-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix state/config loading, test on all PRs and add use case #115
Conversation
You can change the message if you want, but we are merging this into #113. |
sorry, I misread that message. |
I resolved conflicts then ran tests locally with act and they are passing. I figure I should let you merge though if this is what you are looking for. |
No longer need to run the tests locally! :) |
Thanks. |
Did you see I started a review? |
No, I did not. Quite frankly this is the first project I have tried actually using GitHub for so I don't know any of this stuff. |
Yeah, I have no idea what I am supposed to be doing. |
No worries! One step at a time. I left comments (in this PR UI) on the changes you made. Try and find them and respond to them. |
I though comments showed up in this chat, but I don't see any. |
Ok, I can not see the code review I tested it on a private repo and it should be here but its not. |
Scroll through the "files changed" tab. |
Odd. I will check it out tomorrow. |
There are no comments there. |
Alright Good Night! |
@5-pebbles You should be able to see the review now. |
Yup I can. |
I am thinking about separating I think
Its value would look something like this. C.bg_highlight = (options.swap_backgrounds and C.gray0) or C.black1
-- so same as bg_float but without transparency What do you think? |
I don't know why its not showing up in the pr but 4856cf8 contains the proposed changes. |
I re-selected fix/state as base to force sync. |
Sure, I think that will work! |
I think we need a better name than Maybe something like |
I don't know I think But naming this is really not my forte so I will leave that up to you, but I used it for code blocks as well and |
Hmm. I don't think we should use |
Agreed and that is already the case:
|
Ah okay I see, but search should be |
Actually, we need |
Alright I will make a commit for that, but it was |
So What about using I also thought it might make sense to have transparent code blocks and I could add those in the same commit. |
What do you think about my last comment ^ @AlexvZyl |
Sorry @5-pebbles!
|
Also, with customizability, I want to add two callbacks:
But we should do this in a seperate PR. |
The reason I want search to be |
Aright I will fix that, because it is
To make sure we are both on the same page the search highlight is: I will set it to Also would it make sense for code blocks to be transparent with I will get to these tomorrow because I have a bunch of other stuff to do today. |
Okay, this entire time I though the search highlight was that highlight that colors the bottom bar, where you type in the search. The bottom bar should be As for the code blocks being transparent, I am not sure... I think they should be. |
I think they should be
Alright great because I already did that... |
`bg_statusline` and `bg_visual` are no longer set to none with transparent bg. `Search` now uses `bg_visual` & `CodeBlock` is now transparent with `transparent_bg`
If you are okay with those changes I think everything in this pr is done. |
Cool! |
This PR improves the handling of state and config loading.