Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Committee Conflict of Interest resolution #7468
Committee Conflict of Interest resolution #7468
Changes from 11 commits
c4715a4
02173e6
31d12a7
d339722
bef9e09
211ec62
8707f29
5c4823d
f81d8da
25ef6e6
2c42bb1
485758f
c36f60d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this sentiment, but I see a problem with the number 12 months, specifically in how the current elections are lined up. If the elections were staggered by 6 months, this would be completely reasonable, but if the elections are close together, as they are right now, and they happen at about the same time every year, this places an unbalanced restriction on the committee that has its elections first. Whatever the candidates reasons might be for wanting to change committees in the first place (for example: wanting more/less emotional labor), I would suggest this number change to slightly less (10 or 11 months), to not be such a unidirectional disadvantage. This would also avoid even the perception of any possible artificial forcing function pushing back the annual cycle of elections.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I'm thinking about this, we could also say slightly longer (14 months), and still avoid the imbalance when elections are close on the calendar.