Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Refactor compare-ver common custom command #126

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

hustcer
Copy link
Owner

@hustcer hustcer commented Feb 2, 2025

refactor: Refactor compare-ver common custom command

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the version comparison process to deliver more accurate and predictable version ordering. Version strings are now parsed systematically, with missing segments handled uniformly and pre-release indicators managed more effectively. This update enhances reliability wherever version evaluations are required.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the compare-ver function in the nu/common.nu file. The function’s parameter names have been changed from from and to to v1 and v2. The internal logic is rewritten to employ a new helper function, parse-ver, which standardizes version string parsing by removing pre-release and build details and converting the main part into a list of integers. The comparison now iterates over the first three segments of the parsed versions, using zeros for missing segments, and returns 1, 0, or -1 based on the evaluation.

Changes

File Change Summary
nu/common.nu Updated the compare-ver function signature (parameters renamed from from/to to v1/v2). Rewritten internal logic to use the new helper function parse-ver for version string parsing and simplified version segment comparisons.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Caller
    participant CV as compare-ver
    participant PV as parse-ver

    C->>CV: Call compare-ver(v1, v2)
    CV->>PV: Parse v1 string
    PV-->>CV: Return [int,...] for v1
    CV->>PV: Parse v2 string
    PV-->>CV: Return [int,...] for v2
    CV->>CV: Compare version segments (pad missing with 0)
    CV-->>C: Return comparison result (1, 0, -1)
Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit hopping through the code,
Digging in versions where secrets are stowed.
From v1 to v2, a change so neat,
Parsing and comparing with a rhythmic beat.
Carrots and code, a joyful mix indeed!
~ Hop along and let the changes lead!


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2025

Code Review Analysis

Issues Identified:

  1. Redundant Code Removal: The original code had redundant logic for parsing version numbers, which has been simplified in the new version. This is a positive change.
  2. Hardcoded Version Parts: The new code hardcodes the comparison to only the first three parts of the version (major, minor, patch). This might not be sufficient for all versioning schemes, especially those with more than three parts.
  3. Lack of Documentation: The new code lacks comments explaining the purpose of the parse-ver function and the logic behind the comparison loop.
  4. Potential Edge Cases: The new code does not handle edge cases such as:
    • Versions with more than three parts.
    • Versions with non-numeric parts (e.g., 1.2.3-beta).
    • Versions with leading zeros (e.g., 1.02.3).

Recommendations:

  1. Extend Version Comparison: Modify the loop to dynamically handle versions with more than three parts. For example:

    for i in 0..([($a | length) ($b | length)] | math max) {

    This will ensure that all parts of the version are compared, not just the first three.

  2. Add Documentation: Add comments to explain the purpose of the parse-ver function and the logic behind the comparison loop. This will make the code more maintainable.

  3. Handle Edge Cases: Consider adding logic to handle edge cases such as:

    • Non-numeric parts in the version string.
    • Leading zeros in version numbers.
    • Pre-release and build metadata (e.g., 1.2.3-beta).
  4. Code Formatting: Ensure consistent code formatting, especially around the return statements. For example:

    if $x > $y { return 1 }
    if $x < $y { return -1 }

    This improves readability.

Example Improved Code:

export def compare-ver [v1: string, v2: string] {
  # Parse the version number: remove pre-release and build information,
  # only take the main version part, and convert it to a list of numbers
  def parse-ver [v: string] {
    $v | str downcase | str trim -c v | str trim
       | split row - | first | split row . | each { into int }
  }

  let a = parse-ver $v1
  let b = parse-ver $v2

  # Compare the major, minor, patch, and any additional parts
  # Fill in the missing parts with 0
  for i in 0..([($a | length) ($b | length)] | math max) {
    let x = $a | get -i $i | default 0
    let y = $b | get -i $i | default 0
    if $x > $y { return 1 }
    if $x < $y { return -1 }
  }

  # If all parts are equal, return 0
  0
}

This improved version addresses the identified issues and provides a more robust solution for version comparison.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
nu/common.nu (1)

34-53: LGTM! The refactoring improves modularity and readability.

The new implementation is more maintainable with a separate parse-ver helper function and handles version comparison effectively.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Add documentation about expected version format and examples:
 # Compare two version number, return `1` if first one is higher than second one,
 # Return `0` if they are equal, otherwise return `-1`
+# Examples:
+#   compare-ver "1.2.3" "1.2.0"    # Returns 1
+#   compare-ver "2.0.0" "2.0.0"    # Returns 0
+#   compare-ver "1.9.9" "2.0.0"    # Returns -1
+# Format: Expects semantic version strings (major.minor.patch)
+#   - Optional 'v' prefix
+#   - Pre-release suffixes (-beta, -rc, etc.) are ignored
+#   - Missing segments default to 0
  1. Add input validation for malformed versions:
 def parse-ver [v: string] {
+  # Validate version format
+  let is_valid = ($v | str downcase | str trim -c v | str trim
+                    | parse --regex '^(\d+\.)*\d+(-.*)?$'
+                    | length) > 0
+  if (not $is_valid) {
+    error make {msg: $"Invalid version format: ($v)"}
+  }
   $v | str downcase | str trim -c v | str trim
      | split row - | first | split row . | each { into int }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae091c1 and 0cf55ef.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • nu/common.nu (1 hunks)

@hustcer hustcer merged commit 82f8792 into main Feb 2, 2025
106 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.18.0 milestone Feb 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant