Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update snapshot.yml sys env #101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

Update snapshot.yml sys env #101

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

gkorland
Copy link
Contributor

@gkorland gkorland commented Jan 23, 2025

PR Type

configuration changes


Description

  • Updated Maven credentials in snapshot.yml workflow.

  • Replaced OSSH_USERNAME and OSSH_PASSWORD with OSSRH_PASSWORD.


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Configuration changes
snapshot.yml
Update Maven credentials in workflow configuration             

.github/workflows/snapshot.yml

  • Updated environment variables for Maven credentials.
  • Replaced OSSH_USERNAME and OSSH_PASSWORD with OSSRH_PASSWORD.
  • +3/-3     

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • Summary by CodeRabbit

    • Chores
      • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration for snapshot deployment
      • Consolidated deployment credentials into a single secret

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

    Caution

    Review failed

    The pull request is closed.

    Walkthrough

    The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for snapshot deployment. The changes involve updating environment variable assignments in the .github/workflows/snapshot.yml file, specifically replacing two separate secrets (OSSH_USERNAME and OSSH_PASSWORD) with a single secret (OSSRH_PASSWORD) for both MAVEN_USERNAME and MAVEN_PASSWORD.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    .github/workflows/snapshot.yml Updated environment variables for deployment step, consolidating secrets from separate username and password to a single password secret

    Poem

    🐰 A workflow tweak, secrets rearranged
    Maven's path subtly changed
    One password to rule them all
    GitHub Actions standing tall
    Deployment's rabbit hops with glee! 🚀


    📜 Recent review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL
    Plan: Pro

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f2436e and bfb75bd.

    📒 Files selected for processing (1)
    • .github/workflows/snapshot.yml (1 hunks)

    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 Security concerns

    Sensitive information exposure:
    The workflow is using the same secret (OSSRH_PASSWORD) for both username and password fields in Maven deployment. This appears to be a misconfiguration that could potentially expose or misuse credentials. Maven repositories typically require separate username and password values for authentication.

    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Incorrect Credentials

    Using the same secret OSSRH_PASSWORD for both username and password fields seems incorrect. Maven deployment typically requires different values for username and password.

    MAVEN_USERNAME: ${{secrets.OSSRH_PASSWORD}}
    MAVEN_PASSWORD: ${{secrets.OSSRH_PASSWORD}}

    @gkorland gkorland merged commit cc2e9cd into master Jan 23, 2025
    2 of 4 checks passed
    @gkorland gkorland deleted the gkorland-patch-1 branch January 23, 2025 12:09
    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Security
    Separate credentials for security

    Using the same secret for both username and password compromises security. Use
    distinct secrets for MAVEN_USERNAME and MAVEN_PASSWORD.

    .github/workflows/snapshot.yml [45-46]

    -MAVEN_USERNAME: ${{secrets.OSSRH_PASSWORD}}
    +MAVEN_USERNAME: ${{secrets.OSSRH_USERNAME}}
     MAVEN_PASSWORD: ${{secrets.OSSRH_PASSWORD}}
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    Why: Using the same secret for both username and password is a serious security issue that violates the principle of credential separation. The suggestion correctly identifies this security vulnerability and provides the proper fix by using distinct secrets.

    10

    Copy link

    codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

    Codecov Report

    All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

    Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (9f2436e) to head (bfb75bd).
    Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

    Additional details and impacted files
    @@          Coverage Diff           @@
    ##           master    #101   +/-   ##
    ======================================
      Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
    ======================================
      Files          25      25           
      Lines         712     712           
      Branches       64      64           
    ======================================
      Misses        712     712           

    ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
    📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant