website/integrations: Update to Wizard and Styling Guide

[nicedevil007]

Used new knowledge on how to better contribute to update my "old" OAuth Docs.
Ty @dominic-r

---

Checklist

• Local tests pass (ak test authentik/)
• The code has been formatted (make lint-fix)

If an API change has been made

• The API schema has been updated (make gen-build)

If changes to the frontend have been made

• The code has been formatted (make web)

If applicable

• The documentation has been updated
• The documentation has been formatted (make website)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for authentik-storybook canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	826716c
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/authentik-storybook/deploys/679f9727f09d6600084bbace

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for authentik-docs ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	826716c
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/authentik-docs/deploys/679f9727d8cfff000903a8fd
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-12919--authentik-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.72%. Comparing base (7686d12) to head (826716c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #12919   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.72%   92.72%           
=======================================
  Files         770      770           
  Lines       38945    38945           
=======================================
  Hits        36113    36113           
  Misses       2832     2832           

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	48.54% <ø> (ø)
integration	24.59% <ø> (ø)
unit	90.37% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dominic-r]

Hi, thank you for your contribution! Unfortunately, some of the changes in this PR will have to be superseded by this PR due to the nature/quantity of the changes. #12716 and merging as-is would cause unnecessary merge conflicts.

Please do let me know when the duplicate part(s) are removed and i'd be happy to take a look at this

[nicedevil007]

Guess actual budget was the only one that was in the PR mentioned. So I took a look at the other changes on the PR you linked here. As I go over my old PRs files I found the setting:

Select implicit or explicit authorization flow as desired.

Should this not be in all PRs that reference the Wizard to create the SP/App.

And yes I know: Would be a story for an other day :) I guess the maingoal of all you nice guys here that are responsible for documentation want to change all guides to the Wizard at anytime.

[dominic-r]

Actually, it's not just changing all to use the wizard, naming all throughout the docs also needs to get updated as the word "wizard" will no longer appear in the UI. As for the setting you found, I do believe the following sentence from the new template includes this:
provide a name (or accept the auto-provided name), the authorization flow to use for this provider, and the following required configurations.

[nicedevil007]

Actually, it's not just changing all to use the wizard, naming all throughout the docs also needs to get updated as the word "wizard" will no longer appear in the UI. As for the setting you found, I do believe the following sentence from the new template includes this: provide a name (or accept the auto-provided name), the authorization flow to use for this provider, and the following required configurations.

ok :) so this PR is there anything I should do right now?