-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 223
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extract external routines in one pass #8054
Open
vasiliy-yashkov
wants to merge
2
commits into
FirebirdSQL:master
Choose a base branch
from
red-soft-ru:master_isql_extract_external_routines
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How this is supposed to work with pre ODS13 databases ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Current ISQL (FB 3-4-5) cannot extract procedures/functions from pre-ODS12 databases, so nothing really changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both
list_external_procedures()
andlist_external_functions()
is called unconditionally byEXTRACT_ddl()
, seehttps://github.com/FirebirdSQL/firebird/pull/8054/files#diff-580a2883156750bdebc94df7a24f090f8b288b49558292ae66fde9b21cbbc432R184
so, what happens in case of pre-ODS13 DB ?
Error will be raised ?
Nothing, as query below returns no rows ?
Why assert then ? It will not make DEBUG build happy, AFAIU.
I just want it to be clear.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Error "field does not exist". You may find the same assert in
list_procedure_bodies()
which is also executed unconditionally. AFAIU, the only purpose of the assert is to warn that the extract function is not able to deal with older ODS. We may remove these asserts separately, if you disagree with their usage in general. They are not related to this PR and existed before.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Strange logic, as for me - use assert and runtime error instead of condition and correct handling of old ODS.
I agree, it is not related with this PR. I never looked into this code before and thus wondering.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIRC, it was discussed in fb-devel and we agreed to simplify the code this way, but it was ages ago...