create-lazy-loading #90
Conversation
|
@prime1999 is attempting to deploy a commit to the EddieHub Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@prime1999 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe updates primarily involve enhancing the user experience by introducing dynamic imports for components, adding skeleton loaders, and refactoring state management and rendering logic. These changes aim to improve page load times and provide a more responsive interface with visual feedback during data fetching. Changes
Related issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (9)
- src/components/Activity.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/ListSkeletons/ActivitySkeleton.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/ListSkeletons/RepoListSkeleton.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/ListSkeletons/StatSkeleton.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/Repos.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/Stats.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/componentList/ActivityList.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/componentList/RepoList.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/componentList/StatsList.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/components/ListSkeletons/ActivitySkeleton.js
- src/components/ListSkeletons/RepoListSkeleton.js
Additional comments: 5
src/components/ListSkeletons/StatSkeleton.js (1)
- 1-12: The
StatSkeletoncomponent is well-structured and uses appropriate Tailwind CSS classes for styling the skeleton elements.src/components/componentList/StatsList.js (1)
- 1-19: The
StatsListcomponent is implemented correctly, with proper use of theabbreviateNumberutility and conditional rendering for thestat.unit.src/components/Activity.js (1)
- 1-51: The dynamic import of
ActivityListwith a loading fallback and disabled SSR is implemented correctly. The use ofuseEffectfor fetching data and subscribing to events is appropriate.src/components/Repos.js (1)
- 1-74: The dynamic import of
RepoListwith a loading fallback and disabled SSR is implemented correctly. The refactoring of thecalStatusfunction and its use withingetReposis appropriate, and the use ofuseEffectfor fetching data and subscribing to events is well done.src/components/componentList/RepoList.js (1)
- 1-79: The
RepoListcomponent is implemented correctly, with proper use of Next.js'sImageandLinkcomponents, dynamicalttext for images, and theclassNamesutility for styling.
| <> | ||
| <li className="px-4 py-4 sm:px-6 lg:px-8"> | ||
| <div className="flex items-center gap-x-3"> | ||
| <Link href={`https://github.com/${rating.username}`} target="_blank"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The target="_blank" attribute is used without rel="noopener noreferrer". For security reasons, consider adding rel="noopener noreferrer" to any link opening in a new tab.
- <Link href={`https://github.com/${rating.username}`} target="_blank">
+ <Link href={`https://github.com/${rating.username}`} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| <Link href={`https://github.com/${rating.username}`} target="_blank"> | |
| <Link href={`https://github.com/${rating.username}`} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> |
| const stats = [ | ||
| { name: "Total Ratings", value: data.ratings, unit: "⭐️" }, | ||
| { name: "Total Repos", value: data.repos, unit: "GitHub" }, | ||
| { name: "Total Stars", value: data.stars, unit: "⭐️" }, | ||
| { | ||
| name: "Recommended Repos", | ||
| value: ((data.stars / data.ratings / 5) * 100).toFixed(1), | ||
| unit: "%", | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider refactoring the inline calculation for 'Recommended Repos' percentage into a separate function for better readability and maintainability.
- value: ((data.stars / data.ratings / 5) * 100).toFixed(1),
+ value: calculateRecommendedReposPercentage(data.stars, data.ratings).toFixed(1),
// Outside of the component
function calculateRecommendedReposPercentage(stars, ratings) {
return (stars / ratings / 5) * 100;
}Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| const stats = [ | |
| { name: "Total Ratings", value: data.ratings, unit: "⭐️" }, | |
| { name: "Total Repos", value: data.repos, unit: "GitHub" }, | |
| { name: "Total Stars", value: data.stars, unit: "⭐️" }, | |
| { | |
| name: "Recommended Repos", | |
| value: ((data.stars / data.ratings / 5) * 100).toFixed(1), | |
| unit: "%", | |
| }, | |
| const stats = [ | |
| { name: "Total Ratings", value: data.ratings, unit: "⭐️" }, | |
| { name: "Total Repos", value: data.repos, unit: "GitHub" }, | |
| { name: "Total Stars", value: data.stars, unit: "⭐️" }, | |
| { | |
| name: "Recommended Repos", | |
| value: calculateRecommendedReposPercentage(data.stars, data.ratings).toFixed(1), | |
| unit: "%", | |
| }, |
| const stats = [ | |
| { name: "Total Ratings", value: data.ratings, unit: "⭐️" }, | |
| { name: "Total Repos", value: data.repos, unit: "GitHub" }, | |
| { name: "Total Stars", value: data.stars, unit: "⭐️" }, | |
| { | |
| name: "Recommended Repos", | |
| value: ((data.stars / data.ratings / 5) * 100).toFixed(1), | |
| unit: "%", | |
| }, | |
| // Outside of the component | |
| function calculateRecommendedReposPercentage(stars, ratings) { | |
| return (stars / ratings / 5) * 100; | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- src/components/Activity.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/ListSkeletons/ActivitySkeleton.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/componentList/ActivityList.js (1 hunks)
- tailwind.config.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tailwind.config.js
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/components/Activity.js
- src/components/ListSkeletons/ActivitySkeleton.js
- src/components/componentList/ActivityList.js
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (11)
- src/components/Activity.js (2 hunks)
- src/components/ListSkeletons/ActivitySkeleton.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/ListSkeletons/RepoListSkeleton.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/ListSkeletons/StatSkeleton.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/Repos.js (3 hunks)
- src/components/SideNav.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/Stats.js (2 hunks)
- src/components/Users.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/componentList/ActivityList.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/componentList/RepoList.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/componentList/StatsList.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/components/SideNav.js
- src/components/Users.js
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- src/components/Activity.js
- src/components/ListSkeletons/ActivitySkeleton.js
- src/components/ListSkeletons/RepoListSkeleton.js
- src/components/ListSkeletons/StatSkeleton.js
- src/components/Repos.js
- src/components/Stats.js
- src/components/componentList/ActivityList.js
- src/components/componentList/RepoList.js
- src/components/componentList/StatsList.js
|
I have resolved the prettier settings |
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| plugins: [require("daisyui"), require("@tailwindcss/forms")], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think these indentations are not required?
|
Thank you for making the changes 👍 Could you please resolve the 2 conflicts. If you need any help let me know |
|
yeah, I can't quiet get what the conflict there is |
|
I think there are conflicts because too many files, it might be easier if you select 1 page and create a new PR for that, (we can merge it sooner), then once merged do another PR for the next page |
|
alright will work on it |
|
Thank you 👍 You can close this PR once you create a new one |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- src/components/Activity.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/Repos.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/componentList/ActivityList.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/componentList/RepoList.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- src/components/Activity.js
- src/components/Repos.js
- src/components/componentList/ActivityList.js
- src/components/componentList/RepoList.js
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/components/Activity.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/Stats.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/Activity.js
Additional comments: 3
src/components/Stats.js (3)
9-9: The initialization of
useStateforstatsis correct and follows best practices for setting initial state.11-25: The
getStatsfunction has been correctly updated to useasync/await, which improves readability and error handling over the previous promise-based approach.35-60: The rendering logic within the
returnstatement has been restructured to map over thestatsstate and render UI elements accordingly. This is a common and acceptable pattern in React for rendering lists of components.
| { name: "Total Stars", value: data.stars, unit: "⭐️" }, | ||
| { | ||
| name: "Recommended Repos", | ||
| value: ((data.stars / data.ratings / 5) * 100).toFixed(1), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The inline calculation for 'Recommended Repos' percentage is complex and affects readability. As previously suggested, consider refactoring this into a separate function.
- value: ((data.stars / data.ratings / 5) * 100).toFixed(1),
+ value: calculateRecommendedReposPercentage(data.stars, data.ratings).toFixed(1),
// Outside of the component
function calculateRecommendedReposPercentage(stars, ratings) {
return (stars / ratings / 5) * 100;
}Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| value: ((data.stars / data.ratings / 5) * 100).toFixed(1), | |
| value: calculateRecommendedReposPercentage(data.stars, data.ratings).toFixed(1), |
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| const events = [ | ||
| `databases.${process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_APPWRITE_DATABASE_ID}.collections.${process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_APPWRITE_COLLECTION_APP_ID}.documents`, | ||
| ]; | ||
| client.subscribe(events, () => getStats()); | ||
| getStats(); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The content of Stats.js shows the useEffect hook used for subscribing to Appwrite events. However, there is no cleanup function provided within this hook to unsubscribe from the events when the component unmounts. This aligns with the review comment that pointed out the potential for memory leaks due to missing unsubscribe logic.
Based on the provided content, it can be concluded that the review comment is correct in highlighting the absence of an unsubscribe mechanism, which is a best practice to prevent memory leaks in React components.
Analysis chain
The useEffect hook has been updated to use an arrow function. Ensure that the subscription to Appwrite events is correctly handled and that there are no memory leaks due to missing unsubscribe logic when the component unmounts.
Given the lack of output from the script, it appears that there is no cleanup function provided in the useEffect hook with an empty dependency array. This suggests that the subscription to Appwrite events may not be correctly handled with respect to cleanup, potentially leading to memory leaks when the component unmounts.
To further investigate, we should check for any useEffect hooks that may contain cleanup logic, regardless of their dependency array, to ensure we are not missing any relevant code.
To ensure that we have not missed any cleanup logic that may be defined in a different pattern or outside of the useEffect hook, we should check the entire Stats.js file.
To accurately assess the presence of unsubscribe logic in the useEffect hook, we need to review the full content of the Stats.js file. Let's display the entire file to understand how the useEffect hook is implemented.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that there is an unsubscribe function and it's being called on component unmount
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'useEffect(() => {
$$$
return $_
}, [])'
Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any useEffect hooks that may contain cleanup logic
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'useEffect(() => {
$$$
return $_
}, $$$)'
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the entire Stats.js file for any cleanup logic related to the useEffect hook
rg 'useEffect' src/components/Stats.js
Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Display the content of the Stats.js file to review the useEffect hook implementation
cat src/components/Stats.js
Length of output: 1762
Changes proposed
-- create a skeleton component to show while data is been fetched
-- extracted the repo, activity, and stats list to another component for more code readability
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ActivityListcomponent to display user activities.RepoListcomponent for rendering repository information.ActivitySkeleton,RepoListSkeleton, andStatSkeletonfor improved loading states.Enhancements
Statscomponent to use dynamic imports and modernizedasync/awaitsyntax.Style
Documentation
tailwind.config.jscomments for clearer configuration guidance.