Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update RFC6265bis links #232

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024
Merged

Update RFC6265bis links #232

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

inexorabletash
Copy link
Member

@inexorabletash inexorabletash commented Jun 7, 2024

Bikeshed supports section links (yay!) into biblio-referenced RFCs (also yay!), but it seemingly fails to resolve [[RFC6265bis]] and section links against the latest (-14 as of this commit) version of the draft RFC, which means linking to later added subsections fails.

Using a custom biblio reference to rfc6265bis-14 works, but then the auto-links are ugly. Also, the RFC supports named links. So... until this is all sorted, use named links and explicit (but shorter) linking text.


💥 Error: 400 Bad Request 💥

PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Jun 7, 2024, 9:54 PM UTC).

More

PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one:

🚨 CSS Spec Preprocessor - CSS Spec Preprocessor is the web service used to build Bikeshed specs.

🔗 [Related URL]([object Object])

Error running preprocessor, returned code: 2.
LINK ERROR: Multiple possible 'documents' dfn refs.
Arbitrarily chose https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-document
To auto-select one of the following refs, insert one of these lines into a <pre class=link-defaults> block:
spec:dom; type:dfn; text:document
spec:css-style-attr; type:dfn; text:document
[=documents=]
LINK ERROR: Multiple possible 'documents' dfn refs.
Arbitrarily chose https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-document
To auto-select one of the following refs, insert one of these lines into a <pre class=link-defaults> block:
spec:dom; type:dfn; text:document
spec:css-style-attr; type:dfn; text:document
[=Documents=]
LINK ERROR: Multiple possible 'document' dfn refs.
Arbitrarily chose https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-document
To auto-select one of the following refs, insert one of these lines into a <pre class=link-defaults> block:
spec:dom; type:dfn; text:document
spec:css-style-attr; type:dfn; text:document
[=Document=]
LINK ERROR: Multiple possible 'TypeError' idl refs.
Arbitrarily chose https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/fundamental-objects.html#sec-native-error-types-used-in-this-standard-typeerror
To auto-select one of the following refs, insert one of these lines into a <pre class=link-defaults> block:
spec:ecmascript; type:exception; text:TypeError
spec:webidl; type:exception; text:TypeError
{{TypeError}}
FATAL ERROR: Couldn't find section '#section-5.7.3' in spec 'rfc6265bis':
[[RFC6265bis#section-5.7.3]]
 ✘  Did not generate, due to errors exceeding the allowed error level.

If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please file an issue.

@inexorabletash inexorabletash requested a review from ayuishii June 7, 2024 21:40
Copy link
Collaborator

@ayuishii ayuishii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!

Bikeshed supports section links (yay!) into biblio-referenced RFCs
(also yay!), but it seemingly fails to resolve [[RFC6265bis]] and
section links against the latest (-14 as of this commit) version of
the draft RFC, which means linking to later added subsections fails.

Using a custom biblio reference to rfc6265bis-14 works, but then the
auto-links are ugly. Also, the RFC supports named links. So... until
this is all sorted, use named links and explicit (but shorter) linking
text.
@inexorabletash inexorabletash merged commit 7f81399 into main Jun 7, 2024
2 checks passed
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
SHA: 7f81399
Reason: push, by inexorabletash

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants