Consider more nodes as ttPv nodes.

[locutus2]

Remove depth condition in propagation rule for ttPv state from a node to
it childs.

Because this change marks more nodes as ttPv, we have a time sensitive
ttPv reduction rule and the STC snd LTC seems to show bad scaling. So i
have also submitted a VLTC non-regression to check the scaling at higher
time control.

The results gives a little indication that we have perhaps good scaling
with more ttPv nodes so that could be further explored.

Passed non-regression STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 82528 W: 21627 L: 21453 D: 39448
Ptnml(0-2): 317, 9809, 20891, 9877, 370
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/678e608cd63764e34db49ad7

Passed non-regression LTC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 310440 W: 78879 L: 78956 D: 152605
Ptnml(0-2): 255, 34915, 84938, 34876, 236
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/678fab89ac8f8f5496155f3c

Passed non-regression VLTC for scaling verification:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 59496 W: 15158 L: 14983 D: 29355
Ptnml(0-2): 15, 6039, 17470, 6204, 20
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6794bd1f4f7de645171fb33b

Bench: 1498882

[github-actions]

clang-format 18 needs to be run on this PR.
If you do not have clang-format installed, the maintainer will run it when merging.
For the exact version please see https://packages.ubuntu.com/noble/clang-format-18.

(execution 12966045048 / attempt 1)

[locutus2]

Because this marks more nodes as ttPV and the tests scaled not good i will check a non-regression at VLTC to check if it effect the ttPv reductione rule which was effects especially long TCs.

EDIT:
here is the VLTC test https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6794bd1f4f7de645171fb33b

[locutus2]

The VLTC passed fast (less then 60K games which was the fastet from the three tests). So we have no issue. Perhaps we have even a good scaling for increasing ttPv nodes.