Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/licences for workflow in download dialog full #36

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

florianesser-tng
Copy link

Description:

Please provide a brief description of the changes made in this pull request.

Related Issue:

If this pull request is related to any existing issue, please mention the issue number here.

Changes Made:

Please list down the specific changes made in this pull request.

Testing Done:

Please describe the testing that has been done to ensure the changes made in this pull request are functioning as expected.

Screenshots:

If applicable, please provide screenshots or GIFs or videos to visually demonstrate the changes made.

Checklist:

  • I have tested the changes locally.
  • I have self-reviewed the code changes.
  • I have updated the documentation, if necessary.

@florianesser-tng florianesser-tng force-pushed the feature/licencesForWorkflowInDownloadDialog_full branch from 4779013 to 72f0915 Compare December 19, 2024 15:48
florianesser-tng and others added 6 commits December 19, 2024 18:05
some workflows may fetch models from different places (e.g. from within the logic of the node itself)
these models may still be bound to explicit approval by customer, which we prompt by the download dialog
Ideally, we would need to merge the downloading dialog of the models with the downloading of the custom node
But we do not have the time.

Signed-off-by: Florian Esser <[email protected]>
Pass value of licence link through complete chain
Ideally, operations should be itemwise, not listwise,
then I would not require this quickfix of passing
it throught he complete chain. But there is unfortunately
no time

Signed-off-by: Florian Esser <[email protected]>
They introduce too much hastle to deal with and
are too risky for the release.
We are capturing user consent via the other loaded
modles."

Signed-off-by: Florian Esser <[email protected]>
Addition of transitive comfyUI-node model downloads requires additional UI elements.

Signed-off-by: marijnvg-tng <[email protected]>
SetupProgressListener were not correctly resetted
Setup function of comfyUI backend was broken after lsLevelZeroExe Call
optimations
Listen to comfyServerState == running instead of isSetup

Signed-off-by: Florian Esser <[email protected]>
uv no longer part of python env
@florianesser-tng florianesser-tng force-pushed the feature/licencesForWorkflowInDownloadDialog_full branch from e7a78ec to 6f08ac0 Compare December 19, 2024 17:05
git rev parse failed due to windows 5 error. Hence, be a little more
forgiving on reading it
Safeguard disable/enable calls to backend. Due to the v-ifs being
exchanged with v-shows, at startup time we now call these functions
and they might fail. A reject at this time leads to the app being
locked.

Signed-off-by: Florian Esser <[email protected]>
@mschuettlerTNG mschuettlerTNG merged commit a2fdd10 into dev Dec 19, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@mschuettlerTNG mschuettlerTNG deleted the feature/licencesForWorkflowInDownloadDialog_full branch January 29, 2025 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants