update rt_netlink.c - END.DT6 SEG6_LOCAL_VRFTABLE #17977
+2
−2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
END.DT6 should use SEG6_LOCAL_VRFTABLE, not SEG6_LOCAL_TABLE Signed-off-by: zhutang <[email protected]>
cscarpitta
reviewed
Feb 3, 2025
yes, I am trying to fix an issue. based on [iproute2-next v1 1/1] seg6: add support for vrftable attribute in End.DT4/DT6 behaviors, and seg6: add support for the SRv6 End.DT4 behavior, I think End.DT4/DT6 leverages a VRF device in order to force the routing however, topotest bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf failed after rt_netlink.c is changed, I am checking the reason of this fail. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
END.DT6 should use SEG6_LOCAL_VRFTABLE, not SEG6_LOCAL_TABLE