Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2466: STI-ify PayrollAccounts #473

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

2466: STI-ify PayrollAccounts #473

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

allthesignals
Copy link
Contributor

@allthesignals allthesignals commented Feb 27, 2025

Ticket

Resolves FFS-2466.

Changes

Convert PayrollAccounts to an STI with a Pinwheel subclass.

Context for reviewers

Acceptance testing

  • No acceptance testing needed
    • This change will not affect the user experience (bugfix, dependency updates, etc.)
  • Acceptance testing prior to merge
    • This change can be verified visually via screenshots attached below or by sending a link to a local development environment to the acceptance tester
    • Acceptance testing should be done by design for visual changes, product for behavior/logic changes, or both for changes that impact both.
  • Acceptance testing after merge
    • This change is hard to test locally, so we'll test it in the demo environment (deployed automatically after merge.)
    • Make sure to notify the team once this PR is merged so we don't inadvertently deploy the unaccepted change to production. (e.g. :alert: Deploy block! @ffs-eng I just merged PR [#123] and will be doing acceptance testing in demo - please don't deploy until I'm finished!)

Comment on lines +2 to +10
def self.sti_name
# "PayrollAccount::Pinwheel" => "pinwheel"
name.demodulize.downcase
end

def self.sti_class_for(type_name)
# "pinwheel" => PayrollAccount::Pinwheel
PayrollAccount.const_get(type_name.capitalize)
end
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure this is necessary? Since the behavior is default

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess we can try removing it? It probably is not necessary if we are ok with the "type" column having "payroll_account/pinwheel" as the value rather than just "pinwheel".

# Conflicts:
#	app/app/models/payroll_account.rb
#	app/db/schema.rb
#	docs/app/rendered/database-schema.pdf
@allthesignals allthesignals marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 17:31
Comment on lines +2 to +10
def self.sti_name
# "PayrollAccount::Pinwheel" => "pinwheel"
name.demodulize.downcase
end

def self.sti_class_for(type_name)
# "pinwheel" => PayrollAccount::Pinwheel
PayrollAccount.const_get(type_name.capitalize)
end
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess we can try removing it? It probably is not necessary if we are ok with the "type" column having "payroll_account/pinwheel" as the value rather than just "pinwheel".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants