily scheduled trigger is a good practice for automated cache maintenance.
Remove trailing spaces from line 7:
- - cron: '0 0 * * *' # Daily at 0 AM UTC + - cron: '0 0 * * *' # Daily at 0 AM UTC🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 7-7: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/anchore.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/cleanup-cache.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/cleanup-cache.yml
[error] 7-7: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/anchore.yml (5)
36-40: LGTM! Good addition of multi-platform build support.
Setting up QEMU and Docker Buildx enables multi-platform builds, which is a good practice for container image compatibility.
62-70: Good practice using local image tar for scanning.
Using a local tar file for scanning is a secure approach as it:
- Ensures scanning the exact build output
- Works without registry authentication
- Reduces network dependencies
72-75: LGTM! Proper SARIF report handling.
The vulnerability report upload is correctly configured with the latest CodeQL action version.
41-47: Consider enabling GHCR authentication.
The commented-out GitHub Container Registry authentication could be useful for:
- Avoiding rate limits
- Enabling image pushing in the future
- Accessing private base images
Let's check if any private base images are used:
49-60: Verify cache configuration and platform support.
The build configuration looks good with proper caching and platform specification. However:
- Consider adding more platforms (e.g., arm64) if needed
- Verify if the cache settings are optimal for your build frequency
Let's check the repository's workflow run frequency to validate cache settings:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the Dockerfile to better understand the build requirements and platform needs before making the final recommendation.
Current cache and platform configuration is optimal
Based on the workflow run frequency (averaging 6-10 runs per active day) and the Dockerfile analysis:
- The current GHA cache configuration is appropriate for this build frequency
- Single platform (linux/amd64) is sufficient as the image uses Alpine base with no platform-specific dependencies
- The build process involves compiling Tor from source which is well-tested on x86_64/amd64
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check workflow run frequency for the past month
gh run list --workflow=anchore.yml --limit 100 --json startedAt | \
jq -r '.[].startedAt' | \
awk '{print substr($1,1,10)}' | \
sort | \
uniq -c
Length of output: 290
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Dockerfile contents
cat Dockerfile
# Also check if there are any platform-specific dependencies or base images in other Dockerfiles
fd Dockerfile --exec cat {}
Length of output: 3866
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/anchore.yml (2)
35-40: LGTM: Proper setup for multi-platform buildsThe QEMU and Docker Buildx setup steps are correctly configured and positioned. This setup enables multi-platform builds, which is a good practice for container images.
Consider adding more platforms in the build step (like linux/arm64) to support a wider range of architectures, especially if this image might be used on ARM-based systems.
52-60: LGTM: Proper configuration of Grype scanThe vulnerability scanning step is well-configured with appropriate failure conditions and severity cutoff.
Consider adding a comment explaining the severity-cutoff choice to help future maintainers understand the security policy decision:
image: /tmp/testimage.tar fail-build: true + # Fail the build for high and critical vulnerabilities severity-cutoff: high
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/anchore.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/anchore.yml (3)
32-34: LGTM: Using latest version of checkout action
The checkout step is properly configured and uses the latest stable version of the action.
61-64: LGTM: Proper SARIF report upload configuration
The report upload step is correctly configured to use the scan output and uses the latest stable version of the action.
41-51: Verify platform requirements for the Docker image
The build configuration looks good with proper caching and output handling. However, the build is limited to linux/amd64 platform.
Let's check if there are any architecture-specific dependencies that might prevent multi-platform builds:
svengo
changed the title
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes