Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: upgrade to Jenkins LTS Core 2.462.3 for Java 11 support #242

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gounthar
Copy link

Hello appscan developers! 👋

This is an automated pull request created by the Jenkins Plugin Modernizer tool. The tool has applied the following recipes to modernize the plugin:

Upgrade to latest LTS core version supporting Java 11

io.jenkins.tools.pluginmodernizer.UpgradeToLatestJava11CoreVersion

Upgrade to latest LTS core version supporting Java 11.

Why is this important?

Transitional Step to Java 17

Upgrading to Jenkins LTS Core 2.462.3 is a critical step in our roadmap towards leveraging Java 17. This transition serves as an intermediary phase, ensuring that all systems are optimized for Java 11 before making the leap to Java 17.

Enhancements and Security

By moving to this LTS version, we benefit from the latest performance and security improvements foundational to Java 11. Ensuring our dependencies are up-to-date and secure prepares the groundwork for a smoother transition to Java 17.

Long-Term Support

The LTS version provides the necessary support and stability for Java 11, offering assurance during our gradual migration process. This allows us to take advantage of long-term updates and critical patches.

Embracing these incremental changes aligns our development environment with current standards and strategically positions us for future advancement. We appreciate your feedback and testing as we aim for a seamless adjustment period.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant