Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactors quantization guide #480

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

Refactors quantization guide #480

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

pranavm-nvidia
Copy link
Collaborator

@pranavm-nvidia pranavm-nvidia commented Jan 18, 2025

Refactors quantization guide

  • Refactors quantization guide to be more concise
  • Updates nvidia-modelopt version so we don't need a special package index
  • Reduces threshold for summary mode when pretty printing tensors.
  • Adds a # doc: no-output tag to omit output from code examples.

@pranavm-nvidia pranavm-nvidia changed the title Refactors quantization guide (do not review - still in draft) Refactors quantization guide Jan 21, 2025
@pranavm-nvidia pranavm-nvidia marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2025 18:41
@pranavm-nvidia pranavm-nvidia force-pushed the quantization-guide branch 7 times, most recently from a8ed97a to 41804e4 Compare January 22, 2025 19:31
@pranavm-nvidia pranavm-nvidia force-pushed the quantization-guide branch 2 times, most recently from ae1edb8 to bf0c7c7 Compare January 22, 2025 22:40
- Refactors quantization guide to be more concise
- Updates `nvidia-modelopt` version so we don't need a special package index
- Reduces threshold for summary mode when pretty printing tensors.
- Adds a `# doc: no-output` tag to omit output from code examples.
@pranavm-nvidia pranavm-nvidia merged commit 2838b73 into main Jan 22, 2025
1 check passed
@pranavm-nvidia pranavm-nvidia deleted the quantization-guide branch January 22, 2025 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants