Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert Revert LargeCommitTest #33745

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

Revert Revert LargeCommitTest #33745

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

Abacn
Copy link
Contributor

@Abacn Abacn commented Jan 23, 2025

Reverts #33597

The added test is permared

@Abacn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Abacn commented Jan 23, 2025

R: @Amar3tto @arunpandianp

cc: @scwhittle

@arunpandianp
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for the trouble. The test is running into user worker memory limits. We can revert the test, but not the fix.

Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

@Abacn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Abacn commented Jan 23, 2025

@arunpandianp thanks for prompt reply, done

@arunpandianp
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, LGTM

@arunpandianp
Copy link
Contributor

Can we update the PR title to something like "Revert LargeCommitTest"?

@ahmedabu98
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #33746

@Abacn Abacn changed the title Revert "[Dataflow Streaming Appliance] Fix per key commit size validation" Revert Revert LargeCommitTest Jan 23, 2025
@Abacn Abacn mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2025
3 tasks
@Abacn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Abacn commented Jan 23, 2025

testConsumedWorkItems_itemsSplitAcrossResponses (org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.windmill.client.grpc.GrpcDirectGetWorkStreamTest) failed, known issue #28957

not related to this change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants