Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: btcstaking module's CreateBTCStaking interface #105

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 15, 2024

Conversation

sheldonleedev
Copy link
Collaborator

@sheldonleedev sheldonleedev commented Aug 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for a new staking event type: BTCB Staking.
    • Enhanced staking records to include a plan identifier for better tracking.
    • Introduced an event emission for new staking records improving event management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated internal logic to ensure accurate handling of minting addresses and outcomes.
  • Documentation

    • Expanded event types and attributes for better compliance with event-driven practices.
  • Tests

    • Improved test coverage for BTC staking operations, particularly with minting and receiving addresses.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates introduce significant enhancements to BTC and BTCB staking processes, adding new message definitions, improved error handling, and greater flexibility in minting operations. A new event for BTCB staking is established, and existing structures are bolstered with additional fields for tracking. Overall, these enhancements aim to improve the functionality, clarity, and event-driven interactions within the staking ecosystem.

Changes

Files Summary
proto/lorenzo/btcstaking/v1/event.proto, proto/lorenzo/btcstaking/v1/staking_record.proto New message for BTCB staking events and added plan_id fields to staking records enhance tracking and extensibility.
x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking.go, x/btcstaking/keeper/msg_server.go, x/btcstaking/keeper/staking.go Modifications to staking logic, including new parameters for minting, improved error handling, and clearer event emissions.
x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking_test.go Test enhancements to reflect changes in minting and receiving addresses, ensuring robust coverage of new scenarios.
x/btcstaking/types/events.go, x/plan/keeper/plan.go, x/plan/types/events.go New event creation functions and constants for minting events improve the event-handling capabilities across the system.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant MsgServer
    participant Keeper
    participant EventManager

    User->>MsgServer: CreateBTCStaking(msg)
    MsgServer->>Keeper: Delegate(btcStakingRecord, mintToAddr, receiverAddr, btcAmount, planId)
    Keeper->>EventManager: Emit EventBTCBStakingCreated
    EventManager-->>User: Notify staking event
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where the bunnies play,
New updates hop in, brightening the day!
With BTCB staking, oh what a treat,
Minting and plans make it all quite sweet.
Events now dance, in joyous array,
Hooray for the code, hip-hip-hooray! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b5face and cf9073b.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • x/btcstaking/types/event.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
  • x/btcstaking/types/staking_record.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (9)
  • proto/lorenzo/btcstaking/v1/event.proto (1 hunks)
  • proto/lorenzo/btcstaking/v1/staking_record.proto (2 hunks)
  • x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking.go (2 hunks)
  • x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking_test.go (8 hunks)
  • x/btcstaking/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
  • x/btcstaking/keeper/staking.go (1 hunks)
  • x/btcstaking/types/events.go (1 hunks)
  • x/plan/keeper/plan.go (2 hunks)
  • x/plan/types/events.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (14)
x/btcstaking/types/events.go (1)

14-18: New function NewEventBTCBStakingCreated looks good!

The addition of the NewEventBTCBStakingCreated function is consistent with existing patterns and enhances event handling for BTCB staking. Ensure that this new event is integrated and utilized appropriately in the system.

proto/lorenzo/btcstaking/v1/event.proto (1)

13-15: New message EventBTCBStakingCreated is well-defined!

The addition of the EventBTCBStakingCreated message enhances the protocol's ability to handle BTCB staking events. Ensure this message is properly integrated into the system's event processing logic.

proto/lorenzo/btcstaking/v1/staking_record.proto (1)

19-19: Addition of plan_id fields is a valuable enhancement!

The inclusion of plan_id in both BTCStakingRecord and BTCBStakingRecord enhances the records' ability to track and associate with specific plans. Ensure that these fields are utilized effectively in the application logic.

Also applies to: 39-39

x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking.go (1)

20-20: Ensure proper usage of mintToAddr.

The addition of mintToAddr allows for more flexible minting operations. Verify that all calls to Delegate provide the correct address and that this change does not introduce any unintended side effects.

Verification successful

All instances of the Delegate function correctly use the mintToAddr parameter.

The integration of the mintToAddr parameter in the Delegate function is consistent across the codebase, including test cases. This ensures that the new parameter is utilized correctly without introducing unintended side effects. The function calls in both msg_server.go and btc_staking_test.go files confirm this usage.

  • Files verified:
    • x/btcstaking/keeper/msg_server.go
    • x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking_test.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `Delegate` use the new `mintToAddr` parameter.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: All occurrences to use the new parameter.
rg --type go -A 5 $'Delegate'

Length of output: 3175

x/btcstaking/keeper/staking.go (1)

71-85: Verify event emission and PlanId usage.

The addition of PlanId and event emission enhances data tracking and event-driven interactions. Ensure that the event emission correctly reflects the intended behavior and that PlanId is consistently used throughout the codebase.

Verification successful

Event Emission and PlanId Usage Verified

The PlanId is consistently used across the codebase, and the event emission for BTCBStakingRecord is correctly implemented using EmitTypedEvent. No issues found with the changes.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `PlanId` and the correctness of event emissions.

# Test: Search for the usage of `PlanId` in `BTCBStakingRecord`. Expect: Consistent usage.
rg --type go 'PlanId'

# Test: Search for event emissions related to `BTCBStakingRecord`. Expect: Correct implementation.
rg --type go 'EmitTypedEvent'

Length of output: 9086

x/plan/types/events.go (1)

63-67: Ensure consistent usage of new event constants.

The new constants for event handling improve the system's ability to track and manage events. Verify that these constants are consistently used in event-related code across the codebase.

Verification successful

New event constants are consistently used across the codebase.

The constants EventTypeMintYAT, AttributeKeyAccount, AttributeKeyAmount, and AttributeKeyPlanId are integrated into the event-handling logic in relevant files, ensuring consistent usage.

  • EventTypeMintYAT is used in x/plan/keeper/plan.go.
  • AttributeKeyAccount, AttributeKeyAmount, and AttributeKeyPlanId are used in x/token/keeper/convert.go and x/plan/keeper/plan.go.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new event constants in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of `EventTypeMintYAT`. Expect: Consistent usage.
rg --type go 'EventTypeMintYAT'

# Test: Search for the usage of `AttributeKeyAccount`, `AttributeKeyAmount`, and `AttributeKeyPlanId`. Expect: Consistent usage.
rg --type go 'AttributeKey(Account|Amount|PlanId)'

Length of output: 998

x/plan/keeper/plan.go (1)

104-112: Emit event for minting operations.

The addition of event emission after minting enhances transparency and aligns with event-driven architecture best practices. Ensure that all attributes are correctly formatted and that listeners are prepared to handle these events.

x/btcstaking/keeper/msg_server.go (1)

150-150: Enhance Delegate method call with receiver address.

The inclusion of receiverAddr in the Delegate method call provides additional flexibility in specifying the minting address. Ensure that this change is reflected in all relevant parts of the codebase and that any downstream effects are considered.

Verification successful

All Delegate method calls include receiverAddr. The receiverAddr parameter is consistently included in the Delegate method calls across the codebase, ensuring flexibility in specifying the minting address. No further action is needed.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `Delegate` method to ensure all calls include the `receiverAddr` parameter.

# Test: Search for the `Delegate` method usage. Expect: All occurrences should include `receiverAddr`.
rg --type go -A 3 'Delegate\('

Length of output: 1880


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the full context of the Delegate method call in the test file to verify the inclusion of receiverAddr.
rg --type go -A 10 -B 2 'suite.keeper.Delegate\(' x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking_test.go

Length of output: 389

x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking_test.go (6)

25-25: Expand tmpRequest structure for enhanced testing.

The addition of mintAddr and receiverAddr fields in the tmpRequest structure allows for more nuanced testing scenarios, improving test coverage and robustness.


Line range hint 48-71:
Test case: Plan not found scenario.

The test case effectively checks the behavior when a plan is not found. Ensure that the expected outcomes align with the current business logic.


Line range hint 85-119:
Test case: Agent ID mismatch scenario.

The test case accurately validates the behavior when the agent ID does not match. This ensures the system handles such discrepancies correctly.


Line range hint 150-187:
Test case: Mint YAT error scenario.

The test case covers scenarios where minting YAT encounters errors, ensuring robustness in error handling and validation.


Line range hint 225-305:
Test case: Successful minting scenario.

The test case confirms successful minting operations, validating correct balance updates and event emissions. Ensure all assertions align with expected outcomes.


306-393: New test case: MintAddr not equal to ReceiverAddr.

The new test case effectively validates scenarios where the minting address differs from the receiving address, enhancing the test suite's comprehensiveness.

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 560055a into main Aug 15, 2024
11 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the fix/btcstaking branch August 15, 2024 02:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants