Adding Legacy Wood procedural #1412
Conversation
Adding Legacy Wood procedural and 2 utility graphs - legacy_wood - util_woodfactor - util_woodnoise Fixing a node category in Waves that was left unchanged after export.
| @@ -182,6 +182,41 @@ | |||
| <output name="out" type="color3" /> | |||
| </nodedef> | |||
|
|
|||
| <nodedef name="ND_util_woodnoise_float" node="util_woodnoise"> | |||
| <input name="x" type="float" uisoftmin="0.0" uisoftmax="1.0" /> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we rename this input from x to something that would be clear. I think it's used mainly as a factor?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I considered that yesterday. It's technically a distance. Then I stuck to the function parameter name.
I believe this is a worthy change. Let me do it.
| <input name="color1" type="color3" value="0.603, 0.445, 0.072" uisoftmin="0,0,0" uisoftmax="1,1,1" /> | ||
| <input name="color2" type="color3" value="0.212, 0.072, 0" uisoftmin="0,0,0" uisoftmax="1,1,1" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggest giving a better name primary grain color and secondary grain color etc?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So far I always matched the Protein names for all my classes. This would be an exception if we do it. See the current UI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess skip for now. I don't think eventually we will need to propagate legacy names. We could publish new names and document them.
Simple rename of the "util_woodnoise" input "x" to "distance" The input order where util_woodnoise is used has changed. That's LookdevX decision (maybe the order the input are connected?). Makes the diff look more different than what it actually is.
Adding Legacy Wood procedural and 2 utility graphs
Fixing a node category in Waves that was left unchanged after export.