Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update COPIERTemplate with recommended optional questions #51

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

abelsiqueira
Copy link
Member

This should be rebased after #50.

This runs the update command and change minimum to recommended.

@abelsiqueira
Copy link
Member Author

Link checker fails for links that don't exist yet

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.53%. Comparing base (e843fd1) to head (7de4e42).

Current head 7de4e42 differs from pull request most recent head c7d07e0

Please upload reports for the commit c7d07e0 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #51   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.53%   66.53%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines         254      254           
=======================================
  Hits          169      169           
  Misses         85       85           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@abelsiqueira abelsiqueira force-pushed the apply-template-recommended branch from 7de4e42 to c7d07e0 Compare June 17, 2024 10:21
@abelsiqueira abelsiqueira changed the title Apply COPIERTemplate 0.5.4 with recommended optional questions Update COPIERTemplate with recommended optional questions Jun 17, 2024
@abelsiqueira abelsiqueira marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2024 10:27
@abelsiqueira
Copy link
Member Author

@suvayu this changes the template to use the recommended answers. Since some of the files here were from TulipaEnergyModel before, they are updated instead of added (e.g., workflows). That's why there are currently dependant PRs fixing the workflow versions, while this PR also fixes those changes (because from the template POV, it's the first time they are being added).

@abelsiqueira abelsiqueira requested a review from suvayu June 17, 2024 10:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants