Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(find_longtime_files): add new tool for analyzing log file proces… #10

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

sangshuduo
Copy link
Owner

…sing times

  • Implemented a new tool to analyze log files and extract processing durations.
  • Added progress bar to enhance user feedback during file processing.
  • Included functions to remove ANSI codes and extract timestamps and filenames.
  • Utilized chrono, regex, and indicatif dependencies for functionality.

…sing times

- Implemented a new tool to analyze log files and extract processing durations.
- Added progress bar to enhance user feedback during file processing.
- Included functions to remove ANSI codes and extract timestamps and filenames.
- Utilized `chrono`, `regex`, and `indicatif` dependencies for functionality.
Copy link
Contributor

mentatbot bot commented Feb 19, 2025

I'm getting to work. See my steps and track my cost here.

  • Wake on any new activity.
    I always see new activity while actively working. When paused, I'll only respond when tagged unless this box is checked.

Copy link
Contributor

@mentatbot mentatbot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request is well-implemented and adds useful functionality. With some minor improvements in documentation and error handling, it will be ready to merge. The code is clean and follows good practices. I've provided specific suggestions for enhancement, but none are blocking issues.

Copy link
Contributor

mentatbot bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Thank you for this contribution! I've reviewed the new find_longtime_files tool and have some feedback.

Overall, the implementation is well-structured and uses appropriate crates for the functionality. Here are my observations and suggestions for improvement:

Positive Aspects

  • Good use of progress bar for user feedback
  • Efficient file processing with BufReader
  • Clear separation of concerns with helper functions
  • Appropriate use of dependencies (chrono, regex, indicatif)
  • Good error handling for file operations

Suggestions for Improvement

  1. Documentation:

    • Consider adding documentation comments (///) for the main function
    • Add a brief description in the package's Cargo.toml about what the tool does
    • Consider adding a README.md for this specific tool
  2. Error Handling:

    • Consider using anyhow or thiserror for more ergonomic error handling
    • Add more specific error messages for parsing failures
  3. Code Structure:

    • Consider moving the helper functions into a separate module
    • The timestamp format could be defined as a constant
  4. Features:

    • Consider adding an optional minimum duration threshold parameter
    • Consider adding an output format option (e.g., JSON, CSV)

Would you like me to help implement any of these suggestions?

- Add `clap` for command-line argument parsing.
- Add `anyhow` for better error handling.
- Refactor main function to improve readability and error context.
- Ensure proper extraction and parsing of timestamps in log files.
@sangshuduo sangshuduo merged commit 15d7bb5 into main Feb 19, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant