-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 620
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: improve examples of stats/base/dists/kumaraswamy
#2605
Conversation
hey @kgryte can you please review this !!!!!!!!!!!! |
I wanted to check if there are any issues affecting the merge of my pull request. If so, please let me know, and I'll be happy to make any necessary updates. @kgryte |
@kgryte waiting for your reply !!! |
@kgryte can you please review !!! |
@kgryte waiting !! |
stats/base/dists/kumaraswamy
hey @Planeshifter can you please review this !! its being a long time waiting for your reply ! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Made some small edits and will merge shortly.
Just for future reference, one of the reasons I didn't review this PR earlier was that the new examples contained a call to a random
function that doesn't exist in our stats/base/dists
namespaces, which you would have noticed if even running the example code a single time.
Reviewing PRs takes work, and you can expect quicker feedback when showing that you did the necessary work to ensure your PR is of high-quality.
But either way, thanks for your contribution, which I will merge shortly.
PR Commit Message
Please review the above commit message and make any necessary adjustments. |
Resolves #1632
Description
This pull request:
Related Issues
This pull request:
stats/base/dists/kumaraswamy
namespace #1632stats/base/dists/kumaraswamy
namespace #1632Questions
No.
Other
No.
Checklist
@stdlib-js/reviewers