Make fastest network finding more efficient

[gentlementlegen]

Instead of trying to resolve all the promises to see which network is the fastest, it would be more efficient to return the first one that resolves the network call successfully as it is probably the fastest.

          @Keyrxng @0x4007 I changed the logic a bit so instead of naively removing the first RPC of the list, the failing RPC is actually removed.

This also made me wonder, why do we test every endpoint when we are only interested in the fastest one, aka the first one to successfully fulfill the response? If we have to wait for slow RPCs, for example one that take 5 seconds to complete, doesn't it defeat the purpose of the function?

Originally posted by @gentlementlegen in #33 (comment)

[ubiquibot]

@gentlementlegen, You are not allowed to add Time: <2 Hours

[ubiquibot]

! No permission to set labels

[ubiquibot]

@gentlementlegen, You are not allowed to add Priority: 2 (Medium)

[ubiquibot]

! No permission to set labels

[0x4007]

@gentlementlegen I added the labels for you 😄

[ubiquibot]

@gentlementlegen the deadline is at 2024-08-18T11:08:57.568Z

[gentlementlegen]

@0x4007 It seems that closing issues automatically does not trigger the conversation rewards. Maybe this is because the actor is a bot so it gets skipped by the kernel.

[ubiquity-os]

[ 136.6 WXDAI ]

@gentlementlegen

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Task	1	100
Issue	Specification	1	36.6
Issue	Comment	1	0
Review	Comment	6	0

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
Instead of trying to resolve all the promises to see which netwo…	36.6 content: p: count: 122 score: 1 em: count: 6 score: 0 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 3	1	36.6
@0x4007 It seems that closing issues automatically does not trig…	5.8 content: p: count: 29 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 1	-	-
Resolves #43 QA (used with the newly created function): https:…	0 content: p: count: 10 score: 1 wordValue: 0 formattingMultiplier: 0	0.2	-
It returns a single item not an array, what can I count?	0 content: p: count: 12 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 0	1	-
Simply to avoid always using the same providers in the same orde…	0 content: p: count: 46 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 0	1	-
I have no idea, not of my making, but my guess would be to avoid…	0 content: p: count: 22 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 0	1	-
@Keyrxng I guess I can remove the proxy, although it is removabl…	0 content: h2: count: 55 score: 1 p: count: 16 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 0	1	-
@Keyrxng the tests and overall functions were unreliable when no…	0 content: p: count: 102 score: 1 code: count: 1 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 0	1	-

[ 2.18 WXDAI ]

@0x4007

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	1	0.08
Review	Comment	3	2.1

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
@gentlementlegen I added the labels for you 😄	0.8 content: p: count: 8 score: 1 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	0.1	0.08
Maybe also count the results, it should be one.	0.9 content: p: count: 9 score: 1 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	1	0.9
What's the purpose of shuffling the array?	0.7 content: p: count: 7 score: 1 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	1	0.7
I wonder why two underscores.	0.5 content: p: count: 5 score: 1 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	1	0.5

[ 31.9 WXDAI ]

@Keyrxng

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Review	Comment	3	31.9

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
Gave the function a try in `script-test.ts` and it looks…	6.8 content: p: count: 67 score: 1 code: count: 1 score: 1 img: count: 1 score: 0 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	1	6.8
I like this idea we should have had something like this from the…	9.8 content: p: count: 23 score: 1 ul: count: 74 score: 0 li: count: 74 score: 1 code: count: 1 score: 1 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	1	9.8
I think it makes sense to have this return only a non-proxy sinc…	15.3 content: p: count: 146 score: 1 code: count: 7 score: 1 pre: count: 6 score: 0 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	1	15.3