Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade 'sass' to 1.85.1, silence new deprecation warnings #630

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bradenmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor

This upgrades sass and silences the many deprecation warnings that result.

Without this, MFEs may bump the sass version anyways, and then they'll see this ugliness when starting the dev server:

Screenshot 2025-02-28 at 3 25 15 PM

@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @bradenmacdonald!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/committers-frontend-build.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.
🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads
🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.


Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Feb 28, 2025
@bradenmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor Author

@adamstankiewicz @brian-smith-tcril could I please get a review of this from one of you?

@bradenmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @adamstankiewicz ! I thought your review would turn this green - is there a permissions issue here or do I need another reviewer?

@@ -100,8 +100,9 @@ module.exports = merge(commonConfig, {
path.join(process.cwd(), 'node_modules'),
path.join(process.cwd(), 'src'),
],
// silences compiler warnings regarding deprecation warnings
// Silences compiler deprecation warnings. They mostly come from bootstrap and/or paragon.
quietDeps: true,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Out of curiosity, do you happen to know why the quietDeps: true doesn't seem to handle the silencing of deprecations on its own?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't. I probably should have investigated more; my hunch is that the quietDeps parameter was replaced with the more fine-grained silenceDeprecations option at some point. But I left it there since I wasn't sure if it's silencing some other warnings or not.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, OK that was wrong. Per https://sass-lang.com/documentation/js-api/interfaces/options/#quietDeps quietDeps means "If this option is set to true, Sass won’t print warnings that are caused by dependencies." - but we're still seeing warnings here from imports of paragon and bootstrap CSS which technically isn't a dependency. Maybe I should look a bit closer and see if it's actually something fixable.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@bradenmacdonald bradenmacdonald Feb 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh yeah, I did try to run npx sass-migrator module src/**/*.scss in the Learning MFE, but it says that it can't migrate the imports without modifying dependency files like node_modules/bootstrap/scss/_functions.scss . So that's why I decided to just silence them for now.

@adamstankiewicz
Copy link
Member

Thanks @adamstankiewicz ! I thought your review would turn this green - is there a permissions issue here or do I need another reviewer?

I unfortunately lost write permissions on most of the frontend repositories recently, due to some permissions and core contributor changes between 2U/Axim. Hope to get it back soon enough.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
Status: Needs Triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants