Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

re-organize file structure #166

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

barraIhsan
Copy link
Contributor

@barraIhsan barraIhsan commented Jan 1, 2025

For now, I put all audio-related and video-related programs from Audio-Video directory to it's own file. And each program (for now, subject to change) that do have a description, will be formatted as

Program Name - Description
Homepage / Repo Link

otherwise

Program Name - Homepage / Repo Link

Further discussion is needed.

Organize all audio-related (daemon, server, music, editor) and
video-related applications into their own dedicated file (`audio.rules`
and `video.rules`).

This approaches are similar to `wine_proton.rules`, and each category
should be sorted in alphabetical order.
@1Naim
Copy link
Member

1Naim commented Jan 7, 2025

For now, I put all audio-related and video-related programs from Audio-Video directory to it's own file

It's already in its own directory so I don't think we need to cram all video/audio players to their own file. IMO splitting Audio and Video to their own respective directories would be better.

@barraIhsan
Copy link
Contributor Author

For now, I put all audio-related and video-related programs from Audio-Video directory to it's own file

It's already in its own directory so I don't think we need to cram all video/audio players to their own file. IMO splitting Audio and Video to their own respective directories would be better.

ahh so

audio/
  program_name.rules
video/
  program_name.rules

Or do we need to categorize it just like wine_proton.rules? so for example

audio/
  player.rules
  editor.rules

@1Naim
Copy link
Member

1Naim commented Jan 7, 2025

ahh so

audio/
  program_name.rules
video/
  program_name.rules

This would be better. There aren't nearly as much video/audio players as games. We can group related apps like what we do with audacity/tenacity in its own file.

@RayJW
Copy link
Contributor

RayJW commented Jan 24, 2025

While you're at it. I just saw the riot.rules file in games, which makes no sense whatsoever. riot.im used to be the domain for the Element Matrix client, and I don't even think they use riot-web any more for their processes. Some one-off places still have that name, like the Flathub package, but even then that's not what the executable is called, and I don't think a chat client needs real-time priority. If you prefer it, I can make a mini PR, but I think that's a refactor that would fit within the scope of this PR as things are being moved anyway.

@barraIhsan
Copy link
Contributor Author

riot.im used to be the domain for the Element Matrix client, and I don't even think they use riot-web any more for their processes

So now they're running under element-desktop?

@RayJW
Copy link
Contributor

RayJW commented Jan 24, 2025

riot.im used to be the domain for the Element Matrix client, and I don't even think they use riot-web any more for their processes

So now they're running under element-desktop?

I personally only use the Flatpak packaging, so I can't fully confirm. But at least the process for the Flatpak is /app/Element/element-desktop, so from what I know about Flatpak packaging the non-flatpak executable would probably be called element-desktop, yes.

Also, unrelated, but maybe you know. I've been wondering for some time, does Ananicy Cpp play nicely with Flatpak, or is it useless for these packages?

@barraIhsan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also, unrelated, but maybe you know. I've been wondering for some time, does Ananicy Cpp play nicely with Flatpak, or is it useless for these packages?

Ananicy cpp just apply changes (e.g. the nice value) to the current running program. I currently have obs installed as a flatpak and yes it does work
image

@barraIhsan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay, so currently we had

00-default/Browsers/browsers.rules
00-default/Chats/chats.rules
00-default/Terminals/terminal.rules
00-default/Terminals/tuifm.rules
00-default/texteditors/texteditor.rules

Is it better to just put them on 00-default/? I think it's fine to put it on 00-default if it's a single category such as browsers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants