Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TypedSyntax.jl: drop old version support #553

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2024

Conversation

aviatesk
Copy link
Member

@aviatesk aviatesk commented Mar 3, 2024

Given that Cthulhu is the only user of TypedSyntax currently, and considering the newer versions of Cthulhu no longer supports older Julia versions like 1.6, I believe there isn't much merit in maintaining support for older Julia versions within TypedSyntax. We anticipate the need for fixes to TypedSyntax's reflection capabilities, like #547, however, continuing to provide support for these features across older versions proves to be a significant hassle. Therefore, I'm inclined to match TypedSyntax.jl's supported Julia version with that of Cthulhu.

Additionally, we've found that if Cthulhu's tests fail, TypedSyntax.jl's tests don't get executed, leading to unnoticed regressions in the latter. So I've opted to separate and individually run the tests for both Cthulhu and TypedSyntax.

Given that Cthulhu is the only user of TypedSyntax currently, and
considering the newer versions of Cthulhu no longer supports older Julia
versions like 1.6, I believe there isn't much merit in maintaining
support for older Julia versions within TypedSyntax. We anticipate the need
for fixes to TypedSyntax's reflection capabilities, like #547, however,
continuing to provide support for these features across older versions
proves to be a significant hassle. Therefore, I'm inclined to match
TypedSyntax.jl's supported Julia version with that of Cthulhu.

Additionally, we've found that if Cthulhu's tests fail, TypedSyntax.jl's
tests don't get executed, leading to unnoticed regressions in the
latter. So I've opted to separate and individually run the tests for
both Cthulhu and TypedSyntax.
@aviatesk aviatesk requested a review from timholy March 3, 2024 10:21
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (33c2379) to head (520fbfd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #553   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files           9       9           
  Lines        1507    1532   +25     
======================================
- Misses       1507    1532   +25     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aviatesk
Copy link
Member Author

aviatesk commented Mar 3, 2024

I haven't received any reviews yet, but I'm considering merging this in order for #547 and other PRs to make progress. If anyone wants to keep support for versions 1.6~1.9, please inform me. I'm willing to take responsibility for any necessary reverts.

Note that the failures of TypedSyntaxCI on 1.11-nightly and nightly are not new regression, but existing ones (although we may have not perceived yet).

@aviatesk aviatesk merged commit 8d34d4d into master Mar 3, 2024
17 of 29 checks passed
@aviatesk aviatesk deleted the avi/typed-syntax-version branch March 3, 2024 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants