You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CPI will not automatically delete LBs when a cluster is deleted. This is likely common to all CPIs.
Even if not, we do so by design. We delegate the responsibility uninstall LB applications to the cluster owner before deleting the cluster. We cannot auto-delete such resources since these may be sensitive (someone may have many DNS rules set on an IP, for example).
CPI will not automatically delete LBs when a cluster is deleted. This is likely common to all CPIs.
Even if not, we do so by design. We delegate the responsibility uninstall LB applications to the cluster owner before deleting the cluster. We cannot auto-delete such resources since these may be sensitive (someone may have many DNS rules set on an IP, for example).
But i think it must be an option, because everything what is created dynamical, must be option to delete it dynamically.
So if we or customer create cluster from webui or something like terraform, create multiple pvc, services with load loadbalancers, and maybe everything dynamicaly with gitops. After that cluster get deleted and many do not think to cleanup everything. So Loadbalancers can use limited external IPs, which have some cost and inconveniences to cleanup everything.
And in this case, i see some comment on that IP, which says IP is used by non existing cluster, it complicates manual cleanup even further. Maybe comment can be refreshed every so often?
Describe the bug
IP comment show bad info from non existing deleted cluster.
Reproduction steps
Expected behavior
Comment contains new cluster and service info.
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: