Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix incorrect example #49

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2024
Merged

Fix incorrect example #49

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

TransAMrit
Copy link
Contributor

@TransAMrit TransAMrit commented Jul 31, 2024

This example was printing row without updating its value from the new "res" object. Now, it prints "1 instead of "Valentino Rossi".

Additionally, if this script was run multiple times, the results would change. Now we delete the graph's contents so the script returns consistent results.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced script reliability by ensuring the graph is cleared before creating new nodes and relationships.
    • Improved clarity by updating how query results are printed, ensuring they accurately reflect the intended output.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Addressed issues related to residual data in the graph from previous executions.

This example was printing row without updating its value from the new "res" object. Now, it prints "1 instead of "Valentino Rossi".

Additionally, if this script was run multiple times, the results would change. Now we delete the graph's contents so the script returns consistent results.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance a graph database interaction script by ensuring a clean slate for the 'MotoGP' graph through a data-clearing operation before new entries are added. This modification improves the script’s reliability for repeated executions. Additionally, the output handling has been refined for clarity, allowing for a more accurate representation of query results. Overall, these updates streamline functionality and improve user experience.

Changes

Files Change Summary
index.md Introduced a graph-clearing step before data insertion and refined query result output for clarity.

Poem

In the graph where engines roar,
A clean slate opens up the door.
Old data flies, new tales to weave,
Clarity shines, oh how we believe!
With every change, a brighter day,
Hopping forward, come what may! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bbf30cb and 2432b06.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • index.md (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
index.md (2)

48-49: LGTM! Clearing the graph ensures consistent results.

The addition of g.delete() ensures that the graph is cleared before new data is added, which helps in achieving consistent results across multiple executions.


66-66: LGTM! Improved result handling for clarity.

The modification to directly access the first element of the result set improves the clarity and accuracy of the output.

@gkorland gkorland requested a review from swilly22 August 13, 2024 06:02
@swilly22 swilly22 merged commit ff1e2ab into FalkorDB:main Aug 13, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants