-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Renaming channels #436
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Renaming channels #436
Conversation
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I approved this PR. just have a few general comments/clarifying questions:
-
Based on the paper, the implementation of each channel is specific to the interconnect. For example, the PortChannel uses the DMA-copy data transfer mode over NVLink, xGMI, PCIe, and Infiniband." Does it mean we have different implementations for PortChannel to support each interconnect (NVLink, xGMI, PCIe, and Infiniband)? same question for MemoryChannel
-
Since this PR is changing many files, we need to make sure all mscclpp tests as well as nccl-tests/rccl-tests are passing before the merge
-
Once the paper is out, we can add a link to it in the repo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, maybe we can merge mscclpp-lang related PR first. Then hold-on other PR requests and merge this PR.
No description provided.