Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(jobs): optimize code structure from previous merge #1356

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 2, 2025

Conversation

Daggahh
Copy link
Contributor

@Daggahh Daggahh commented Mar 2, 2025

Authorization Improvements for Job Management System

Changes

  • Implemented fine-grained authorization for super admin access to job updates
  • Bolstered test coverage for complex authorization scenarios
  • Rectified critical authorization logic flaws in JobAccessGuard
  • Ensured proper permission hierarchy between job owners and super admins

What type of PR is this?

  • Bug Fix
  • Enhancement

Test Coverage

Added comprehensive tests for:

  • Super admin ability to update any job regardless of ownership
  • Regular user restrictions to only owned jobs
  • Permission verification across various authorization edge cases
  • Data integrity validation during permission-sensitive operations

Related Issues

Closes #1257

Testing Instructions

npm run test src/modules/jobs/tests/jobs.service.spec.ts

Screenshots

Screenshot 2025-03-02 104757

Additional Notes

This PR extends the previous job update functionality to properly handle super admin permissions while maintaining existing job owner access.

Daggahh added 2 commits March 2, 2025 10:24
- Add super admin authorization to job updates
- Add unit tests for super admin and regular user scenarios
- Fix authorization logic in JobAccessGuard
- Maintain backward compatibility for job owners
- Update test coverage for edge cases

Related: hngprojects#1257
@Homoakin619 Homoakin619 merged commit e734e8d into hngprojects:dev Mar 2, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants