Enhance READMEs with technical architecture documentation #4
Comments
|
Note The following contributors may be suitable for this task: gentlementlegen
minhyeong112
|
|
/wallet 0xe580eF1f6f333145180e9c498036EEE38bA6F7f5 |
|
Tip Successfully set wallet |
|
/start |
Tip
|
|
Important
|
|
/help |
Available Commands
|
|
/ask draft me a blog article about the technical architecture of the text-vector-embeddings repo in this org |
|
Based on the provided context, I can help draft a blog article about the text-vector-embeddings technical architecture. However, I notice that there isn't a specific text-vector-embeddings repository directly mentioned in the context. Instead, I can see related vector embedding implementation discussions from the issues, particularly around Cloudflare's solution. Here's a draft blog article based on the available information: Technical Architecture: Vector Embeddings ImplementationOverviewOur system leverages Cloudflare's vector embedding infrastructure to generate and store text embeddings for analyzing GitHub conversations and comments. The architecture is designed to be serverless and efficient, utilizing Cloudflare's Core Components1. Vector Embedding Generation
2. Storage Layer
3. Analysis Pipeline
Key Features
Infrastructure Benefits
Future Enhancements
This architecture provides a foundation for intelligent project management and contributor engagement through advanced text analysis capabilities. Note: This blog article is based on the architectural discussions and plans found in the issues. The actual implementation details may vary as the project evolves. |
|
@0x4007 README enhancements complete. Requesting feedback. |
|
It's too bad you didn't link them officially as the deliverables. I'm not sure I'll get my review credit but let's see. |
|
I thought "fixes" only worked within the same repository, linking one issue to one PR. So, I didn't think you could use "fixes" to link 13 PRs from different repositories to a single issue. Should I add comments like "fixes #4" in each PR? |
|
You can paste the full link to the issue. We usually do it like |
|
I linked one as an example. Edit and check the source markdown for reference. |
|
| View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue | Task | 1 | 50 |
| Issue | Specification | 1 | 17 |
Conversation Incentives
| Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Priority | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Add technical architecture details to all READMEs in this github… | 6.7content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
a:
score: 5
elementCount: 1
result: 5
regex:
wordCount: 28
wordValue: 0.1
result: 1.7
| 1 | 2 | 17 |
[ 50 WXDAI ]
@0x4007
Contributions Overview
| View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
| Review | Base Review for #65 | 1 | 25 |
| Review | Code Review | 3 | 2.46 |
| Issue | Comment | 3 | 2.29 |
| Review | Comment | 9 | 26.628 |
Review Details for #65
| Changes | Priority | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| +87 -0 | 2 | 1.74 |
| +18 -13 | 2 | 0.62 |
| +3 -2 | 2 | 0.1 |
Conversation Incentives
| Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Priority | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|---|
It's too bad you didn't link them officially as the deliverables… | 1.65content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 27
wordValue: 0.1
result: 1.65
| 0 | 2 | 0 |
You can paste the full link to the issue. We usually do it like … | 0.94content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 14
wordValue: 0.1
result: 0.94
| 0.5 | 2 | 1.12 |
I linked one as an example. Edit and check the source markdown f… | 0.94content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 14
wordValue: 0.1
result: 0.94
| 0.5 | 2 | 1.17 |
```suggestion│ OpenRouter.ai │ … | 5.71content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
a:
score: 5
elementCount: 1
result: 5
regex:
wordCount: 10
wordValue: 0.1
result: 0.71
| 0.5 | 2 | 7.4 |
You might wanna make all of the AI references more agnostic usin… | 1.38content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 22
wordValue: 0.1
result: 1.38
| 0.7 | 2 | 2.492 |
It might be more suitable to refer to this plug-in as "the ask c… | 2.4content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 42
wordValue: 0.1
result: 2.4
| 0.6 | 2 | 3.732 |
Originally, maybe. These days I believe we changed the default t… | 1content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 15
wordValue: 0.1
result: 1
| 0.4 | 2 | 1 |
Seems a bit redundant as you mentioned this earlier | 0.65content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 9
wordValue: 0.1
result: 0.65
| 0.3 | 2 | 0.486 |
All "ubiquibot" terminology has been deprecated in favor of "Ubi… | 1.11content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 17
wordValue: 0.1
result: 1.11
| 0.9 | 2 | 2.322 |
Shouldn't we switch every plugin to OpenRouter? | 0.59content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 8
wordValue: 0.1
result: 0.59
| 0.8 | 2 | 1.2 |
https://github.com/ubiquity-os-marketplace/.github/issues/5 | 5content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
a:
score: 5
elementCount: 1
result: 5
regex:
wordCount: 0
wordValue: 0.1
result: 0
| 0.6 | 2 | 7.512 |
This must be in the pull body so you need to edit the top commen… | 1content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 15
wordValue: 0.1
result: 1
| 0.2 | 2 | 0.484 |
[ 7.862 WXDAI ]
@shiv810
Contributions Overview
| View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
| Review | Code Review | 1 | 2.08 |
| Review | Comment | 4 | 5.782 |
Review Details for #65
| Changes | Priority | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| +98 -6 | 2 | 2.08 |
Conversation Incentives
| Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Priority | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|---|
```suggestion┌─────────────────┐ ┌────────… | 1.22content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 19
wordValue: 0.1
result: 1.22
| 0.8 | 2 | 2.464 |
```suggestionopenAiBaseUrl: ""` … | 0.52content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 7
wordValue: 0.1
result: 0.52
| 0.9 | 2 | 1.17 |
```suggestionVOYAGEAI_API_KEY=your_voyageai_api_ke… | 0content:
content: {}
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 0
wordValue: 0.1
result: 0
| 0.5 | 2 | 0 |
Yes, we should be converting everywhere. Except for the `Com… | 1.38content:
content:
p:
score: 0
elementCount: 1
result: 0
regex:
wordCount: 22
wordValue: 0.1
result: 1.38
| 0.6 | 2 | 2.148 |
|
Caution All linked pull requests must be closed to generate rewards. |
|
Caution All linked pull requests must be closed to generate rewards. |
ubiquity-os-beta
bot
closed this as completed
in
ubiquity-os-marketplace/text-vector-embeddings#80
|
Caution All linked pull requests must be closed to generate rewards. |
|
seems like PRs and issues should only be matched 1-to-1 right? (seems like a github constraint, not a UbiquityOS constraint) |
|
No we can link one issue to many pulls. This problem we are seeing is caused by the automated pull request review capability but gentlementlegen has a fix ready. |
ubiquity-os-beta
bot
closed this as completed
in
ubiquity-os-marketplace/daemon-disqualifier#78
|
Caution All linked pull requests must be closed to generate rewards. |
Add technical architecture details to all READMEs in this github org. 1
should take less than 1 hour.
Footnotes
⚠ 82% possible duplicate - Enhance READMEs with technical architecture documentation ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: