Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add data max size and emit deposit hook events #133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

beer-1
Copy link
Member

@beer-1 beer-1 commented Jan 24, 2025

Description

add MsgInitiateTokenDeposit msg size checker and emit deposit hook events.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced event handling during token deposit and withdrawal processes
    • Added data length validation for token deposit messages
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved event emission during message handling
  • Improvements

    • Introduced a new constant to limit data length in token deposit messages
    • Added a new error type for invalid data scenarios

The updates focus on improving system reliability and data validation in the token deposit and withdrawal workflows.

@beer-1 beer-1 self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
@beer-1 beer-1 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2025 04:22
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces modifications across multiple files in the x/opchild and x/ophost modules. The changes primarily focus on enhancing event handling for token deposits, adding a new test for deposit hook events, and implementing data validation for token deposit messages. The modifications include updating the message handling to capture and emit events, creating a new test to verify event emission, adding a new error type, and introducing a data length constraint for token deposit messages.

Changes

File Change Summary
x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go Updated handleBridgeHook to capture handler result and emit events
x/opchild/keeper/deposit_test.go Added new test Test_MsgServer_Deposit_HookEvents to validate deposit event handling
x/ophost/types/error.go Introduced new error variable ErrInvalidData
x/ophost/types/tx.go Added MaxDataLength constant and implemented length validation for MsgInitiateTokenDeposit

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant MsgServer
    participant Handler
    participant EventManager
    participant CacheContext

    MsgServer->>Handler: Execute message
    Handler-->>MsgServer: Return result with events
    MsgServer->>CacheContext: Capture context
    CacheContext->>EventManager: Emit events from handler result
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sh-cha

Poem

🐰 Hops of Code, Events Take Flight

Deposits dance with data so bright
Hooks emit signals, validation tight
A rabbit's code leaps with pure delight
Bridging worlds with technical might! 🌉

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 49.38%. Comparing base (bb31a38) to head (5c1c229).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
x/ophost/types/tx.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #133      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   49.40%   49.38%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        4271     4275       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         2110     2111       +1     
- Misses       1723     1726       +3     
  Partials      438      438              
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go 68.75% <100.00%> (+0.39%) ⬆️
x/ophost/types/tx.go 10.37% <0.00%> (-0.14%) ⬇️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
x/opchild/keeper/deposit_test.go (1)

1-65: Add negative test scenarios for invalid data

Currently, no test ensures FinalizeTokenDeposit fails due to an excessively large Data payload. Adding a negative test scenario that triggers ErrInvalidData will help confirm that the system correctly rejects deposits exceeding the maximum data length.

Would you like help drafting or extending your test coverage for oversize data inputs?

x/ophost/types/tx.go (1)

25-25: Consider making MaxDataLength configurable

A hard-coded limit of 10KB may be acceptable for now, but if you anticipate changing it in the future, it might be beneficial to store this value in module parameters to simplify future adjustments.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb31a38 and 5c1c229.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go (1 hunks)
  • x/opchild/keeper/deposit_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/ophost/types/error.go (1 hunks)
  • x/ophost/types/tx.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/ophost/types/tx.go

[warning] 199-201: x/ophost/types/tx.go#L199-L201
Added lines #L199 - L201 were not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (3)
x/ophost/types/error.go (1)

25-25: Thanks for introducing a new error code

No immediate issues observed. The code addition aligns with the module’s error handling pattern.

x/ophost/types/tx.go (1)

199-201: Add coverage for the invalid data condition

The static analysis (codecov) indicates that these lines are untested. Ensure you create tests that provide a msg.Data array exceeding MaxDataLength, confirming that ErrInvalidData is correctly triggered.

Let me know if you’d like a helper script or a code snippet to integrate such a test.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 199-201: x/ophost/types/tx.go#L199-L201
Added lines #L199 - L201 were not covered by tests

x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go (1)

61-68: Event emission is correctly handled

Capturing the res and emitting its events is an excellent enhancement, ensuring deposit-related actions are properly tracked.

Copy link
Contributor

@sh-cha sh-cha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@beer-1 beer-1 merged commit 5302ad2 into main Jan 28, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@beer-1 beer-1 deleted the fix/audit branch January 28, 2025 05:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants