Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Citygml #113

Open
stirringhalo opened this issue Sep 3, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Citygml #113

stirringhalo opened this issue Sep 3, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@stirringhalo
Copy link

I think it would be a fantastic feature to add support to export Citygml files for use with projects like 3dcitydb !

@tordanik
Copy link
Owner

A CityGML export is occasionally requested as a feature, and it would be good to have as one of the Targets in OSM2World. Wishlisting it.

@stirringhalo
Copy link
Author

stirringhalo commented Sep 18, 2016

Here's my use-case (https://github.com/stirringhalo/osm2citygml). Osm2citygml is similar to https://github.com/stirringhalo/osm2cesium but will be much more scalable with 3DCityDB backing.

CityGML is a feature I'd love, even with just GenericCityObject as opposed to fancy semantics. It saves an FME license, processing time and data handling.

@Matthias84
Copy link

I pinged the folks at 3dcitydb / citygml4j if they like to help you on adding that feature:
3dcitydb/importer-exporter#81

@Matthias84
Copy link

They are ready to help to add export using https://github.com/citygml4j/citygml4j
Can anybody support form the O2W side?

@tordanik
Copy link
Owner

tordanik commented Apr 3, 2019

Using citygml4j looks like a very promising building block for a OSM -> CityGML pipeline. The main challenge would appear to be mapping OSM2World's internal representation onto citygml4j's, but it seems feasible at first glance. I'm interested in exploring this further and would be available for a meeting as alluded to in @clausnagel's most recent post.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants