Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do you think this can work with drpc too? #132

Closed
frederikhors opened this issue Jul 18, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed

Do you think this can work with drpc too? #132

frederikhors opened this issue Jul 18, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@frederikhors
Copy link

Do you think this can work with https://github.com/storj/drpc too?

@timostamm
Copy link
Owner

RPC in protobuf is not specific to gRPC. And gRPC could theoretically also be used with other serialization mechanisms. If drpc is written with that in mind, then yes, protobuf-ts can work with drpc too.

@frederikhors
Copy link
Author

It would be amazing to have these info on the manual. Can we reopen this until then (i will try this in the next few days).

@timostamm
Copy link
Owner

You mean that protobuf RCP doesn't depend on gRPC? Or drpc specifically?

@frederikhors
Copy link
Author

I would like to use protobuf-ts with drpc directly.

@zeebo is working hard to make this possible.

@frederikhors
Copy link
Author

It would be amazing to have in MANUAL instructions like for twirp or grpc-web.

@timostamm
Copy link
Owner

The README.md has links to the twirp, grpc-web, grpc sections in the MANUAL.md.
Once drpc has support, it can have its own section.

If you have an idea to surface the features in a better way, let me know. I think a docusaurus page would help, with a better navigation than the markdown manual.

@frederikhors
Copy link
Author

I think that for now the manual.md is excellent. Docusaurus means a lot of work for what? Infos in clickable pages?

I think the informations for this project at least for now can stay that way.

As soon as I know something about drpc I'll write to you here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants