Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding migration process equivalent to Stock Synthesis 3 #427

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SamikDatta
Copy link
Contributor

@SamikDatta SamikDatta commented Oct 9, 2024

  • Please check that the PR fulfills these requirements
  • The commit message follows the Contributor Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Documents have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

Adds the process MigrationSS3 which allows migration to occur. Unit test included.

  • What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

No process exists

  • What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Allows runs with migration to compare to Stock Synthesis 3

  • Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

No.

  • Other information:

@SamikDatta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Migration process now added successfully.

@Zaita
Copy link
Collaborator

Zaita commented Nov 4, 2024

Hi @SamikDatta
Can you please add the relevant information to the User Manual for this new process?

@SamikDatta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @Zaita, just getting around to this now (apologies, I was on holiday when you sent this). Can I double check if the user manual will scrape text for the section automatically from somewhere, or if I just edit the LaTeX file Population.tex directly? Either way this will just take me a few minutes, will do it when I hear from you.

@Zaita
Copy link
Collaborator

Zaita commented Dec 8, 2024

@SamikDatta No. It only scrapes the constructor for parameters to build the syntax section.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants