Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add workflow overview #19

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ThoFrank
Copy link
Contributor

@ThoFrank ThoFrank commented Nov 12, 2024

Visualization of our GH action strategy.

depends on:
#18 ✅ to prepare for code coverage and doxygen
#12 ✅ for Code coverage
#20 ✅ for doxygen

Signed-off-by: Thomas Frank <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Frank <[email protected]>
@ThoFrank ThoFrank marked this pull request as ready for review November 26, 2024 16:00
@ThoFrank
Copy link
Contributor Author

ThoFrank commented Nov 26, 2024

Also added the trigger conditions for the merge queue. I am currently trying to find out how to reference the individual checks in otterdog.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Frank <[email protected]>
@netomi
Copy link

netomi commented Nov 27, 2024

We tried to capture the rules how GitHub references jobs to status checks here: https://otterdog.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/organization/repository/status-check/

@ThoFrank
Copy link
Contributor Author

I looked at that page already. Probably it's a good idea to just use unique names for all jobs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants