Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add delay to avoid rate limits #43

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sibeliu
Copy link

@sibeliu sibeliu commented Dec 8, 2024

simple time.sleep() parameter to add delay

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new parameter, delay, in the process of handling sources to manage rate limits with customizable pauses.
  • Documentation

    • Updated documentation to include details about the new delay parameter in the process_sources method.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new delay parameter to the process_sources method in the KnowledgeGraph class, allowing for a specified pause between processing iterations of provided sources. The method signature is updated to include this parameter, which defaults to zero seconds. The implementation now includes a call to time.sleep(delay) within the processing loop. Additionally, the docstring for the method is updated to reflect this new parameter, and an import statement for the time module is added.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
graphrag_sdk/kg.py - Added delay parameter to process_sources method (default 0).
- Updated method implementation to include time.sleep(delay) in the processing loop.
- Modified docstring to describe the new delay parameter.
- Added import time statement at the beginning of the file.

Poem

In the garden of code, a pause we now make,
With a delay in our process, for efficiency's sake.
Each source we gather, with care and with grace,
A moment to breathe, in our digital space.
So hop along, friends, as we manage our flow,
With time on our side, watch our knowledge grow! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
graphrag_sdk/kg.py (3)

137-144: Consider adding validation for the delay parameter.

While the parameter addition is good, consider adding validation to ensure the delay value is non-negative to prevent potential misuse.

 def process_sources(
     self, sources: list[AbstractSource], instructions: str = None, delay: float = 0
 ) -> None:
+    if delay < 0:
+        raise ValueError("Delay must be non-negative")

156-156: Consider optimizing rate limit handling.

The current implementation adds delay after adding sources to the set, but the rate-limited operations likely occur in _create_graph_with_sources. Consider:

  1. Moving the delay into _create_graph_with_sources where the actual API calls happen
  2. Adding debug logging to help track rate limit occurrences
 def _create_graph_with_sources(
     self, sources: list[AbstractSource] | None = None, instructions: str = None
 ):
+    logger.debug(f"Processing sources with delay: {delay} seconds")
     for source in sources:
         step = ExtractDataStep(
             sources=[source],
             ontology=self.ontology,
             model=self._model_config.extract_data,
             graph=self.graph,
         )
         step.run(instructions)
+        if delay > 0:
+            logger.debug(f"Applying rate limit delay: {delay} seconds")
+            time.sleep(delay)

Consider using the ratelimit decorator for consistent rate limiting

The codebase already uses the ratelimit package with @limits and @sleep_and_retry decorators in both extract_data_step.py and create_ontology_step.py for rate limiting API calls (15 calls per 60 seconds). For consistency, consider replacing the manual time.sleep(delay) implementation with the same decorator pattern.

  • graphrag_sdk/kg.py: Replace manual time.sleep(delay) with @limits and @sleep_and_retry decorators from the ratelimit package
  • Consider standardizing the rate limits across the codebase (currently 15 calls/60s in other files)
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 137-156: Verify consistency with existing rate limiting patterns.

Let's check if there are similar rate limiting implementations in the codebase that we could learn from or standardize with.


Let me gather more context about the other rate limiting implementations to make a proper assessment.


Let me check how the ratelimit decorators are being used in these files to understand the complete rate limiting pattern.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing rate limiting patterns
echo "Searching for time.sleep usage..."
rg "time\.sleep"

echo "Searching for rate limit related comments..."
rg -i "rate limit"

echo "Searching for delay parameter patterns..."
rg "delay:\s*float"

Length of output: 799


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation in extract_data_step.py and create_ontology_step.py
echo "Checking extract_data_step.py implementation:"
rg -A 5 -B 5 "time\.sleep\(10\)" graphrag_sdk/steps/extract_data_step.py

echo -e "\nChecking create_ontology_step.py implementation:"
rg -A 5 -B 5 "time\.sleep\(10\)" graphrag_sdk/steps/create_ontology_step.py

# Check if there are any rate limit related imports or decorators
echo -e "\nChecking for rate limit related imports:"
rg "import.*rate.*limit" -i
rg "from.*rate.*limit" -i

Length of output: 1625


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how ratelimit decorators are used
echo "Checking ratelimit usage in extract_data_step.py:"
rg -A 10 -B 2 "@.*limits" graphrag_sdk/steps/extract_data_step.py

echo -e "\nChecking ratelimit usage in create_ontology_step.py:"
rg -A 10 -B 2 "@.*limits" graphrag_sdk/steps/create_ontology_step.py

Length of output: 1125

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2c182a and 8f148cc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • graphrag_sdk/kg.py (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
graphrag_sdk/kg.py (1)

3-3: LGTM: Import placement is correct.

The time module import is appropriately placed with other standard library imports.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant