fix: add bsc link to privacy snapshot

[montelaidev]

Description

This PR adds the link tx-sentinel-bsc-mainnet.api.cx.metamask.io to the privacy snapshot file.

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

• I've followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Extension Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[montelaidev]

Maybe this should be tx-sentinel-*-mainnet.api.cx.metamask.io

[gauthierpetetin]

Hi @montelaidev , I'm curious to know if tx-sentinel-bsc-mainnet.api.cx.metamask.io aligns with our privacy principles. I assume the answer is yes, given that the implementation is likely similar to tx-sentinel-ethereum-mainnet.api.cx.metamask.io, but I wanted to confirm this and also take the opportunity to emphasize the importance of these privacy principles throughout our organization.

[montelaidev]

I saw that this new request was causing the failure of the CI for all the PRs right now. I'm not the creator of this new request, perhaps i should close this and let someone from the api team to create a pr for this new request.

[seaona]

We could merge this PR to unblock ci.
I've opened an issue here to address the root cause:

#30490

and this one for adding a mock

#30491

[seaona]

this issue is now fixed by this PR from @Gudahtt , so we can close the PR

#30507