Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add gzip pool to reuse the reader #950

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

feat: add gzip pool to reuse the reader #950

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

jeevatkm
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jeevatkm jeevatkm added enhancement v3 For resty v3 labels Jan 14, 2025
@jeevatkm jeevatkm added this to the v3.0.0 Milestone milestone Jan 14, 2025
@jeevatkm jeevatkm self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.81%. Comparing base (1ce39e1) to head (5ab2457).
Report is 2 commits behind head on v3.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##               v3     #950   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.81%   99.81%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        3832     3832           
=======================================
  Hits         3825     3825           
  Misses          5        5           
  Partials        2        2           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.81% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jeevatkm jeevatkm merged commit 5823c50 into v3 Jan 14, 2025
6 checks passed
@jeevatkm jeevatkm deleted the add-gzip-pool branch January 14, 2025 07:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement v3 For resty v3
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant